This article is from the source 'guardian' and was first published or seen on . The next check for changes will be

You can find the current article at its original source at https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2023/dec/19/foreign-policy-david-cameron-immediate-gaza-ceasefire

The article has changed 4 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 1 Version 2
‘Morally indefensible’: experts urge Cameron to back instant Gaza ceasefire MPs clash in Commons as government urged to back instant Gaza ceasefire
(about 5 hours later)
Foreign secretary is told failure to call for immediate ceasefire is also ‘strategically ill-advised’, as UN vote approaches Lib Dem MP Layla Moran describes desperate plight of relatives in Gaza after she was granted urgent question on situation
Foreign policy experts including a former head of the armed forces have urged David Cameron to back an “immediate ceasefire” in Gaza in the run-up to a crucial UN security council vote. The Liberal Democrat MP Layla Moran has made an impassioned plea in the House of Commons for the government to back an immediate ceasefire in Gaza as she told of the desperate plight of relatives who had taken refuge in a church there.
The failure to call for a ceasefire was “strategically ill-advised and morally indefensible”, the British foreign secretary was told in a letter, as senior Conservatives also added to pressure on the government for a shift in its approach to the conflict. Those inside the Holy Family parish in Gaza City were down to their last can of corn, she told the development minister, Andrew Mitchell, who will meet her on Wednesday. Two women were allegedly killed by an Israeli military sniper in the church on Saturday.
Cameron will call for increased coordination between allies to address the “desperate” humanitarian situation, and use a trip to Paris and Rome on Tuesday to reiterate his call for a sustainable ceasefire in Gaza. But the spotlight falls on a UN security council meeting after the US vetoed a previous attempt to pass a ceasefire motion. “The people in this church are civilians. They have nothing to do with Hamas. They are nuns, orphans, disabled people. They are a small community who know everyone. It is categorically untrue to say Hamas are operating from there,” she told MPs after she was granted an urgent question on the situation in Gaza.
Mitchell told parliament he hoped that the UK would be able to support a UN security council resolution vote at 3pm (UK time) to call for a ceasefire. While the UK had abstained from a previous vote, whether it would support another one was dependent on the text, he added.
The sometimes bitter fault lines that the conflict has created within both the Conservatives and Labour were once again laid bare as Tory MPs clashed on the question of a supporting a ceasefire.
Flick Drummond, a Conservative MP among a grouping who added pressure on the government for a shift in its approach to the conflict, said on Tuesday morning that an “annihilation” was taking place in Gaza. She shook her head as her colleague Andrew Percy said it was almost as if some MPs did not want Israel to succeed in wiping out Hamas.
Mitchell said he did not agree with the former immigration minister Robert Jenrick, who said “talk of a sustainable ceasefire was unhelpful” and that the Israel Defense Forces (IDF) “should be allowed to finish the job”.
“We are working towards a sustainable ceasefire. We are not there yet. We should all be working towards it,” said Mitchell, who added that the UK wanted to see a more “surgical approach” by Israeli forces.
Foreign policy experts including a former head of the armed forces have meanwhile urged David Cameron to back an “immediate ceasefire” in Gaza in the run-up to Tuesday’s crucial UN security council vote.
The failure to call for a ceasefire was “strategically ill-advised and morally indefensible”, the British foreign secretary was told in a letter.
Cameron will call for increased coordination between allies to address the “desperate” humanitarian situation, and use a trip to Paris and Rome on Tuesday to reiterate his call for a sustainable ceasefire in Gaza. But the spotlight falls on the UN security council meeting after the US vetoed a previous attempt to pass a ceasefire motion.
“The UK does not have to follow America’s lead – particularly when US public and opinion is far from united,” says the letter from Gen Lord David Richards, a former head of the armed forces, and others including six former UK ambassadors.“The UK does not have to follow America’s lead – particularly when US public and opinion is far from united,” says the letter from Gen Lord David Richards, a former head of the armed forces, and others including six former UK ambassadors.
They welcomed the “slight positive change in tone” last week, adding: “We implore the United Kingdom to once again work with all members of the UN security council to ensure a renewed resolution for an immediate ceasefire is brought forward, and then to vote in favour of it.”They welcomed the “slight positive change in tone” last week, adding: “We implore the United Kingdom to once again work with all members of the UN security council to ensure a renewed resolution for an immediate ceasefire is brought forward, and then to vote in favour of it.”
Their intervention came as a group of Tory MPs, including three former cabinet ministers, wrote to Cameron to tell him the case for an immediate ceasefire was “unanswerable”. Rishi Sunak told MPs on the Commons liaison committee that he did not want the Israel-Gaza conflict to last “a moment longer than it has to”, when asked if the UK would back a United Nations resolution on ceasefire.
One of those MPs, Flick Drummond, told Times Radio on Tuesday that what was happening in Gaza was an annihilation, while the influential Conservative chair of the foreign affairs committee, Alicia Kearns, said Israel’s operation had “gone beyond self-defence” and it had lost the moral authority in its war with Hamas. He said it was “clear that too many innocent civilians have died” in Gaza, adding that UK had “repeatedly” urged Israel to show restraint. Pressed over whether Israel had broken international law in its pounding of Gaza, he suggested that Hamas was responsible for hiding amid the civilian population.The prime minister denied that cuts to the UK’s aid budget had contributed to attacks by Houthi rebels in Yemen on commercial shipping in the Red Sea.
“Bombs don’t obliterate an ideology and neither can a stable state be constructed from oblivion,” Kearns wrote in Tuesday’s Telegraph.
The challenges the conflict poses to the position of the main political parties was illustrated as Labour was also again pressed on its approach. Asked whether the party backed the call for an immediate ceasefire, Darren Jones, the shadow chief secretary to the Treasury, said “of course” Labour wanted to get to a position “where a long-lasting ceasefire can be put in place”.
He added: “But ceasefires only happen because the people fighting each other agree to it. That’s why the diplomatic efforts are so important to securing that outcome.”
The prime minister, Rishi Sunak, shifted his language last week to call for a “sustainable ceasefire”, calling for Hamas to stop firing rockets into Israel and release its hostages in exchange for aid.
The vote in New York had been due on Monday. The US said it could not support a reference to a “cessation of hostilities” but may accept a call for a “suspension of hostilities”.
The Arab countries negotiating the text said they had been encouraged to see that the White House was apparently trying to find wording that it could support, as opposed to simply vetoing resolutions.