This article is from the source 'bbc' and was first published or seen on . The next check for changes will be

You can find the current article at its original source at https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-68431830

The article has changed 7 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 2 Version 3
Trump immunity claim: Top US court agrees to hear case in April Trump immunity claim: Top US court agrees to hear case in April
(about 3 hours later)
The Supreme Court will decide if ex-President Donald Trump is immune from being prosecuted on charges of trying to overturn the 2020 election.The Supreme Court will decide if ex-President Donald Trump is immune from being prosecuted on charges of trying to overturn the 2020 election.
The 6-3 conservative majority court decided on Wednesday to hear Mr Trump's claims that he should be shielded from criminal liability. The 6-3 conservative majority court said it will hear arguments in April. A ruling could come by the end of June.
The ruling marks the first time the court has weighed in on such a case. A US Court of Appeals panel has already rejected Mr Trump's argument.
A US Court of Appeals panel has already rejected Mr Trump's argument that he enjoys presidential immunity. He had claimed in the landmark legal case that he was immune from all criminal charges for acts that he said fell within his duties as president.
Mr Trump had claimed in the landmark legal case that he was immune from all criminal charges for acts he said fell within his duties as president. The Supreme Court taking the case is being seen as a victory for the former president as it increases the chances that his trial may not happen before November's presidential election.
But the appeals court ruled unanimously against the 77-year-old, writing that: "We cannot accept former President Trump's claim that a president has unbounded authority to commit crimes that would neutralise the most fundamental check on executive power - the recognition and implementation of election results." On his Truth Social site, Mr Trump welcomed Wednesday's decision and contended that without immunity presidents could be "paralyzed, by the prospect of wrongful prosecution and retaliation after they leave office".
He appealed the case to the Supreme Court and asked to put that decision on hold. Donald Trump was charged last year with witness tampering and conspiracy to defraud the US over his attempts to overturn his 2020 election loss to Joe Biden.
On his Truth Social site, Mr Trump welcomed Wednesday's decision and contended that without immunity "Presidents will always be concerned, and even paralyzed, by the prospect of wrongful prosecution and retaliation after they leave office".
"This could actually lead to the extortion and blackmail of a President," he wrote.
Mr Trump was charged last year with witness tampering and conspiracy to defraud the US in federal court in Washington DC over his attempts to overturn his 2020 election loss to Joe Biden.
Jack Smith, who was appointed as special counsel in the investigation, brought the charges against Mr Trump, and pushed for the trial to be held this year.Jack Smith, who was appointed as special counsel in the investigation, brought the charges against Mr Trump, and pushed for the trial to be held this year.
The court could have let the appellate court judgement stand, which would have allowed the trial proceedings to resume. When Mr Trump claimed immunity, Mr Smith asked the Supreme Court to take up that question but in January they declined and it fell to the federal appeals court in Washington.
The appeals court rejected his immunity arguments earlier this month, ruling unanimously against the 77-year-old.
"We cannot accept former President Trump's claim that a president has unbounded authority to commit crimes that would neutralise the most fundamental check on executive power - the recognition and implementation of election results," it wrote.
A guide to Trump's four criminal cases
Illinois judge kicks Trump off primary ballot
The Supreme Court could have let the appellate court judgement stand, which would have allowed the trial proceedings to resume.
Instead, a minimum of four of the nine justices voted to take up the case. That suggests that there is some debate within the court on whether Mr Trump has some immunity from prosecution.Instead, a minimum of four of the nine justices voted to take up the case. That suggests that there is some debate within the court on whether Mr Trump has some immunity from prosecution.
The decision has the potential to seriously delay the trial, which was originally scheduled for March. The trial was originally scheduled for March but arguments in the Supreme Court case are now due for the week of 22 April, and any trial will have to wait until after a decision is made.
Arguments in the Supreme Court case are scheduled for the week of 22 April, and any trial will have to wait until after a decision is made. Although a decision could come swiftly, the justices may rule that the former president is immune from prosecution, or issue a decision that further delays legal action.
Although a decision could come swiftly, the justices could rule that the former president is immune from prosecution, or issue a decision that further delays legal action.
Justice Department guidelines limit prosecutorial action in politically sensitive investigations from within 60 days of an election - meaning prosecutors face a deadline of early September.Justice Department guidelines limit prosecutorial action in politically sensitive investigations from within 60 days of an election - meaning prosecutors face a deadline of early September.
And if Mr Trump wins in November, there is a growing possibility that the case never reaches trial. His Justice Department officials could drop or indefinitely suspend the special counsel investigation or he could take the unprecedented step of issuing a pardon for himself. And if Mr Trump wins in November, there is a growing possibility that the case never reaches trial. His Justice Department officials could drop or indefinitely suspend the special counsel investigation, or he could take the unprecedented step of issuing a pardon for himself.
The Republican front-runner candidate for president is facing a host of other federal and state criminal charges.The Republican front-runner candidate for president is facing a host of other federal and state criminal charges.
The former president is facing a trial starting in late March on charges of falsifying business records over hush-money payment he made to a porn star. The first trial he will face will be in late March on charges of falsifying business records over hush-money payments his lawyer made to a porn star.
The Supreme Court is also hearing arguments in a separate case weighing whether Mr Trump can be disqualified from running for a second term under the 14th Amendment's "insurrection ban."The Supreme Court is also hearing arguments in a separate case weighing whether Mr Trump can be disqualified from running for a second term under the 14th Amendment's "insurrection ban."
Mr Trump has pleaded not guilty in all the cases, frequently referring to them as political "witch hunts". Donald Trump has pleaded not guilty in all the cases, frequently referring to them as political "witch hunts".
More on the US election
Explained: A simple guide to the US 2024 election
Analysis: Where Biden v Trump will be won and lost
Policies: What a Trump second term would look like
Economy: Voters feel better - will that help Biden?
Recap: The Trump life story to date
Related TopicsRelated Topics
US Supreme CourtUS Supreme Court
Indictments of Donald TrumpIndictments of Donald Trump
Donald TrumpDonald Trump