This article is from the source 'nytimes' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at https://www.nytimes.com/2022/10/13/world/europe/france-murder-raddad-marchal.html

The article has changed 2 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 0 Version 1
No New Trial in Murder Mystery That Gripped France, Court Rules No New Trial in Murder Mystery That Gripped France, Court Rules
(34 minutes later)
PARIS — A Moroccan-born man convicted three decades ago in the grisly killing of a wealthy widow on the French Riviera will not get a new trial, a top French court ruled on Thursday, the latest twist in one of France’s most enduring murder mysteries.PARIS — A Moroccan-born man convicted three decades ago in the grisly killing of a wealthy widow on the French Riviera will not get a new trial, a top French court ruled on Thursday, the latest twist in one of France’s most enduring murder mysteries.
Omar Raddad, had been found guilty of the 1991 murder of Ghislaine Marchal, 65, who lived by herself in a large villa north of Cannes. Police found her dead in the locked basement of an annex to the villa, where a message written in Ms. Marchal’s own blood seemed to accuse Mr. Raddad, her gardener at the time. Omar Raddad had been found guilty of the 1991 murder of Ghislaine Marchal, 65, who lived by herself in a large villa north of Cannes. Police found her dead in the locked basement of an annex to the villa, where a message written in Ms. Marchal’s own blood seemed to accuse Mr. Raddad, her gardener at the time.
Mr. Raddad, now 60, has always maintained his innocence. He was released from prison more than two decades ago, but sought a new trial to reverse his conviction and clear his name.Mr. Raddad, now 60, has always maintained his innocence. He was released from prison more than two decades ago, but sought a new trial to reverse his conviction and clear his name.
France was long captivated by the unresolved mysteries of the brutal murder and by the social undertones of the case, which involved two protagonists from starkly different backgrounds: a wealthy victim from a prominent family, and a working-class Arab immigrant who was unable to read or write and spoke little French.France was long captivated by the unresolved mysteries of the brutal murder and by the social undertones of the case, which involved two protagonists from starkly different backgrounds: a wealthy victim from a prominent family, and a working-class Arab immigrant who was unable to read or write and spoke little French.
The case proved particularly gripping because of a strange grammatical error in the message supposedly scrawled by Ms. Marchal, who was found with multiple bruises and cuts behind a barricaded door. While she appeared to have written “Omar killed me,” the sentence contained a glaring mistake — in the original French, “Omar m’a tuer,” instead of “m’a tuée,” using the infinitive rather than a form of past tense.The case proved particularly gripping because of a strange grammatical error in the message supposedly scrawled by Ms. Marchal, who was found with multiple bruises and cuts behind a barricaded door. While she appeared to have written “Omar killed me,” the sentence contained a glaring mistake — in the original French, “Omar m’a tuer,” instead of “m’a tuée,” using the infinitive rather than a form of past tense.
Mr. Raddad’s defenders argued that a woman of Ms. Marchal’s background would not have made such an error, even in her dying moments.Mr. Raddad’s defenders argued that a woman of Ms. Marchal’s background would not have made such an error, even in her dying moments.
His DNA and fingerprints were never found at the crime scene. Mr. Raddad’s supporters suggested that he was framed and easily convicted because of his background, and famous intellectuals took up his cause.His DNA and fingerprints were never found at the crime scene. Mr. Raddad’s supporters suggested that he was framed and easily convicted because of his background, and famous intellectuals took up his cause.
His lawyers succeeded in partially reopening the case last year and requested a retrial, after presenting new DNA evidence that they said exonerated him. Judges on France’s top appeals court ordered further analysis of the new evidence, in what Mr. Raddad’s supporters had hoped was the first step toward a new trial.His lawyers succeeded in partially reopening the case last year and requested a retrial, after presenting new DNA evidence that they said exonerated him. Judges on France’s top appeals court ordered further analysis of the new evidence, in what Mr. Raddad’s supporters had hoped was the first step toward a new trial.
But on Thursday, the court rejected the request.But on Thursday, the court rejected the request.
Sylvie Noachovitch, Mr. Raddad’s lawyer, told reporters at the courthouse in Paris that she was “absolutely scandalized” and said she would appeal before the European Court of Human Rights.Sylvie Noachovitch, Mr. Raddad’s lawyer, told reporters at the courthouse in Paris that she was “absolutely scandalized” and said she would appeal before the European Court of Human Rights.
“I will never abandon Omar Raddad,” Ms. Noachovitch said. “My determination is even stronger, stronger than ever.”“I will never abandon Omar Raddad,” Ms. Noachovitch said. “My determination is even stronger, stronger than ever.”
Retrials are rare in France, and retrials where convictions are overturned are even rarer. In 2002, a similar request by Mr. Raddad, based on new testimony and earlier DNA evidence, had already been rejected.Retrials are rare in France, and retrials where convictions are overturned are even rarer. In 2002, a similar request by Mr. Raddad, based on new testimony and earlier DNA evidence, had already been rejected.
Ms. Marchal’s family has always maintained that Mr. Raddad is guilty and had opposed a new trial. In a statement issued on Thursday by Sabine du Granrut, Ms. Marchal’s niece, the family said it hoped the decision would “put a definitive end to a case that it has painfully experienced.”Ms. Marchal’s family has always maintained that Mr. Raddad is guilty and had opposed a new trial. In a statement issued on Thursday by Sabine du Granrut, Ms. Marchal’s niece, the family said it hoped the decision would “put a definitive end to a case that it has painfully experienced.”
“The family regrets that for the past 30 years this affair has been the subject of media agitation,” the statement said.“The family regrets that for the past 30 years this affair has been the subject of media agitation,” the statement said.
At his trial, in 1994, prosecutors said that Mr. Raddad had a gambling problem and had killed his employer in a fit of rage when she refused to give him an advance on his wages. Mr. Raddad’s supporters argued that he got along well with Ms. Marchal and had no reason to kill her.At his trial, in 1994, prosecutors said that Mr. Raddad had a gambling problem and had killed his employer in a fit of rage when she refused to give him an advance on his wages. Mr. Raddad’s supporters argued that he got along well with Ms. Marchal and had no reason to kill her.
Mr. Raddad was convicted and sentenced to 18 years in prison, although he was freed after four years following a request from King Hassan II of Morocco, where the case was followed closely, and a partial pardon from France’s president at the time, Jacques Chirac.Mr. Raddad was convicted and sentenced to 18 years in prison, although he was freed after four years following a request from King Hassan II of Morocco, where the case was followed closely, and a partial pardon from France’s president at the time, Jacques Chirac.
In 2015, advances in DNA technology placed the DNA of four unidentified men — none of them Mr. Raddad — at the crime scene, including one whose genetic traces were mixed with the victim’s blood.In 2015, advances in DNA technology placed the DNA of four unidentified men — none of them Mr. Raddad — at the crime scene, including one whose genetic traces were mixed with the victim’s blood.
Mr. Raddad’s supporters said the new evidence would help identify the real murderer. Ms. Marchal’s family countered that evidence was handled with less care three decades ago and that the DNA traces were contamination from an unrelated source.Mr. Raddad’s supporters said the new evidence would help identify the real murderer. Ms. Marchal’s family countered that evidence was handled with less care three decades ago and that the DNA traces were contamination from an unrelated source.
In its ruling on Thursday, the court said that the discovery of new DNA at the scene did not constitute sufficient grounds to order a new trial. There was too much uncertainty about where it came from and it was impossible to establish when it had been left there, the court said.In its ruling on Thursday, the court said that the discovery of new DNA at the scene did not constitute sufficient grounds to order a new trial. There was too much uncertainty about where it came from and it was impossible to establish when it had been left there, the court said.
The newly discovered DNA “is not sufficient, in itself, to establish their connection with the case, as these traces may have been left before or after the murder,” the court wrote in its ruling.The newly discovered DNA “is not sufficient, in itself, to establish their connection with the case, as these traces may have been left before or after the murder,” the court wrote in its ruling.
Ms. Noachovitch, Mr. Raddad’s lawyer, disputed that reasoning, arguing that the judges had ignored a 2014 law that relaxed the criteria for retrials and that the new evidence, even if impossible to date, cast enough doubt on Mr. Raddad’s conviction to justify a new hearing.Ms. Noachovitch, Mr. Raddad’s lawyer, disputed that reasoning, arguing that the judges had ignored a 2014 law that relaxed the criteria for retrials and that the new evidence, even if impossible to date, cast enough doubt on Mr. Raddad’s conviction to justify a new hearing.