This article is from the source 'guardian' and was first published or seen on . The next check for changes will be

You can find the current article at its original source at https://www.theguardian.com/business/2025/apr/17/bp-braces-for-investor-rebellion-at-first-agm-since-climate-strategy-u-turn

The article has changed 3 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 0 Version 1
BP braces for investor rebellion at first AGM since climate strategy U-turn BP suffers investor rebellion at first AGM since climate strategy U-turn
(about 5 hours later)
Oil company’s chair, Helge Lund, may bear brunt of shareholder anger after presiding over rapid drop in value Nearly a quarter of shareholders vote against the chair, Helge Lund, as green protesters descend on meeting
BP is braced for an investor rebellion on Thursday as the oil company prepares to face its shareholders for the first time since abandoning its climate strategy. BP suffered an investor rebellion on Thursday after facing shareholders for the first time since abandoning its climate strategy at a meeting marred by protest.
Its chair, Helge Lund, is expected to be voted out of his job by disgruntled investors at the company’s annual general meeting, which is also likely to be marked by protest from climate campaigners and investors. About a quarter of shareholders voted against the chair, Helge Lund, at the company’s annual general meeting in Sunbury-on-Thames, on the edges of London, which attracted protest from several green campaign groups.
The shareholder meeting comes weeks after Lund, who presided over BP’s groundbreaking 2020 climate targets and the company’s subsequent retreat, promised to step down from the company by next year. The Guardian understands that five protesters were forcibly removed from the meeting before the vote, which marked the first time in at least a decade that more than 10% of BP’s shareholders voted against the re-election of the chair.
Despite his resignation, the chair will still face a shareholder vote on his role in which some of BP’s largest investors are expected to turn against him in protest over the company’s rapidly falling value in recent years. The activists from Fossil Free London and Energy Embargo for Palestine confronted BP executives, describing the board as “murderers, looters and genocide enablers”, before major institutional investors voted against the re-election of Lund.
The UK asset manager Legal & General, a leading shareholder in BP, has voiced plans to vote against Lund’s re-election citing the company’s recent green U-turn and its decision not to allow its shareholders to vote on the new direction. The shareholder meeting was held weeks after Lund, who presided over BP’s failed green agenda, promised to step down from the company by next year.
The standoff will take place almost 15 years to the day after the deadly Deepwater Horizon disaster led to the largest marine oil spill in US history and plunged the company into a multi-billion dollar crisis. Despite his resignation, the chair was forced to face a shareholder vote to re-elect him to the post until his departure, creating a lightning rod for disgruntled investors. The resolution received a provisional 24.3% of opposed votes.
The outgoing chair told shareholders that the company had “pursued too much while looking to build new low-carbon businesses” but that “lessons have been learned”.
BP’s chief executive, Murray Auchincloss, repeated his previous claim that BP’s optimism in the global green energy transition was “misplaced”, and that the board’s “one simple goal” was to “grow the long-term value of your investment”.
A strategy overhaul was considered by many industry commentators as BP’s only defence against the advance of an aggressive activist investor fund that could threaten the breakup of the 115-year-old company.
The feared New York fund Elliott Investment Management amassed a stake in the company earlier this year. It typically takes aim at underperforming companies by agitating for changes that could resuscitate their flagging market value.
Elliott is expected to call for sweeping changes to BP, which has lagged behind rivals such as Shell and ExxonMobil that have profited from the global energy market crisis in recent years by increasing their fossil fuel production.
Mark Van Baal, the founder of the green activist investor group Follow This, said shareholders had “made it clear that weakening climate commitments is unacceptable”.
He added: “This historical result serves as a wake-up call to BP’s board and emphasises investor expectation for robust governance mechanisms and genuine leadership on ESG issues.”
Sign up to Business Today
Get set for the working day – we'll point you to all the business news and analysis you need every morning
after newsletter promotion
Agathe Masson, a campaigner at Reclaim Finance, said the historic vote “sends a clear message to the BP board that their green U-turn was a backwards step and that some shareholders clearly want to invest in a green transition”.
The rebellion included the UK asset manager Legal & General, a leading shareholder in BP, which voiced plans to vote against Lund’s re-election ahead of the vote, citing the company’s recent green U-turn and its decision not to allow its shareholders to vote on the new direction.
Under Auchincloss, BP has scrapped plans to restrict its fossil fuel production in favour of green investments. Instead, the company will be “very selective” about investing in low-carbon options while growing its planned fossil fuel production to 2.4m barrels of oil and gas a day by 2030 – about 60% higher than the figure in its net zero plan set out five years ago.
The vote marks the biggest rebellion against the board since 2016, when almost 60% of shareholders voted against BP’s decision to hand the then CEO, Bob Dudley, a $20m (£15.1m) pay packet in the same year that a global oil market rout pushed the company to record losses.
The latest shareholder standoff took place almost 15 years to the day after the deadly Deepwater Horizon disaster led to the largest marine oil spill in US history and plunged the company into a $70bn dollar crisis.
The company announced this week an oil discovery in “the Gulf of America” – using Donald Trump’s newly mandated US name for the Gulf of Mexico – which it said underscored its plan to “step up investment in exploration”.The company announced this week an oil discovery in “the Gulf of America” – using Donald Trump’s newly mandated US name for the Gulf of Mexico – which it said underscored its plan to “step up investment in exploration”.
BP faces a fresh existential crisis after the activist hedge fund Elliott Investment Management amassed a stake in the company earlier this year. The feared New York fund typically takes aim at underperforming companies by agitating for changes that could resuscitate their flagging market value.
Elliott is expected to call for sweeping changes to the company, which has lagged behind its rivals such as Shell and ExxonMobil that have profited from the global energy market crisis in recent years by increasing their fossil fuel production.
BP’s chief executive, Murray Auchincloss, blamed “misplaced” optimism in the global green energy transition for the company’s decision to scrap plans to curb its fossil fuel production in favour of green investments.
Instead, BP aims to be “very selective” about investing in low-carbon options while growing its planned fossil fuel production to 2.4m barrels of oil and gas a day by 2030 – about 60% higher than the figure in its net zero plan set out five years ago.