This article is from the source 'bbc' and was first published or seen on . It will not be checked again for changes.
You can find the current article at its original source at http://news.bbc.co.uk/go/rss/-/1/hi/uk_politics/6364281.stm
The article has changed 13 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.
Version 3 | Version 4 |
---|---|
Nuclear review 'was misleading' | Nuclear review 'was misleading' |
(30 minutes later) | |
Greenpeace has won its High Court bid to make the government rethink its programme to build a new generation of nuclear power stations. | Greenpeace has won its High Court bid to make the government rethink its programme to build a new generation of nuclear power stations. |
A judge ruled that the consultation process before making the decision last year had been "misleading", "seriously flawed" and "procedurally unfair". | |
Greenpeace said the ministers should "go back to the drawing board". | Greenpeace said the ministers should "go back to the drawing board". |
The government said the judgement was on the "process of consultation, not the principle of nuclear power". | The government said the judgement was on the "process of consultation, not the principle of nuclear power". |
'Updating' | 'Updating' |
Greenpeace's Emma Gibson told the BBC: "The government's so-called consultation was a sham and we are very pleased the judge has agreed with us on that. | |
"If Tony Blair wants to continue with his misguided plan for a whole new generation of nuclear power stations, the government will have to go back to the drawing board." | |
The government has been shown up as fundamentally deceitful Alan Duncan, Conservatives | The government has been shown up as fundamentally deceitful Alan Duncan, Conservatives |
In 2003, the Energy White Paper described nuclear power as an "unattractive option". | |
It added: "Before any decision to proceed with the building of new nuclear power stations, there will need to be the fullest possibly public consultation and the publication of a further white paper setting out our proposals." | It added: "Before any decision to proceed with the building of new nuclear power stations, there will need to be the fullest possibly public consultation and the publication of a further white paper setting out our proposals." |
The government launched a fresh energy review in January 2006, and after public consultation in July published a report, The Energy Challenge, which said "new nuclear power stations would make a significant contribution to meeting our energy policy goals". | |
In court, Greenpeace said the consultation had not fulfilled the promise to carry out "the fullest public consultation". | In court, Greenpeace said the consultation had not fulfilled the promise to carry out "the fullest public consultation". |
It complained that there had been a failure to present clear proposals and information on key issues, such as disposal of radioactive waste and building costs. | It complained that there had been a failure to present clear proposals and information on key issues, such as disposal of radioactive waste and building costs. |
'Radically wrong' | 'Radically wrong' |
Trade and Industry Secretary Alistair Darling, contesting the judicial review, argued that the energy review was only part of an ongoing process which would ensure full consultation. | Trade and Industry Secretary Alistair Darling, contesting the judicial review, argued that the energy review was only part of an ongoing process which would ensure full consultation. |
But Mr Justice Sullivan said "something has gone clearly and radically wrong". | But Mr Justice Sullivan said "something has gone clearly and radically wrong". |
The consultation document had given every appearance of being simply an "issues paper". | The consultation document had given every appearance of being simply an "issues paper". |
There could be no proper consultation, let alone the fullest consultation Mr Justice Sullivan | There could be no proper consultation, let alone the fullest consultation Mr Justice Sullivan |
It had contained no actual proposals and the information given to consultees had been "wholly insufficient for them to make an intelligent response". | It had contained no actual proposals and the information given to consultees had been "wholly insufficient for them to make an intelligent response". |
The judge said information given on waste had been "not merely inadequate but also misleading". | The judge said information given on waste had been "not merely inadequate but also misleading". |
Fairness required that consultees should be given a proper opportunity to respond to that substantial amount of new material before any decision was taken. | Fairness required that consultees should be given a proper opportunity to respond to that substantial amount of new material before any decision was taken. |
"There could be no proper consultation, let alone the fullest consultation, if the substance of these two issues was not consulted on before a decision was made," said the judge. | "There could be no proper consultation, let alone the fullest consultation, if the substance of these two issues was not consulted on before a decision was made," said the judge. |
"There was therefore procedural unfairness and a breach of Greenpeace's legitimate expectation that there would be the fullest consultation before a decision was taken." | "There was therefore procedural unfairness and a breach of Greenpeace's legitimate expectation that there would be the fullest consultation before a decision was taken." |
'Tough choices' | 'Tough choices' |
The judge granted what he called a "quashing order". | The judge granted what he called a "quashing order". |
The Department of Trade and Industry issued a statement saying: "This judgement is about the process of consultation, not the principle of nuclear power. We will of course consult further. | The Department of Trade and Industry issued a statement saying: "This judgement is about the process of consultation, not the principle of nuclear power. We will of course consult further. |
"Tackling climate change takes leadership, taking on tough long-term choices. | "Tackling climate change takes leadership, taking on tough long-term choices. |
"This is why we continue to believe nuclear power has a role to play in cutting emissions and helping to give this country the energy security it needs." | "This is why we continue to believe nuclear power has a role to play in cutting emissions and helping to give this country the energy security it needs." |
Shadow trade and industry secretary Alan Duncan said: "This is an astonishing ruling. | Shadow trade and industry secretary Alan Duncan said: "This is an astonishing ruling. |
"What it really says is that the government has been shown up as fundamentally deceitful." | "What it really says is that the government has been shown up as fundamentally deceitful." |
'Slap in the face' | |
Liberal Democrat environment spokesman Chris Huhne said: "The judgement really shows you can't perform a 180-degree U-turn on a matter as important as nuclear power without a proper public debate. | |
"It's a real slap in the face for prime minister's sofa style of government." | |
The government says its proposals, including building more nuclear plants, will cut carbon emissions by 19 to 25 million tonnes by 2020, compared with projections based on current trends. | The government says its proposals, including building more nuclear plants, will cut carbon emissions by 19 to 25 million tonnes by 2020, compared with projections based on current trends. |
In January, Mr Blair said it was important to ensure that the UK had a diverse energy supply, including nuclear power. | |
"If we don't get these decisions right, and get them right quickly, we will pay a very heavy price in the future." | "If we don't get these decisions right, and get them right quickly, we will pay a very heavy price in the future." |
A White Paper is still expected to be published next month. |