This article is from the source 'nytimes' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at https://www.nytimes.com/2023/10/22/briefing/martin-scorseses-new-film.html

The article has changed 6 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 4 Version 5
Martin Scorsese’s New Film Martin Scorsese’s New Film
(about 2 months later)
It’s not your imagination: Movies really are getting longer. The average blockbuster now runs thirty minutes more than films did in the 1990s, a recent Economist survey found.It’s not your imagination: Movies really are getting longer. The average blockbuster now runs thirty minutes more than films did in the 1990s, a recent Economist survey found.
Martin Scorsese’s highly anticipated new film, “Killers of the Flower Moon,” is in theaters this weekend. And at three-and-a-half hours long, it serves as further proof of the swelling moviegoing experience. In this case, though, fretting over the run-time might belie the thoughtfulness of Scorsese’s creation.Martin Scorsese’s highly anticipated new film, “Killers of the Flower Moon,” is in theaters this weekend. And at three-and-a-half hours long, it serves as further proof of the swelling moviegoing experience. In this case, though, fretting over the run-time might belie the thoughtfulness of Scorsese’s creation.
The film, adapted from a best-selling nonfiction book by David Grann, is about the murders of members of the Osage Nation, a Native American tribe in Oklahoma, in the 1920s. The Osage became extremely wealthy after oil was discovered on their land — placing them on a receiving end of a rapacious conspiracy. The Times’s chief movie critic Manohla Dargis calls it a “heartbreaking masterpiece.”The film, adapted from a best-selling nonfiction book by David Grann, is about the murders of members of the Osage Nation, a Native American tribe in Oklahoma, in the 1920s. The Osage became extremely wealthy after oil was discovered on their land — placing them on a receiving end of a rapacious conspiracy. The Times’s chief movie critic Manohla Dargis calls it a “heartbreaking masterpiece.”
Yet the adaptation is not an exercise in strict fidelity. Both the book and movie tell a story of violence, and of the ensuing investigation by an F.B.I. agent dispatched by J. Edgar Hoover. But Scorsese and his collaborators wanted to examine more closely the heart of the story: the Osage.Yet the adaptation is not an exercise in strict fidelity. Both the book and movie tell a story of violence, and of the ensuing investigation by an F.B.I. agent dispatched by J. Edgar Hoover. But Scorsese and his collaborators wanted to examine more closely the heart of the story: the Osage.
The shift away from straight police procedural came two years into the writing process, after a discussion with Leonardo DiCaprio. “I think Marty and I just looked at each other and we felt there was no soul to it,” DiCaprio told The Times. Or, as Scorsese put it in a Time interview: “I realized I was making a movie about all the white guys.”
The perspective switch prompted Scorsese to meet with the Osage nation. “I got them to understand that I wanted to do the best I could with them and the story, and that they could trust me, I hoped,” he told The New Yorker.