This article is from the source 'nytimes' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.
You can find the current article at its original source at https://www.nytimes.com/2022/10/18/nyregion/lafarge-cement-isis-terrorism.html
The article has changed 4 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.
| Version 0 | Version 1 |
|---|---|
| French Cement Company to Pay $780 Million Over Payoffs to ISIS | French Cement Company to Pay $780 Million Over Payoffs to ISIS |
| (about 1 hour later) | |
| The Justice Department has reached a roughly $780 million criminal plea agreement with a French cement company that paid off the Islamic State terrorist group in order to continue operating in Syria in 2013 and 2014 — at a time when the group was abducting and murdering journalists and aid workers. | The Justice Department has reached a roughly $780 million criminal plea agreement with a French cement company that paid off the Islamic State terrorist group in order to continue operating in Syria in 2013 and 2014 — at a time when the group was abducting and murdering journalists and aid workers. |
| Executives with Lafarge, which is based in Paris, agreed to the deal after paying more than $5 million to Islamic State leaders and urging them to help the company keep its production facilities running, according to a company spokesman and law enforcement official. | Executives with Lafarge, which is based in Paris, agreed to the deal after paying more than $5 million to Islamic State leaders and urging them to help the company keep its production facilities running, according to a company spokesman and law enforcement official. |
| The agreement with Lafarge, a subsidiary of the Switzerland-based Holcim Group with expansive operations in the United States, is by far the largest penalty paid by a private company charged with providing material support to a terrorist organization. The company pleaded guilty in federal court in Brooklyn on Tuesday to a single count of conspiracy to provide material support to a foreign terrorist organization. | |
| The company’s lawyers have argued in French courts that Lafarge’s efforts were not intended to assist the Islamic State but to ensure its operations continued. | |
| Justice Department officials had been quietly pursuing their own case against the company under a federal criminal law that prohibits people or businesses from harboring or collaborating with people they know to be terrorists. | Justice Department officials had been quietly pursuing their own case against the company under a federal criminal law that prohibits people or businesses from harboring or collaborating with people they know to be terrorists. |
| The chief executive of Lafarge appeared in federal court in Brooklyn Tuesday morning to enter the plea on the company’s behalf. | The chief executive of Lafarge appeared in federal court in Brooklyn Tuesday morning to enter the plea on the company’s behalf. |
| The company said in a statement that the conduct that set off the case has ended. | The company said in a statement that the conduct that set off the case has ended. |
| “None of the conduct involved Lafarge operations or employees in the United States and none of the executives who were involved in the conduct are with Lafarge or any affiliated entities today,” the company said, adding that it had “accepted responsibility for the actions of the individual executives involved, whose behavior was in flagrant violation of Lafarge’s Code of Conduct.” | “None of the conduct involved Lafarge operations or employees in the United States and none of the executives who were involved in the conduct are with Lafarge or any affiliated entities today,” the company said, adding that it had “accepted responsibility for the actions of the individual executives involved, whose behavior was in flagrant violation of Lafarge’s Code of Conduct.” |
| Lafarge, which was founded in the middle of the 19th century during the construction boom in Paris, frantically worked to keep its Syrian operations functioning even as Islamic State forces cut a swath of destruction through the region. | Lafarge, which was founded in the middle of the 19th century during the construction boom in Paris, frantically worked to keep its Syrian operations functioning even as Islamic State forces cut a swath of destruction through the region. |
| While other multinational companies pulled out, Lafarge made a calculated decision to stay, pushing the limits of international law to keep going. The company’s actions, reconstructed by The New York Times in 2018 from sealed French court filings, documented the efforts of executives to take a series of actions — trade-offs and payments — that left one of the world’s biggest construction materials firm vulnerable to criminal and legal jeopardy in the United States and France. | While other multinational companies pulled out, Lafarge made a calculated decision to stay, pushing the limits of international law to keep going. The company’s actions, reconstructed by The New York Times in 2018 from sealed French court filings, documented the efforts of executives to take a series of actions — trade-offs and payments — that left one of the world’s biggest construction materials firm vulnerable to criminal and legal jeopardy in the United States and France. |
| To move supplies and employees through dangerous areas, and to secure raw materials, Lafarge funneled money to intermediaries who negotiated with the Islamic State, as well as Al Qaeda’s affiliate in Syria and other armed factions, according to the documents, which include testimony to investigators by former Lafarge officials, testimony and witness accounts of former employees, company correspondence and a confidential internal review of Lafarge’s Syria operations by the global law firm Baker McKenzie. | To move supplies and employees through dangerous areas, and to secure raw materials, Lafarge funneled money to intermediaries who negotiated with the Islamic State, as well as Al Qaeda’s affiliate in Syria and other armed factions, according to the documents, which include testimony to investigators by former Lafarge officials, testimony and witness accounts of former employees, company correspondence and a confidential internal review of Lafarge’s Syria operations by the global law firm Baker McKenzie. |
| The only other penalty comparable to the Lafarge deal was the 2007 agreement between the Justice Department and Chiquita Brands International Inc., which admitted to paying off a violent, right-wing terrorist organization known as the United Self-Defense Forces of Colombia to keep its operations running. |