This article is from the source 'guardian' and was first published or seen on . The next check for changes will be
You can find the current article at its original source at https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2024/oct/21/martyn-blake-met-police-officer-who-shot-chris-kaba-acquitted
The article has changed 8 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.
| Version 0 | Version 1 |
|---|---|
| Met police officer who shot Chris Kaba acquitted of murder | Met police officer who shot Chris Kaba acquitted of murder |
| (about 2 hours later) | |
| Martyn Blake shot Kaba, who was unarmed, in 2022, saying he feared Kaba would use his Audi to kill officers | Martyn Blake shot Kaba, who was unarmed, in 2022, saying he feared Kaba would use his Audi to kill officers |
| A Metropolitan police armed officer on trial for murder after shooting an unarmed suspect in the head has been acquitted. | A Metropolitan police armed officer on trial for murder after shooting an unarmed suspect in the head has been acquitted. |
| Martyn Blake shot Chris Kaba in September 2022 on a residential street in Streatham, south London. | Martyn Blake shot Chris Kaba in September 2022 on a residential street in Streatham, south London. |
| Kaba, 24, was driving an Audi that police believed was linked to a firearms incident the previous evening, which they followed, then forced to stop. | |
| The not guilty verdict will fuel anger that Blake was put on trial, a decision that infuriated his fellow Met firearms officers as well as the force’s commissioner, Mark Rowley. | The not guilty verdict will fuel anger that Blake was put on trial, a decision that infuriated his fellow Met firearms officers as well as the force’s commissioner, Mark Rowley. |
| The jury took two hours and 59 minutes to reach its verdict. A visibly relieved Blake exhaled as the verdict was delivered. | |
| Kaba’s relatives were feet away. His father, Prosper, had to be helped out of the courtroom after verdict; another relative rocked back and forth. | |
| Blake, 40, was guarded by police colleagues as he left court. The police watchdog will consider whether he should still face disciplinary action for gross misconduct, and an inquest looms. | |
| The Guardian understands that police chiefs have pressed ministers for greater protection from prosecution for firearms officers, which the home secretary, Yvette Cooper, is considering. An announcement may come within days. | |
| Scotland Yard remain on heightened alert in case of trouble and are closely monitoring community tensions. | |
| After the verdict, Rowley said the system for holding police to account was “broken”. The commissioner said: “Sgt Blake made a split-second decision on what he believed was necessary to protect his colleagues and to protect London. The jury decided that was an honestly held belief and the force used was reasonable. | |
| “Any fatal use of force understandably prompts huge concern among communities, particularly in Black communities where trust in policing is low. There remains much for us to do to strengthen confidence in our service, and we know incidents like this place further strain on already challenged relationships. | |
| “No police officer is above the law, but we have been clear the system holding police to account is broken. I worry about the lack of support officers face for doing their best, but most of all I worry for the public. The more we crush the spirit of good officers, the less they can fight crime. That risks London becoming less safe.” | |
| Blake’s suspension would be immediately lifted, Rowley said. | |
| Kaba’s family issued a statement saying they were “devastated”. They said: “The not guilty verdict leaves us with the deep pain of injustice adding to the unbearable sorrow we have felt since Chris was killed. No family should endure the unimaginable grief we have faced. Chris was stolen from us, and this decision shows his life – and many others like him – does not matter to the system. Our son deserved better. | |
| “The acquittal of Martyn Blake isn’t just a failure for our family, but for all those affected by police violence. Despite this verdict, we won’t be silenced. We are deeply grateful to everyone who stood by us and fought for justice. We will continue fighting for Chris, for justice, and for real change. Chris’ life mattered, and nothing can take that away from us.” | |
| The Audi Kaba had been driving was forced to stop and was then surrounded by armed officers who burst out from three police cars and tried to pull the suspect out of his vehicle. | |
| Blake, who was in a police car that blocked the Audi from the front, said he opened fire fearing Kaba would pull an officer under its wheels or run them over trying to escape. | |
| He said the car was being used as a weapon and he had fired in self-defence and also to protect his colleagues, with his primary aim being to “incapacitate” the driver, who was hunched low over the steering wheel. | |
| The prosecution said that the Audi driven by Kaba was blocked within seconds and could not have escaped nor run over officers. | |
| The crown accepted that Kaba made “concerted” efforts to escape police, but his Audi’s top speed during the standoff was 12 miles an hour. | |
| A fellow armed officer said he had also been about to open fire. Officers told of hearing tyre screeches and the Audi’s engine revving. | |
| Police stopped the Audi not knowing who the driver was, only that it was linked to a shooting the night before. | |
| The charging of Blake caused outrage among armed Met officers. They were furious after he was suspended from duty; after he was charged with murder, scores refused to carry weapons. | |
| The Met feared a guilty conviction could have triggered a fresh and potentially bigger rebellion among their firearms officers. | |
| The criminal investigation was carried out by the police watchdog, the Independent Office for Police Conduct (IOPC). | |
| Frank Ferguson, the head of the Crown Prosecution Service’s special crime and counter-terrorism division, said: “We recognise that firearms officers operate under enormous pressure, but it is our responsibility to put cases before a jury that meet our test for prosecution, and we are satisfied that test was met in this case. | |
| “It is therefore right that the case was put before the jury for them to scrutinise and to decide.” |