This article is from the source 'bbc' and was first published or seen on . The next check for changes will be

You can find the current article at its original source at https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cp8nkj2k237o

The article has changed 9 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 1 Version 2
Royal Mail fined £10.5m for missing delivery targets Royal Mail fined £10.5m for missing delivery targets
(32 minutes later)
Royal Mail has been fined £10.5m by the regulator for failing to meet delivery targets for first and second class mail.Royal Mail has been fined £10.5m by the regulator for failing to meet delivery targets for first and second class mail.
It is the second year in a row the company has been fined by Ofcom for poor delivery performance. The fine is almost double the penalty the company was hit with last year for the same reason.
Ofcom said, external Royal Mail's poor service was "now eroding public trust in one of the UK's oldest institutions".Ofcom said, external Royal Mail's poor service was "now eroding public trust in one of the UK's oldest institutions".
Royal Mail owner International Distribution Services (IDS) said, external it had carried out "substantial" reforms this year to try to drive improvements.Royal Mail owner International Distribution Services (IDS) said, external it had carried out "substantial" reforms this year to try to drive improvements.
"We are making the necessary changes to deliver for our customers," IDS said."We are making the necessary changes to deliver for our customers," IDS said.
However, Ofcom director of enforcement Ian Strawhorne said: "With millions of letters arriving late, far too many people aren't getting what they pay for when they buy a stamp.However, Ofcom director of enforcement Ian Strawhorne said: "With millions of letters arriving late, far too many people aren't getting what they pay for when they buy a stamp.
"Royal Mail has provided an improvement plan, and we're seeing some signs of progress, but it must go further and faster to deliver the service that people expect.""Royal Mail has provided an improvement plan, and we're seeing some signs of progress, but it must go further and faster to deliver the service that people expect."
Royal Mail was privatised more than a decade ago, but it is still legally required to deliver letters across the UK at a set price six days a week. Royal Mail was privatised more than a decade ago, but under the Universal Service Obligation it is still legally required to deliver letters across the UK at a set price six days a week.
Under Ofcom's rules, the postal operator is meant to deliver at least 93% of first class mail within one working day, and 98.5% of second class post within three working days.Under Ofcom's rules, the postal operator is meant to deliver at least 93% of first class mail within one working day, and 98.5% of second class post within three working days.
In the year to the end of March, however, it missed both targets reaching figures of just 74.7% and 92.7% respectively. However, in the year to the end of March it missed both targets, reaching figures of just 74.7% and 92.7% respectively.
Ofcom said the company had blamed its poor performance on its challenging financial position, and on delays to a ballot on a pay deal following strike action by members of the Communication Workers' Union last year.Ofcom said the company had blamed its poor performance on its challenging financial position, and on delays to a ballot on a pay deal following strike action by members of the Communication Workers' Union last year.
However, Ofcom said: "We do not consider either of these to be justifiable reasons for Royal Mail's failure to provide the levels of service expected of it.However, Ofcom said: "We do not consider either of these to be justifiable reasons for Royal Mail's failure to provide the levels of service expected of it.
"Royal Mail took insufficient and ineffective steps to try and prevent this failure, which is likely to have impacted millions of customers who did not get the service they paid for.""Royal Mail took insufficient and ineffective steps to try and prevent this failure, which is likely to have impacted millions of customers who did not get the service they paid for."
Last year, Royal Mail was fined £5.6m for the same reason. Last year, Royal Mail was fined £5.6m for failing to meet delivery targets in 2022-23.
Ofcom said that in addition to the fine, it had been pressing the company to see what it was doing to improve its performance.Ofcom said that in addition to the fine, it had been pressing the company to see what it was doing to improve its performance.
While there had been some progress, it said the improvement in 2023-24 had only been marginal and "it needs to do much better".While there had been some progress, it said the improvement in 2023-24 had only been marginal and "it needs to do much better".
News of the latest fine comes at a time when Royal Mail's parent, International Distribution Services, is facing a probable takeover by the Czech billionaire Daniel Kretinsky's EP Group. News of the fine comes at a time when Royal Mail's parent, IDS, is facing a probable takeover by the Czech billionaire Daniel Kretinsky's EP Group.
In recent years the business has struggled to make money. Its letters business has declined dramatically, with the volume being sent having halved since 2011.
However, last month IDS said its revenues had increased by 10% in the six months to the end of September, compared to the same period in 2023.
It made an operating loss of £26m, compared to £243m the year before.
Ofcom has been looking at ways in which the Universal Service could be reformed. In September, it said it would look at whether changes to second class deliveries, while continuing a six-day-a-week service for first class post, would meet customers' needs.
It had previously suggested Royal Mail could save hundreds of millions of pounds a year if it reduced its mail deliveries to five or even three days a week.
In its response to Ofcom's fine, IDS said it was essential that its own efforts to improve services were backed by "urgent reform" of the Universal Service, "restoring it to a level that meets the needs of today's postal users, not the needs of customers 20 years ago".
It said this would help to create a "modern, sustainable and reliable" postal service.