This article is from the source 'bbc' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-south-yorkshire-63244479

The article has changed 8 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 5 Version 6
Covid: Woman accused of Sheffield lockdown rave has case thrown out Covid: Woman accused of Sheffield lockdown rave has case thrown out
(about 2 months later)
Sunny-Jo Veasey was accused of having a rave-type gathering at her shared home in SheffieldSunny-Jo Veasey was accused of having a rave-type gathering at her shared home in Sheffield
A woman accused of hosting a rave during a coronavirus lockdown said court proceedings had been "a con" after the case against her was dropped.A woman accused of hosting a rave during a coronavirus lockdown said court proceedings had been "a con" after the case against her was dropped.
Sunny-Jo Veasey, 28, of Sheffield, was accused of hosting more than 30 people at her shared home in February 2021.Sunny-Jo Veasey, 28, of Sheffield, was accused of hosting more than 30 people at her shared home in February 2021.
She said the case was withdrawn due to a "defective charge", and was worried others were pressured into paying fines despite "inconsistent" legislation.She said the case was withdrawn due to a "defective charge", and was worried others were pressured into paying fines despite "inconsistent" legislation.
South Yorkshire Police, which brought the case, has been asked to comment.South Yorkshire Police, which brought the case, has been asked to comment.
Ms Veasey was alleged to have hosted a party in her shared home on Ecclesall Road on 28 February 2021, when the country was subject to restrictions.Ms Veasey was alleged to have hosted a party in her shared home on Ecclesall Road on 28 February 2021, when the country was subject to restrictions.
At the time, this meant you could only leave home for limited reasons permitted in law, such as to shop for essentials, to work if you could not work from home, or to exercise.At the time, this meant you could only leave home for limited reasons permitted in law, such as to shop for essentials, to work if you could not work from home, or to exercise.
Those found guilty could be fined £10,000 under the legislation.Those found guilty could be fined £10,000 under the legislation.
In March, Ms Veasey was found guilty of the charge in her absence after court documents were sent to her old address.In March, Ms Veasey was found guilty of the charge in her absence after court documents were sent to her old address.
Sheffield Magistrates' Court rescinded the verdict and adjourned the case to May, which was extended again until October.Sheffield Magistrates' Court rescinded the verdict and adjourned the case to May, which was extended again until October.
'Large waste of time''Large waste of time'
Ms Veasey, who represented herself, said video evidence showed 27 people in her home but maintained it was not a party.Ms Veasey, who represented herself, said video evidence showed 27 people in her home but maintained it was not a party.
She admitted she was in the wrong for inviting people from outside her household to the property, which she shared with seven other people.She admitted she was in the wrong for inviting people from outside her household to the property, which she shared with seven other people.
She added she would have paid a smaller fine but felt the £10,000 fine was unjust.She added she would have paid a smaller fine but felt the £10,000 fine was unjust.
"It seems like a bit of a con. They're trying to pull money out of people, pushing people through court cases," she said."It seems like a bit of a con. They're trying to pull money out of people, pushing people through court cases," she said.
"I think it's a large waste of time. I've had numerous court cases, and they probably spent more on these court cases out of the taxpayers' money than the fine would have been in the first place.""I think it's a large waste of time. I've had numerous court cases, and they probably spent more on these court cases out of the taxpayers' money than the fine would have been in the first place."
She felt people would be "scared" and pay the fines rather than try to fight them, she added.She felt people would be "scared" and pay the fines rather than try to fight them, she added.
Days of research using Google helped her prepare her case, but just two days before she was due in court the case was withdrawn.Days of research using Google helped her prepare her case, but just two days before she was due in court the case was withdrawn.
"I was so relieved. I was over the moon. I feel free, like I can finally put this behind me," she added."I was so relieved. I was over the moon. I feel free, like I can finally put this behind me," she added.
Sheffield Magistrates' Court confirmed the case had been withdrawn.Sheffield Magistrates' Court confirmed the case had been withdrawn.
Follow BBC Yorkshire on Facebook, Twitter and Instagram. Send your story ideas to yorkslincs.news@bbc.co.uk.Follow BBC Yorkshire on Facebook, Twitter and Instagram. Send your story ideas to yorkslincs.news@bbc.co.uk.
Related TopicsRelated Topics
Coronavirus lockdown measuresCoronavirus lockdown measures
SheffieldSheffield
Coronavirus pandemic