This article is from the source 'rtcom' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at https://www.rt.com/news/567802-san-francisco-police-killer-robots/

The article has changed 3 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 0 Version 1
US city changes mind on ‘killer’ police robots US city changes mind on ‘killer’ police robots
(37 minutes later)
San Francisco police previously suggested outfitting robots with explosives in “extreme” casesSan Francisco police previously suggested outfitting robots with explosives in “extreme” cases
Officials in San Francisco, California have reversed course just days after voting to allow local law enforcement to deploy robots to kill suspects under certain circumstances, temporarily rescinding the authorization until another vote set for next week.Officials in San Francisco, California have reversed course just days after voting to allow local law enforcement to deploy robots to kill suspects under certain circumstances, temporarily rescinding the authorization until another vote set for next week.
The San Francisco Board of Supervisors voted unanimously to suspend the move on Tuesday, making an about-face after an 8-3 vote last week to let police use robots as a “deadly force option when risk of loss of life to members of the public or officers is imminent.”The San Francisco Board of Supervisors voted unanimously to suspend the move on Tuesday, making an about-face after an 8-3 vote last week to let police use robots as a “deadly force option when risk of loss of life to members of the public or officers is imminent.”
“We just stopped the use of killer robots in [San Francisco]. Complete reversal from last week. Common sense prevailed,” Supervisor Hillary Ronen wrote in a tweet later in the evening. “We just stopped the use of killer robots in [San Francisco]. Complete reversal from last week. Common sense prevailed,” Supervisor Hillary Ronen wrote in a tweet later in the evening. 
Because local law requires the board to vote two times on the same piece of legislation, the new ban will be taken up again for another vote next week. However, the city’s Rules Committee has vowed to reevaluate the policy altogether following vocal public backlash, including a recent protest rally joined by city supervisors. Because local law requires the board to vote twice on the same piece of legislation, the new ban will be taken up again for another vote next week. However, the city’s Rules Committee has vowed to re-evaluate the policy altogether following a vocal public backlash, including a recent protest rally joined by city supervisors.
Some officials, including Supervisor Dean Preston, said they felt last week’s vote was rushed, arguing that residents did not have enough time to evaluate the measure and make their views known before it was passed.Some officials, including Supervisor Dean Preston, said they felt last week’s vote was rushed, arguing that residents did not have enough time to evaluate the measure and make their views known before it was passed.
While the city is required to give the lethal force provision another vote, they approved the rest of the ordinance in question, which lays out how the San Francisco Police Department can employ the robots and other military-style gear. The SFPD owns 17 robots, though five of them are currently not operational, according to an inventory sheet seen by Fox News. While the city is required to give the lethal force provision another vote, they approved the rest of the ordinance, which lays out how the San Francisco Police Department can employ the robots and other military-style gear. The SFPD owns 17 robots, though five of them are currently not operational, according to an inventory sheet seen by Fox News.
The police department previously said it had no plans to mount firearms on its robots, but suggested the devices might be used to kill in “extreme circumstances,” for example by delivering an “explosive charge to breach a structure containing a violent or armed subject.”The police department previously said it had no plans to mount firearms on its robots, but suggested the devices might be used to kill in “extreme circumstances,” for example by delivering an “explosive charge to breach a structure containing a violent or armed subject.”
That example mirrored a real-life case in Dallas, Texas in 2016, when officers outfitted a robot with a bomb to end a standoff with a gunman who had shot 14 police officers, five of them fatally. The shooter was killed immediately, though the bot reportedly remained functional after the incident.That example mirrored a real-life case in Dallas, Texas in 2016, when officers outfitted a robot with a bomb to end a standoff with a gunman who had shot 14 police officers, five of them fatally. The shooter was killed immediately, though the bot reportedly remained functional after the incident.