This article is from the source 'bbc' and was first published or seen on . The next check for changes will be
You can find the current article at its original source at https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cly24l6qg6qo
The article has changed 3 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.
| Version 1 | Version 2 |
|---|---|
| Fire safety changes for Penge flats are 'shocking' | Fire safety changes for Penge flats are 'shocking' |
| (about 2 hours later) | |
| The Fire Brigades Union said it was "pretty shocking" the affected block in the new development will not get a second staircase | The Fire Brigades Union said it was "pretty shocking" the affected block in the new development will not get a second staircase |
| The Fire Brigades Union (FBU) has said revised plans for a development at a shopping centre are "shocking", despite being approved by the Greater London Authority. | |
| The multi-storey 230 home development at the site of the Blenheim Shopping Centre in Penge, south-east London, was also criticised by London Fire Brigade (LFB) for not "deferring to the spirit" of fire safety guidance. | The multi-storey 230 home development at the site of the Blenheim Shopping Centre in Penge, south-east London, was also criticised by London Fire Brigade (LFB) for not "deferring to the spirit" of fire safety guidance. |
| Developers Hadley Property Group and Clarion Housing Group reduced the height of one of the buildings to avoid the need for a second staircase. | Developers Hadley Property Group and Clarion Housing Group reduced the height of one of the buildings to avoid the need for a second staircase. |
| In a statement Hadley Clarion said the changes were not mandatory and transitional measures would have permitted the original plans. | In a statement Hadley Clarion said the changes were not mandatory and transitional measures would have permitted the original plans. |
| Developers Hadley Property Group said the site's current shopping centre had no architectural merit | Developers Hadley Property Group said the site's current shopping centre had no architectural merit |
| In a joint venture with the UK's largest housing association Clarion Property Group, Hadley Property Group applied to Bromley Council in 2022 to build six blocks at the site of the old shopping centre, ranging from three to 16 storeys high. | In a joint venture with the UK's largest housing association Clarion Property Group, Hadley Property Group applied to Bromley Council in 2022 to build six blocks at the site of the old shopping centre, ranging from three to 16 storeys high. |
| The following year, in July 2023, the previous Conservative government confirmed that any new residential building in England more than 18m high (59ft) will in future need to have two staircases, external in case of fire, as part of its response to the Grenfell Inquiry following the 2017 fire. | The following year, in July 2023, the previous Conservative government confirmed that any new residential building in England more than 18m high (59ft) will in future need to have two staircases, external in case of fire, as part of its response to the Grenfell Inquiry following the 2017 fire. |
| One of the blocks in the proposed Blenheim Square development, referred to in the application as Block A, was designed to be six storeys high with a single staircase - a total of 18.74m (about 61ft). | One of the blocks in the proposed Blenheim Square development, referred to in the application as Block A, was designed to be six storeys high with a single staircase - a total of 18.74m (about 61ft). |
| Bromley Council approved the plans in March 2024, with the Greater London Authority also giving its approval in December | Bromley Council approved the plans in March 2024, with the Greater London Authority also giving its approval in December |
| Following the government announcement, Hadley Clarion revised the design and reduced the height of the commercial units on the ground floor, taking the overall building height down to 17.7m - just 30cm below the threshold. | Following the government announcement, Hadley Clarion revised the design and reduced the height of the commercial units on the ground floor, taking the overall building height down to 17.7m - just 30cm below the threshold. |
| After the revised plans were submitted, LFB was consulted by the council and in a letter, it noted the building was still tall "and is reliant on a single staircase". | After the revised plans were submitted, LFB was consulted by the council and in a letter, it noted the building was still tall "and is reliant on a single staircase". |
| "We therefore do not see this as deferring to the spirit of the guidance used and doesn't ethically justify this decision," LFB's letter continued. | "We therefore do not see this as deferring to the spirit of the guidance used and doesn't ethically justify this decision," LFB's letter continued. |
| However, Bromley Council went on to approve the plans in March 2024, with the Greater London Authority also giving its approval in December 2024. | However, Bromley Council went on to approve the plans in March 2024, with the Greater London Authority also giving its approval in December 2024. |
| Matt Wrack from the FBU said "the risks are actually almost identical" to a taller building | Matt Wrack from the FBU said "the risks are actually almost identical" to a taller building |
| The FBU told BBC London it was "pretty shocking" Block A will not get a second staircase given the small reduction in height. | The FBU told BBC London it was "pretty shocking" Block A will not get a second staircase given the small reduction in height. |
| The FBU's General Secretary Matt Wrack said: "The building is essentially the same as another building that would be 30cm taller. | The FBU's General Secretary Matt Wrack said: "The building is essentially the same as another building that would be 30cm taller. |
| "Therefore the risks are actually almost identical to a building that wouldn't meet the requirements of the regulations." | "Therefore the risks are actually almost identical to a building that wouldn't meet the requirements of the regulations." |
| However, Matt Hodges-Long, from the Building Safety Register, said LFB's language in its letter "seems a little intemperate". | However, Matt Hodges-Long, from the Building Safety Register, said LFB's language in its letter "seems a little intemperate". |
| "If we look at the wording of the law, I don't see there is anything wrong with what the developer has put forward in terms of an approach," he added. | "If we look at the wording of the law, I don't see there is anything wrong with what the developer has put forward in terms of an approach," he added. |
| "The regulations kick in at 18m; this building is below 18m." | "The regulations kick in at 18m; this building is below 18m." |
| Mike Payne, from the Stop Hadley campaign group, he is concerned by the plans | Mike Payne, from the Stop Hadley campaign group, he is concerned by the plans |
| Local resident and Stop Hadley campaign group member Mike Payne said: "If the fire brigade are saying that this building isn't justifiable ethically then clearly there's something wrong, and that concerns me." | Local resident and Stop Hadley campaign group member Mike Payne said: "If the fire brigade are saying that this building isn't justifiable ethically then clearly there's something wrong, and that concerns me." |
| A spokesperson for the Hadley Property Group and Clarion Housing Group said: "All the buildings in the scheme comply fully with the latest building regulations and fire safety standards. | A spokesperson for the Hadley Property Group and Clarion Housing Group said: "All the buildings in the scheme comply fully with the latest building regulations and fire safety standards. |
| "As a matter of best practice Hadley Clarion took the step of redesigning the scheme twice during the planning process to meet evolving legislation... when the threshold was amended to 18 metres...requiring two staircases." | "As a matter of best practice Hadley Clarion took the step of redesigning the scheme twice during the planning process to meet evolving legislation... when the threshold was amended to 18 metres...requiring two staircases." |
| They added: "This was done despite transitional arrangements that could have allowed us to proceed with the original plans. | They added: "This was done despite transitional arrangements that could have allowed us to proceed with the original plans. |
| "These costly and time-consuming decisions were made to prioritise safety and ensure compliance with the highest standards." | "These costly and time-consuming decisions were made to prioritise safety and ensure compliance with the highest standards." |
| Listen to the best of BBC Radio London on Sounds and follow BBC London on Facebook, external, X, external and Instagram, external. Send your story ideas to hello.bbclondon@bbc.co.uk, external | Listen to the best of BBC Radio London on Sounds and follow BBC London on Facebook, external, X, external and Instagram, external. Send your story ideas to hello.bbclondon@bbc.co.uk, external |