This article is from the source 'guardian' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.
You can find the current article at its original source at https://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/2022/nov/09/not-fit-for-purpose-government-looks-to-amend-antiquated-referendum-laws-ahead-of-voice-vote
The article has changed 3 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.
| Version 0 | Version 1 |
|---|---|
| ‘Not fit for purpose’: government looks to amend ‘antiquated’ referendum laws ahead of voice vote | ‘Not fit for purpose’: government looks to amend ‘antiquated’ referendum laws ahead of voice vote |
| (3 months later) | |
| Linda Burney says government will propose changes to modernise the century-old act before the end of the year | Linda Burney says government will propose changes to modernise the century-old act before the end of the year |
| A leading constitutional expert says Australia’s century-old laws around referendums are “not fit for purpose”, suggesting the government could look to amend rules around donations, funding disclosures and social media advertising before the voice to parliament vote. | A leading constitutional expert says Australia’s century-old laws around referendums are “not fit for purpose”, suggesting the government could look to amend rules around donations, funding disclosures and social media advertising before the voice to parliament vote. |
| Linda Burney, the minister for Indigenous Australians, said the government would propose changes to “modernise” the Referendum Act before the end of the year, and promised a civics campaign and more information about the voice campaign in early 2023. | Linda Burney, the minister for Indigenous Australians, said the government would propose changes to “modernise” the Referendum Act before the end of the year, and promised a civics campaign and more information about the voice campaign in early 2023. |
| Sign up for Guardian Australia’s free morning and afternoon email newsletters for your daily news roundup | Sign up for Guardian Australia’s free morning and afternoon email newsletters for your daily news roundup |
| Sign up for Guardian Australia’s free morning and afternoon email newsletters for your daily news roundup | Sign up for Guardian Australia’s free morning and afternoon email newsletters for your daily news roundup |
| Prof George Williams, a University of New South Wales legal academic and member of the government’s constitutional expert group on the voice, said referendum rules should be updated before the vote in the next financial year. | Prof George Williams, a University of New South Wales legal academic and member of the government’s constitutional expert group on the voice, said referendum rules should be updated before the vote in the next financial year. |
| “Some of these laws go back to the 1920s. It’s just not fit for purpose,” he said. | “Some of these laws go back to the 1920s. It’s just not fit for purpose,” he said. |
| The government has set up three separate expert groups around the proposed referendum, including a working group, an engagement group, and the constitutional group. The latter – including Uluru statement from the heart co-chair Megan Davis, Indigenous leader Noel Pearson, University of Sydney academic Professor Anne Twomey and Williams among others – met for the first time on 28 October. Following a working group meeting the same day, Burney’s office issued a communique saying the group supported changes to bring the Referendum Act “into line with the Electoral Act”. | The government has set up three separate expert groups around the proposed referendum, including a working group, an engagement group, and the constitutional group. The latter – including Uluru statement from the heart co-chair Megan Davis, Indigenous leader Noel Pearson, University of Sydney academic Professor Anne Twomey and Williams among others – met for the first time on 28 October. Following a working group meeting the same day, Burney’s office issued a communique saying the group supported changes to bring the Referendum Act “into line with the Electoral Act”. |
| During a speech at the National Press Club last month, the attorney general, Mark Dreyfus, called Australia’s referendum processes “very antiquated”. | During a speech at the National Press Club last month, the attorney general, Mark Dreyfus, called Australia’s referendum processes “very antiquated”. |
| Williams said the current Referendum Act contains provisions dating to 1912, including limits on pre-poll voting, and the distribution of a pamphlet to all Australians containing 2,000 words written by the Yes and No campaigns to convince voters. Williams said these provisions could be considered outdated, while more recent considerations like campaign finance, truth in advertising and misinformation were not covered. | Williams said the current Referendum Act contains provisions dating to 1912, including limits on pre-poll voting, and the distribution of a pamphlet to all Australians containing 2,000 words written by the Yes and No campaigns to convince voters. Williams said these provisions could be considered outdated, while more recent considerations like campaign finance, truth in advertising and misinformation were not covered. |
| “There have been updates, but much of it remains from that time. It means we have rules that have yet to be adapted for radio or television, let alone social media,” he said. | “There have been updates, but much of it remains from that time. It means we have rules that have yet to be adapted for radio or television, let alone social media,” he said. |
| “The laws are just not fit for purpose anymore … The idea you have a written pamphlet of information rather than the internet just doesn’t make sense, it’s out of date.” | “The laws are just not fit for purpose anymore … The idea you have a written pamphlet of information rather than the internet just doesn’t make sense, it’s out of date.” |
| Williams said rules should be updated to allow for the provision of “neutral” campaign detail about the constitutional change, not merely “partisan” information from the respective campaigns. He added that considerations around truth in political advertising, as well as regulation of political finance related to the referendum, should also be examined. | Williams said rules should be updated to allow for the provision of “neutral” campaign detail about the constitutional change, not merely “partisan” information from the respective campaigns. He added that considerations around truth in political advertising, as well as regulation of political finance related to the referendum, should also be examined. |
| “Will it be a free for all? Will there be caps on donations and expenditure?” Williams said. | “Will it be a free for all? Will there be caps on donations and expenditure?” Williams said. |
| “It’s appropriate people can raise and spend money, but we don’t want this to become an arms race.” | “It’s appropriate people can raise and spend money, but we don’t want this to become an arms race.” |
| Dreyfus told the National Press Club the government was examining how to achieve “transparency in donations”, suggesting greater safeguards even than those in federal elections. | Dreyfus told the National Press Club the government was examining how to achieve “transparency in donations”, suggesting greater safeguards even than those in federal elections. |
| A spokesperson for Dreyfus wouldn’t comment on what changes could be made to the Referendum Act, only saying the government was “considering amendments to modernise” it. | A spokesperson for Dreyfus wouldn’t comment on what changes could be made to the Referendum Act, only saying the government was “considering amendments to modernise” it. |
| However, government sources suggested some provisions in the act were “archaic”. | However, government sources suggested some provisions in the act were “archaic”. |
| Sign up to Guardian Australia's Morning Mail | Sign up to Guardian Australia's Morning Mail |
| Our Australian morning briefing email breaks down the key national and international stories of the day and why they matter | Our Australian morning briefing email breaks down the key national and international stories of the day and why they matter |
| after newsletter promotion | |
| Williams could not comment on any discussions inside the constitutional group. He said he didn’t believe the group would be asked to give advice on updating the Referendum Act, but to provide guidance on the constitutional ramifications of the referendum question itself. | Williams could not comment on any discussions inside the constitutional group. He said he didn’t believe the group would be asked to give advice on updating the Referendum Act, but to provide guidance on the constitutional ramifications of the referendum question itself. |
| “Technical advice on the wording implications and risk, that’s what I’d anticipate. In the constitution, the choice of a single word can have a big impact,” he said. | “Technical advice on the wording implications and risk, that’s what I’d anticipate. In the constitution, the choice of a single word can have a big impact,” he said. |
| Dreyfus also declined to comment on the deliberations of the group. | Dreyfus also declined to comment on the deliberations of the group. |
| “The Constitutional Expert Group has been established to provide legal support to the Referendum Working Group on constitutional matters relating to the referendum. The matters discussed by the Expert Group will be determined by the Working Group,” the spokesperson said. | “The Constitutional Expert Group has been established to provide legal support to the Referendum Working Group on constitutional matters relating to the referendum. The matters discussed by the Expert Group will be determined by the Working Group,” the spokesperson said. |
| Burney told ABC Radio National on Monday that amendments to the Referendum Act would be introduced before year’s end. Guardian Australia understands this could occur in the final week of parliament in late November. | Burney told ABC Radio National on Monday that amendments to the Referendum Act would be introduced before year’s end. Guardian Australia understands this could occur in the final week of parliament in late November. |
| “There is a very sizeable civics campaign that we need to undertake … There is a lot of work to do in getting people up to speed with what a referendum is,” Burney told Radio National. | “There is a very sizeable civics campaign that we need to undertake … There is a lot of work to do in getting people up to speed with what a referendum is,” Burney told Radio National. |
| “What you will see in the first half of next year, and it won’t be run by the government … is some very major efforts in terms of the campaign towards the referendum.” | “What you will see in the first half of next year, and it won’t be run by the government … is some very major efforts in terms of the campaign towards the referendum.” |
| Responding to criticisms that there was not enough detail about the voice, including its membership and functions, Burney said “there’s a lot happening behind the scenes”. | Responding to criticisms that there was not enough detail about the voice, including its membership and functions, Burney said “there’s a lot happening behind the scenes”. |
| Burney said there would be government funding for a civics campaign, but that a decision hadn’t been reached on funding for the respective sides of the campaign. | Burney said there would be government funding for a civics campaign, but that a decision hadn’t been reached on funding for the respective sides of the campaign. |
| Government sources said it may be unlikely the government would fund a No campaign, suggesting no public funding for either side was a likely outcome. | Government sources said it may be unlikely the government would fund a No campaign, suggesting no public funding for either side was a likely outcome. |