This article is from the source 'bbc' and was first published or seen on . It will not be checked again for changes.
You can find the current article at its original source at http://news.bbc.co.uk/go/rss/-/1/hi/uk/6297205.stm
The article has changed 3 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.
Version 0 | Version 1 |
---|---|
Quiz shows are gambling, say MPs | Quiz shows are gambling, say MPs |
(about 1 hour later) | |
Late-night quiz shows where viewers call premium rate telephone numbers to answer questions should be subject to gambling laws, a group of MPs has said. | Late-night quiz shows where viewers call premium rate telephone numbers to answer questions should be subject to gambling laws, a group of MPs has said. |
The culture, media and sport committee criticised the shows for being unfair and called for greater regulation. | The culture, media and sport committee criticised the shows for being unfair and called for greater regulation. |
They said viewers on such quiz channels were often egged-on to call even when they could not win any prizes. | They said viewers on such quiz channels were often egged-on to call even when they could not win any prizes. |
One, channel ITV Play, was recently rapped by media regulator Ofcom for making its answers too obscure. | One, channel ITV Play, was recently rapped by media regulator Ofcom for making its answers too obscure. |
Viewers complained after two answers to the question "what items might be found in a woman's handbag" were revealed to be balaclava and Rawlplugs. | |
'Lack of transparency' | 'Lack of transparency' |
The MPs said puzzles on all such programmes should get third-party approval before they are broadcast. | The MPs said puzzles on all such programmes should get third-party approval before they are broadcast. |
And they recommended that viewers should be given more information about the likelihood of getting through to the studio, and be told the cost of repeat calls. | And they recommended that viewers should be given more information about the likelihood of getting through to the studio, and be told the cost of repeat calls. |
It is a matter of luck whether a call is connected to the studio Culture, Media and Sport Committee | It is a matter of luck whether a call is connected to the studio Culture, Media and Sport Committee |
The MPs' report stated: "We believe that call-TV quiz shows generally look and feel like gambling. | The MPs' report stated: "We believe that call-TV quiz shows generally look and feel like gambling. |
"It seems to us that call-TV quiz shows should constitute gaming under the Gambling Act 2005, and the Department for Culture, Media and Sport and the Gambling Commission should consider this as a matter of urgency." | "It seems to us that call-TV quiz shows should constitute gaming under the Gambling Act 2005, and the Department for Culture, Media and Sport and the Gambling Commission should consider this as a matter of urgency." |
If the shows were classed as a lottery, they would be obliged to give 20% of their profits to good causes. | If the shows were classed as a lottery, they would be obliged to give 20% of their profits to good causes. |
The committee complained about "a lack of fairness and transparency", saying players were generally not told that "it is a matter of luck whether a call is connected to the studio and that the chances of getting through are very slim." | The committee complained about "a lack of fairness and transparency", saying players were generally not told that "it is a matter of luck whether a call is connected to the studio and that the chances of getting through are very slim." |
Committee chairman John Whittingdale said they had heard "some pretty disturbing evidence" of people being encouraged to call more times than they could afford. | Committee chairman John Whittingdale said they had heard "some pretty disturbing evidence" of people being encouraged to call more times than they could afford. |
The report cited one individual who received a bill for £348 for 15 calls to such channels, and a parent whose son and his babysitter ran up unauthorised bills of £700. | The report cited one individual who received a bill for £348 for 15 calls to such channels, and a parent whose son and his babysitter ran up unauthorised bills of £700. |