This article is from the source 'guardian' and was first published or seen on . The next check for changes will be

You can find the current article at its original source at https://www.theguardian.com/world/2024/dec/05/south-korea-updates-martial-law-yoon-suk-yeol-impeachment-kim-yong-hyun

The article has changed 7 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 1 Version 2
South Korea’s ruling party rallies behind Yoon Suk Yeol, vowing to block impeachment South Korea’s ruling party rallies behind Yoon Suk Yeol, vowing to block impeachment
(about 3 hours later)
People Power party says it will vote against impeachment bill brought by opposition amid outrage over Yoon’s attempt to declare martial lawPeople Power party says it will vote against impeachment bill brought by opposition amid outrage over Yoon’s attempt to declare martial law
South Korea’s ruling party says it will rally behind the beleaguered president, Yoon Suk Yeol, to block a move by the opposition to impeach him over his botched and controversial attempt to impose martial law.South Korea’s ruling party says it will rally behind the beleaguered president, Yoon Suk Yeol, to block a move by the opposition to impeach him over his botched and controversial attempt to impose martial law.
The floor leader of the People Power party vowed on Thursday that its lawmakers would “unite” to defeat the opposition-led motion to impeach the deeply unpopular president. The floor leader of the People Power party vowed on Thursday that its lawmakers would “unite” to defeat the opposition-led motion to impeach the deeply unpopular leader.
“All 108 lawmakers of the People Power party will stay united to reject the president’s impeachment,” Choo Kyung-ho told a livestreamed party meeting.“All 108 lawmakers of the People Power party will stay united to reject the president’s impeachment,” Choo Kyung-ho told a livestreamed party meeting.
Opposition lawmakers need eight ruling party lawmakers to vote with them for the impeachment bill to pass. The opposition says the vote is expected on Saturday.Opposition lawmakers need eight ruling party lawmakers to vote with them for the impeachment bill to pass. The opposition says the vote is expected on Saturday.
The political turmoil comes after Yoon’s surprise, late-night declaration of martial law on Tuesday, which was met with widespread condemnation and street protests, and alarmed international allies. Within a few hours Yoon was forced to rescind the order when parliamentarians defied an attempted military blockade and assembled to vote it down. It remained unclear on Thursday, though, whether enough members of Yoon’s party would give him the backing needed to avoid impeachment, as the embattled president sought to deflect criticism of his actions.
Yoon plunged the country into political turmoil on Tuesday evening after he declared martial law in a surprise, late-night televised address, saying it was needed to safeguard the country’s from “anti-state forces” and “threats posed by North Korea”. He did not provide details of the threats.
Within hours he was forced to rescind the order when parliamentarians defied an attempted military blockade and assembled to vote it down.
On Thursday, his health minister, Cho Kyoo-hong, said he disagreed with Yoon’s declaration, although he had taken part in a cabinet meeting shortly before the president’s shock announcement.
Cho told a parliamentary session the declaration had been illegal and unconstitutional, but claimed he could not recall if ministers had opposed Yoon at the cabinet meeting. “I was so surprised and flustered,” he said, according to the Yonhap news agency. “To be frank, I do not remember who said what.”
On Thursday morning, Yoon accepted the resignation of his defence minister Kim Yong-hyun and nominated his ambassador to Saudi Arabia, Choi Byung-hyuk, as the new defence minister.On Thursday morning, Yoon accepted the resignation of his defence minister Kim Yong-hyun and nominated his ambassador to Saudi Arabia, Choi Byung-hyuk, as the new defence minister.
Kim, who had also been facing an impeachment motion, reportedly advised Yoon to declare martial law on Tuesday. As Yoon has attempted to contain the fallout, more details have emerged of the confusion leading up to one of the most dramatic episodes in the modern history of South Korea, which is Asia’s fourth-largest economy and a key US ally.
Following the declaration, which attempted to ban political activity and censor the media in South Korea, armed troops attempted to force their way into the National Assembly building in Seoul, only to stand back when parliamentary aides sprayed them with fire extinguishers.
The vice-defence minister, Kim Seon-ho, claimed he had not been told in advance about plans, adding the decision to send troops to the national assembly building had come from the now departed defence minister.
Kim Seon-ho said he had opposed the troop deployment and disagreed with Yoon’s description, made during his televised address, of the assembly as a “den of criminals”.
The US deputy secretary of state, Kurt Campbell, said Yoon had “badly misjudged” the martial law decision, which took the White House by surprise.The US deputy secretary of state, Kurt Campbell, said Yoon had “badly misjudged” the martial law decision, which took the White House by surprise.
At an event organised by the Aspen Strategy Forum, Campbell said the fact that both political sides in South Korea could agree his decision was “deeply problematic” despite deep political polarisation and division was a reassuring tribute to the strength of South Korean democracy.
He said South Korea would be “in a challenging place” in the next few months and the US goal would be to make clear its alliance with Seoul is “absolutely rock solid.”He said South Korea would be “in a challenging place” in the next few months and the US goal would be to make clear its alliance with Seoul is “absolutely rock solid.”
While Yoon’s ruling People Power party said it would oppose the impeachment motion introduced by the opposition on Thursday, the party has been divided over the crisis.
The opposition Democratic party has a majority in parliament but still needs at least eight ruling party lawmakers to back the bill in order for it to pass.
“The Yoon Suk Yeol regime’s declaration of emergency martial law caused great confusion and fear among our people,” Democratic Party lawmaker Kim Seung-won told a session of South Korea’s National Assembly held in the early hours of Thursday.
The martial law declaration late on Tuesday attempted to ban political activity and censor the media in South Korea, which is Asia’s fourth-largest economy and a key US ally. The shock move divided Yoon’s ministers and unleashed six hours of chaos.
None of the 108 ruling party lawmakers were present for the introduction of the impeachment motion. The motion paves the way for a vote to be held in the following 24 to 72 hours.
The impeachment vote follows a night of chaos after Yoon declared martial law and armed troops attempted to force their way into the National Assembly building in Seoul, only to stand back when parliamentary aides sprayed them with fire extinguishers.
“The people and the aides who protected parliament protected us with their bodies. The people won, and it’s now time for us to protect the people,” said Kim.
“We need to immediately suspend the authority of President Yoon. He has committed an indelible, historic crime against the people, whose anxiety needs to be soothed so that they can return to their daily lives“.
Opposition parties need a two-thirds majority to pass the impeachment bill. If it passes, South Korea’s constitutional court will then decide whether to uphold the motion – a process that could take up to 180 days.Opposition parties need a two-thirds majority to pass the impeachment bill. If it passes, South Korea’s constitutional court will then decide whether to uphold the motion – a process that could take up to 180 days.
“The people and the aides who protected parliament protected us with their bodies. The people won, and it’s now time for us to protect the people,” said Democratic Party lawmaker Kim Seung-won.
“We need to immediately suspend the authority of President Yoon. He has committed an indelible, historic crime against the people, whose anxiety needs to be soothed so that they can return to their daily lives.”
If Yoon were to be suspended from exercising power, prime minister Han Duck-soo would fill in as leader.If Yoon were to be suspended from exercising power, prime minister Han Duck-soo would fill in as leader.
If the embattled president resigned or was removed from office, a new election would be held within 60 days.If the embattled president resigned or was removed from office, a new election would be held within 60 days.
Yoon told the nation in a television speech late on Tuesday that martial law was needed to defend the country from pro-North Korean anti-state forces, and protect the free constitutional order, although he cited no specific threats.
Within hours, South Korea’s parliament, with 190 of its 300 members present, unanimously passed a motion for martial law to be lifted, with 18 members of Yoon’s party present.
The president then rescinded the declaration of martial law, around six hours after its proclamation.
“There are opinions that it was too much to go to emergency martial law, and that we did not follow the procedures for emergency martial law, but it was done strictly within the constitutional framework,” a South Korean presidential official told Reuters by telephone.
There was no immediate reaction from North Korea to the drama in the South.There was no immediate reaction from North Korea to the drama in the South.
Yoon had been embraced by leaders in the west as a partner in the US-led effort to unify democracies against growing authoritarianism in China, Russia and elsewhere.Yoon had been embraced by leaders in the west as a partner in the US-led effort to unify democracies against growing authoritarianism in China, Russia and elsewhere.
But he caused unease among South Koreans by branding his critics as “communist totalitarian and anti-state forces”. In November, he denied wrongdoing in response to influence-peddling allegations against him and his wife, and he has taken a hard line against labour unions.But he caused unease among South Koreans by branding his critics as “communist totalitarian and anti-state forces”. In November, he denied wrongdoing in response to influence-peddling allegations against him and his wife, and he has taken a hard line against labour unions.
Reuters contributed to this reportReuters contributed to this report