This article is from the source 'nytimes' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at https://www.nytimes.com/2023/12/06/world/europe/uk-boris-johnson-covid-inquiry.html

The article has changed 15 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 1 Version 2
Boris Johnson to Face Tough Questions at U.K. Covid Inquiry Boris Johnson Apologizes at U.K. Covid Inquiry for ‘Pain and Suffering’
(32 minutes later)
Boris Johnson, the former British prime minister whose tenure was dominated and ultimately derailed by the coronavirus pandemic, was testifying on Wednesday before an official inquiry into his government’s handling of the crisis. Boris Johnson, the former British prime minister whose tenure was dominated and ultimately derailed by the coronavirus pandemic, apologized on Wednesday “for the pain and suffering and the loss” of those who died from the virus, as well as their families.
Mr. Johnson will face hard questions about whether he waited too long to impose a lockdown as the virus engulfed Britain in March 2020. And he is likely to have to answer again for Downing Street social gatherings that violated lockdown rules — a scandal that forced him out of office after a parliamentary committee concluded that he had deliberately misled lawmakers about his attendance at some of those parties. Speaking before an official inquiry into his government’s handling of the crisis, Mr. Johnson said he hoped the investigation would “help get the answers to the very difficult questions that the families of the victims are rightfully asking.”
Mr. Johnson is expected to confess mistakes, particularly in the early days of the pandemic. But he is also expected to argue that he got other things right, not least the rollout of a vaccine, which was among the fastest in any major country, as well as his decision to reopen Britain’s economy in the summer of 2021. Mr. Johnson was facing hard questions about whether he waited too long to impose a lockdown as the virus engulfed Britain in March 2020. And he was likely to have to answer again for Downing Street social gatherings that violated lockdown rules — a scandal that forced him out of office after a parliamentary committee concluded that he had deliberately misled lawmakers about his attendance at some of those parties.
Mr. Johnson was expected to confess mistakes, particularly in the early days of the pandemic. But he was also expected to argue that he got other things right, not least the rollout of a vaccine, which was among the fastest in any major country, as well as his decision to reopen Britain’s economy in the summer of 2021.
The former prime minister is the most eagerly anticipated witness so far in the Covid-19 inquiry, an independent, public examination of Britain’s response to the pandemic, led by a former judge, Heather Hallett, that is expected to continue until 2026. But he is not the last marquee name to face the committee.The former prime minister is the most eagerly anticipated witness so far in the Covid-19 inquiry, an independent, public examination of Britain’s response to the pandemic, led by a former judge, Heather Hallett, that is expected to continue until 2026. But he is not the last marquee name to face the committee.
In fact, Mr. Johnson may prove to be merely a warm-up act for the current prime minister, Rishi Sunak, who served as chancellor of the Exchequer under Mr. Johnson and will face questions about his performance during the crisis.In fact, Mr. Johnson may prove to be merely a warm-up act for the current prime minister, Rishi Sunak, who served as chancellor of the Exchequer under Mr. Johnson and will face questions about his performance during the crisis.
The two days of testimony, experts said, will give Mr. Johnson a chance to explain how he navigated between ministers like Mr. Sunak, who warned about the damage of shutting down Britain’s economy, and influential aides like Dominic Cummings, who urged Mr. Johnson to impose swift, prolonged lockdowns. The two days of testimony, experts said, were a chance for Mr. Johnson to explain how he navigated between ministers like Mr. Sunak, who warned about the damage of shutting down Britain’s economy, and influential aides like Dominic Cummings, who urged Mr. Johnson to impose swift, prolonged lockdowns.
Critics have faulted Mr. Johnson for careening from one strategy to another and failing to stick with decisions. “Some of that flip-flopping was him listening to Rishi Sunak one day and Dominic Cummings the next,” said Devi Sridhar, a professor of global public health at the University of Edinburgh.Critics have faulted Mr. Johnson for careening from one strategy to another and failing to stick with decisions. “Some of that flip-flopping was him listening to Rishi Sunak one day and Dominic Cummings the next,” said Devi Sridhar, a professor of global public health at the University of Edinburgh.
Much of the public attention so far has focused on the infighting in the government. That has led some experts to express concern that the inquiry was not doing enough to set out lessons that would allow Britain to avoid missteps in the next pandemic.Much of the public attention so far has focused on the infighting in the government. That has led some experts to express concern that the inquiry was not doing enough to set out lessons that would allow Britain to avoid missteps in the next pandemic.
“Where does this leave us, beyond trying to elect a different prime minister the next time?” Professor Sridhar said.“Where does this leave us, beyond trying to elect a different prime minister the next time?” Professor Sridhar said.