This article is from the source 'guardian' and was first published or seen on . The next check for changes will be

You can find the current article at its original source at https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2024/oct/31/rachel-reeves-more-money-fix-public-services-ifs-autumn-budget

The article has changed 2 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 0 Version 1
Rachel Reeves may have to find more money to fix public services, says IFS Rachel Reeves may need extra £9bn to avoid cuts to public services, says IFS
(about 3 hours later)
Institute for Fiscal Studies says budget allows for rise in public service spending this year and next, but not thereafter Institute for Fiscal Studies says chancellor may have to revisit tax plans to avoid real-terms cuts in some areas
Rachel Reeves could be forced to find more money to fix public services after her budget made a start at reversing the “unrealistic” and irresponsible spending plans of the Conservatives, the Institute for Fiscal Studies (IFS) has said. Rachel Reeves could need £9bn of further tax increases to avoid a fresh round of austerity for some struggling public services, despite her first budget setting out the largest rise in a generation, the Institute for Fiscal Studies has said.
Britain’s leading experts on the government’s finances said the chancellor’s tax measures on Wednesday had allowed for a substantial short-term increase in public service spending this year and next, but not thereafter. After the chancellor delivered Labour’s first budget in 14 years on Wednesday, the leading experts in public finances said she could be forced to top up her tax plans to avoid real-terms cuts in some areas, including councils, the justice system and prisons.
Paul Johnson, the director of the IFS, said there would need to be “more to come” after Labour’s first budget in 15 years outlined £40bn of tax increases needed for the emergency cash injection. The IFS said that while Reeves had provided a substantial short-term funding boost to unpick “unrealistic” Conservative plans, she had pencilled in cuts to unprotected departments after the next financial year that were more than likely to need revisiting.
Paul Johnson, the director of the IFS, warned that Reeves’s £40bn tax-raising budget would mainly go towards steadying the government finances rather than paving the way for big improvements in public services.
He said the chancellor was gambling that either a short-term splurge in public spending could clear backlogs in the system, helping to bring down future costs, or could be hoping for stronger economic growth to bail the government out. “[But] if nothing else changes in the forecasts, particularly if we continue not to increase petrol duties, I think other taxes will likely have to rise,” he said.
Saying the spending plans amounted to “pretending” that Labour would splurge in the early years before reining in spending in future, he said: “That’s not going to happen. The spending plans will not survive contact with her cabinet colleagues.”Saying the spending plans amounted to “pretending” that Labour would splurge in the early years before reining in spending in future, he said: “That’s not going to happen. The spending plans will not survive contact with her cabinet colleagues.”
“I am willing to bet a substantial sum that day-to-day public service spending will in fact increase more quickly than supposedly planned after next year,” he added.“I am willing to bet a substantial sum that day-to-day public service spending will in fact increase more quickly than supposedly planned after next year,” he added.
The IFS said that while the spending increases announced by Reeves appeared big relative to the previous government’s plans, this was in large part because “their plans were unrealistic”.
Sign up to Business TodaySign up to Business Today
Get set for the working day – we'll point you to all the business news and analysis you need every morningGet set for the working day – we'll point you to all the business news and analysis you need every morning
after newsletter promotionafter newsletter promotion
The IFS said that while the spending increases announced by Reeves appeared big relative to the previous government’s plans, this was in large part because “their plans were unrealistic”.
Johnson said: “Despite the apparent scale of the increases, this is not going to feel like Christmas has come for the public realm.”Johnson said: “Despite the apparent scale of the increases, this is not going to feel like Christmas has come for the public realm.”
In her budget on Wednesday, the chancellor set out a real-terms increase in day-to-day spending on public services of 4.3% this year and 2.6% next year, before pencilling in a rise of 1.3% each year.In her budget on Wednesday, the chancellor set out a real-terms increase in day-to-day spending on public services of 4.3% this year and 2.6% next year, before pencilling in a rise of 1.3% each year.
“It would be odd to increase spending rapidly only to start cutting back again in subsequent years,” Johnson said.“It would be odd to increase spending rapidly only to start cutting back again in subsequent years,” Johnson said.
In the final two budgets set by the Conservatives, Jeremy Hunt, the former chancellor, announced sweeping tax cuts despite ballooning pressures on public services and soaring debt interest payments. In the final two budgets set by the Conservatives, Jeremy Hunt, the then chancellor, announced sweeping tax cuts despite ballooning pressures on public services and soaring debt interest payments.
Johnson said: “To cut £20bn from employee national insurance last year in the face of known fiscal pressures was not responsible.”Johnson said: “To cut £20bn from employee national insurance last year in the face of known fiscal pressures was not responsible.”