This article is from the source 'rtcom' and was first published or seen on . The next check for changes will be
You can find the current article at its original source at https://www.rt.com/news/615867-german-chancellor-taurus-debate/
The article has changed 4 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.
Version 0 | Version 1 |
---|---|
Intel reports will sober up incoming German chancellor on Ukraine missiles – SPD | Intel reports will sober up incoming German chancellor on Ukraine missiles – SPD |
(about 4 hours later) | |
Friedrich Merz should not supply Taurus missiles to Kiev, the leader of the Social Democrats has warned | |
Incoming German Chancellor Friedrich Merz will be swayed from delivering Taurus cruise missiles to Ukraine once he begins to receive classified intelligence briefings on the matter, Matthias Miersch, the leader of the Social Democrats (SPD), has said. | |
Berlin ruled out sending the long-range weapon system, which has a range of 500km, while the SPD was part of the ruling coalition. The party suffered a historic defeat to Friedrich Merz’s conservative Christian Democratic Union (CDU) in February. The conservatives and Social Democrats are currently in talks to form a new government. | |
Speaking to the news channel n-tv on Wednesday, Miersch criticized Merz’s readiness to deliver the Taurus and risk open confrontation with Russia. | |
“We have always been against it,” Miersch said. “I assume that Friedrich Merz, once fully informed by [intelligence] agencies, will reassess the issue clearly. We will then make the decision together,” he added. | “We have always been against it,” Miersch said. “I assume that Friedrich Merz, once fully informed by [intelligence] agencies, will reassess the issue clearly. We will then make the decision together,” he added. |
“I assume that we do not want to contribute to an escalation or become a party to the war – the very reason we chose not to deliver the Taurus [to Ukraine]. And I assume it will remain that way,” Miersch said. | “I assume that we do not want to contribute to an escalation or become a party to the war – the very reason we chose not to deliver the Taurus [to Ukraine]. And I assume it will remain that way,” Miersch said. |
Defense Minister Boris Pistorius, an SPD member, earlier said there are “many good arguments” against sending the missiles, and some of them cannot be discussed in public. | |
Speaking to ARD on Sunday, Merz confirmed that he would like to supply Taurus missiles to Kiev. “Yes, that was exactly what I meant – not that we would intervene in the war ourselves, but that we would be equipping the Ukrainian army with such a weapon.” | |
He suggested that Kiev could use it to strike the bridge connecting Crimea with mainland Russia. Roderich Kiesewetter, the CDU’s defense spokesman, argued that the Taurus would help Ukraine “destroy Russian supply lines and command bunkers.” | |
The missile debate is unfolding as US President Donald Trump works to broker a Russian-Ukrainian ceasefire through shuttle diplomacy. | The missile debate is unfolding as US President Donald Trump works to broker a Russian-Ukrainian ceasefire through shuttle diplomacy. |
Moscow has warned that no amount of Western arms deliveries will prevent it from achieving its goals in the conflict. The Taurus will “not bring any changes to the battlefield,” Russia’s ambassador to Germany, Sergey Nechayev, said on Wednesday. | |
They would, however, make Germany directly involved in the conflict, as “Ukrainian soldiers… cannot operate the long-range weapon” without Berlin’s help, Nechayev said. |