This article is from the source 'nytimes' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at https://www.nytimes.com/2023/12/06/world/europe/uk-boris-johnson-covid-inquiry.html

The article has changed 15 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 12 Version 13
Boris Johnson Apologizes at U.K. Covid Inquiry for ‘Pain and Suffering’ Boris Johnson Apologizes at U.K. Covid Inquiry for ‘Pain and Suffering’
(about 8 hours later)
Regretful but unruffled, Boris Johnson acknowledged on Wednesday that as Britain’s prime minister during the pandemic, he had underestimated the emerging threat of the coronavirus in early 2020. But he rejected suggestions that his government’s initially sluggish response had driven up Britain’s death toll.Regretful but unruffled, Boris Johnson acknowledged on Wednesday that as Britain’s prime minister during the pandemic, he had underestimated the emerging threat of the coronavirus in early 2020. But he rejected suggestions that his government’s initially sluggish response had driven up Britain’s death toll.
Speaking before an official inquiry into the government’s handling of the crisis, Mr. Johnson apologized for “the pain and suffering and the loss” of those who died from Covid, and of their families. He said the families deserved answers, as he submitted to two days of grilling about his leadership and judgment during those frantic days.Speaking before an official inquiry into the government’s handling of the crisis, Mr. Johnson apologized for “the pain and suffering and the loss” of those who died from Covid, and of their families. He said the families deserved answers, as he submitted to two days of grilling about his leadership and judgment during those frantic days.
“There are clearly things that we could have done, and should have done, if we’d known and understood how this was spreading,” Mr. Johnson said. “We collectively should have twigged much sooner” to the rapidly looming danger posed by the virus, he added. “I should have twigged.”“There are clearly things that we could have done, and should have done, if we’d known and understood how this was spreading,” Mr. Johnson said. “We collectively should have twigged much sooner” to the rapidly looming danger posed by the virus, he added. “I should have twigged.”
Still, Mr. Johnson said he was doubtful that acting earlier would have made a big difference. He sparred with the committee’s chief counsel, Hugo Keith, over whether Britain’s death toll, currently at 230,193, placed it among the worst-hit European countries, or merely in the middle. (Britain’s per capita death rate is higher than that of France or Germany, and only marginally lower than that of Italy, the European country most ravaged in the first wave of infections.)Still, Mr. Johnson said he was doubtful that acting earlier would have made a big difference. He sparred with the committee’s chief counsel, Hugo Keith, over whether Britain’s death toll, currently at 230,193, placed it among the worst-hit European countries, or merely in the middle. (Britain’s per capita death rate is higher than that of France or Germany, and only marginally lower than that of Italy, the European country most ravaged in the first wave of infections.)
Mr. Johnson, whose time in office was defined and ultimately derailed by the pandemic, was the most eagerly anticipated witness so far in the inquiry, an independent, public examination of Britain’s response to Covid-19, led by a former judge, Heather Hallett, that is expected to continue until 2026.
His daylong testimony mixed references to epidemiological data with detours into the locker-room language used by Mr. Johnson and his aides. Though there were no startling revelations, it added up to a revealing glimpse into how Britain’s leaders groped for a remedy to a once-in-a-century health crisis.