This article is from the source 'rtcom' and was first published or seen on . The next check for changes will be

You can find the current article at its original source at https://www.rt.com/news/607243-trump-criminal-charges/

The article has changed 2 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 0 Version 1
Criminal charges against Trump could be dropped – NBC Criminal charges against Trump could be dropped – NBC
(about 13 hours later)
Officials have apparently decided that prosecuting a sitting president would be unfeasible, the network claimsOfficials have apparently decided that prosecuting a sitting president would be unfeasible, the network claims
The US Justice Department (DOJ) is reportedly weighing options to shut down its two federal criminal cases against President-elect Donald Trump before he takes office, NBC News reported on Wednesday.The US Justice Department (DOJ) is reportedly weighing options to shut down its two federal criminal cases against President-elect Donald Trump before he takes office, NBC News reported on Wednesday.
Citing anonymous sources, the network reported that officials are considering closing both the January 6 election interference case and the classified documents case, following the DOJ’s long-standing policy that a sitting president cannot be criminally prosecuted.Citing anonymous sources, the network reported that officials are considering closing both the January 6 election interference case and the classified documents case, following the DOJ’s long-standing policy that a sitting president cannot be criminally prosecuted.
The sudden shift has surprised observers, especially given that special counsel Jack Smith had been pushing forward with both without apparent regard for the presidential campaign calendar.The sudden shift has surprised observers, especially given that special counsel Jack Smith had been pushing forward with both without apparent regard for the presidential campaign calendar.
But now, with Trump’s victory confirmed, DOJ officials seem to have accepted the reality that no trial is feasible anytime soon, particularly with complex legal arguments likely headed to the Supreme Court. “Sensible, inevitable, and unfortunate,” remarked former federal prosecutor Chuck Rosenberg to NBC about the potential wind-down.But now, with Trump’s victory confirmed, DOJ officials seem to have accepted the reality that no trial is feasible anytime soon, particularly with complex legal arguments likely headed to the Supreme Court. “Sensible, inevitable, and unfortunate,” remarked former federal prosecutor Chuck Rosenberg to NBC about the potential wind-down.
The sudden pause has raised questions about the DOJ’s independence, with some asking if the legal system’s respect for presidential immunity isn’t also playing into politics. “What happened to the rule of law?” former US attorney Joyce Vance asked, expressing dismay at the reality that Trump may never face legal accountability in these federal cases. The sudden pause has raised questions about the DOJ’s independence, with some asking if the legal system’s respect for presidential immunity isn’t also playing into politics. Former US attorney Joyce Vance expressed dismay at the reality that Trump may never face legal accountability in these federal cases.
“The idea that you could win an election to avoid justice just cuts deeply against my expectations for our legal system and for our politics,” she added. “The idea that you could win an election to avoid justice just cuts so deeply against my expectations for our legal system and for our politics too,” she said.
The DOJ’s contemplation of pulling the plug follows a 2000 memo by the Office of Legal Counsel, which concluded that prosecuting a sitting president would unavoidably interfere with executive branch operations.The DOJ’s contemplation of pulling the plug follows a 2000 memo by the Office of Legal Counsel, which concluded that prosecuting a sitting president would unavoidably interfere with executive branch operations.
Nevertheless, many would see the decision as undercutting America’s much touted “rule of law” image, especially given the charges in question: conspiracy to defraud the US in the election case, and willful retention of national defense information, obstruction of justice, and lying to investigators in the classified documents case.Nevertheless, many would see the decision as undercutting America’s much touted “rule of law” image, especially given the charges in question: conspiracy to defraud the US in the election case, and willful retention of national defense information, obstruction of justice, and lying to investigators in the classified documents case.
Trump’s legal team, meanwhile, has wasted no time strategizing how to fully eliminate his state and federal charges, NBC notes, with New York and Georgia cases posing unique challenges.Trump’s legal team, meanwhile, has wasted no time strategizing how to fully eliminate his state and federal charges, NBC notes, with New York and Georgia cases posing unique challenges.