This article is from the source 'bbc' and was first published or seen on . It will not be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at http://news.bbc.co.uk/go/rss/-/1/hi/uk_politics/6292863.stm

The article has changed 10 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 4 Version 5
Quit Iraq by October - Lib Dems Blair rejects Iraq pull-out call
(30 minutes later)
British forces should begin a "staged withdrawal" from Iraq in May, with the last forces leaving by the end of October, the Liberal Democrats say. Tony Blair has dismissed a Liberal Democrat call for UK troops to leave Iraq by the end of October, saying it would send a "disastrous signal".
Leader Sir Menzies Campbell said ministers should now spend three months consulting coalition and regional allies over precise details. Lib Dem leader Sir Menzies Campbell said soldiers should start a five-month "staged withdrawal" in May.
He is the first main UK party leader to suggest a definite withdrawal date. But Mr Blair told the Commons such an "arbitrary timetable" was unworkable.
His call came as Tony Blair faced criticism for deciding not to lead a debate on Iraq on Wednesday. Sir Menzies also criticised the prime minister for deciding not to lead a debate on Iraq on Wednesday. But No 10 said this was normal practice.
Instead Mr Blair will be giving a speech on public services to a meeting of business leaders. 'Should debate'
Basra date Sir Menzies is the first main UK party leader to suggest a definite withdrawal date.
Sir Menzies, whose party is the third largest in the UK parliament and opposed the war in 2003, said: "I think we should spend the next three months discussing with regional allies and with coalition allies what we propose to do. Instead of attending the Iraq debate which follows prime minister's questions, Mr Blair will be giving a speech on public services to a meeting of business leaders.
HAVE YOUR SAY Pulling out is a complete betrayal of the Iraqi people David Shepherd, Withernsea Send us your comments
Sir Menzies, speaking at prime minister's questions, said: "If he feels so strongly, he should come to debate these issues."
There was "nothing more important", he added.
Mr Blair replied that he was debating the issue "now", adding that Iraq was in "circumstances of difficulty and danger".
He added: "They [UK troops] are there under a United Nations resolution, with the full support of the government of Iraq."
Pulling out now "would send the most disastrous signal to the people of Iraq", he said.
Basra handover
Earlier, Sir Menzies, whose party is the third largest in the UK parliament and opposed the war in 2003, said: "I think we should spend the next three months discussing with regional allies and with coalition allies what we propose to do.
"But between 1 May and the end of October we should conduct a staged withdrawal of United Kingdom forces."But between 1 May and the end of October we should conduct a staged withdrawal of United Kingdom forces.
He should now be in the House to reassure Parliament and the country that the government understands the gravity of situation William Hague, Conservatives
"In May the three provinces, according to the government, will be handed back to the Iraqis - Basra can be handed back sometime between May and July, we can hand over the transport route between Kuwait and Baghdad which we presently protect for the United States."In May the three provinces, according to the government, will be handed back to the Iraqis - Basra can be handed back sometime between May and July, we can hand over the transport route between Kuwait and Baghdad which we presently protect for the United States.
"We can withdraw the RAF aircraft that are operating out of Qatar and by October we should be able to bring all of our British forces back.""We can withdraw the RAF aircraft that are operating out of Qatar and by October we should be able to bring all of our British forces back."
The prime minister is due to address a CBI conference, but left-wing Labour MP John McDonnell said it was a "shocking negation of his responsibilities" to miss a Commons debate on Iraq. The prime minister is due to address a CBI conference, but left-wing Labour MP John McDonnell said it was a "shocking negation of his responsibilities" to miss the Commons debate on Iraq.
Sir Menzies has written asking Mr Blair to attend, while the Tories also said he should lead the debate. The prime minister's official spokesman said it was "not the practice" for Mr Blair to lead foreign affairs debates.
But the prime minister's official spokesman said it was "not the practice" for Mr Blair to lead foreign affairs debates. 'Clear strategy'
HAVE YOUR SAY Pulling out is a complete betrayal of the Iraqi people David Shepherd, Withernsea Send us your comments
He added: "He has made a commitment to the Commons to make a statement when Operation Sinbad is finished and assessed. That will be the appropriate point."He added: "He has made a commitment to the Commons to make a statement when Operation Sinbad is finished and assessed. That will be the appropriate point."
The spokesman also said: "Arbitrary timetables would say to those opposed to us 'Here is a target to aim at' with regard to raising their profile."
However, Sir Menzies said Mr Blair had a "public duty" to lead the debate. Foreign Secretary Margaret Beckett is expected to do so instead when the debate begins at about 1240 GMT.
'Entitled'
Sir Menzies said it was nearly four years since Mr Blair had last opened a debate on Iraq, since when 130 British servicemen and women had died and, according to UN estimates, 34,000 Iraqis had been killed in 2006 alone.Sir Menzies said it was nearly four years since Mr Blair had last opened a debate on Iraq, since when 130 British servicemen and women had died and, according to UN estimates, 34,000 Iraqis had been killed in 2006 alone.
"In these circumstances the British people are entitled to hear your analysis and strategy for withdrawal," he wrote. Ahead of the debate the shadow foreign secretary, William Hague, said: "He [Mr Blair] was in the House to lead us to war.
"I consider that on an issue of such gravity the public are entitled to hear the party leaders."
Shadow Foreign Secretary William Hague said: "He [Mr Blair] was in the House to lead us to war.
"He should now be in the House to reassure Parliament and the country that the government understands the gravity of situation in Iraq and has a clear strategy for making Iraq safe and stable.""He should now be in the House to reassure Parliament and the country that the government understands the gravity of situation in Iraq and has a clear strategy for making Iraq safe and stable."
The government agreed to allow the debate on Iraq and the wider Middle East under a technical procedure known as an adjournment debate. The government agreed to the debate on Iraq and the wider Middle East under a technical procedure known as an adjournment debate.
As no substantive motion will be put, MPs will not have a chance to vote for a change in policy.As no substantive motion will be put, MPs will not have a chance to vote for a change in policy.
Protest
However, opponents of the war may choose to make a symbolic protest at the end of the debate by voting against the Commons adjourning for the evening.However, opponents of the war may choose to make a symbolic protest at the end of the debate by voting against the Commons adjourning for the evening.
The Stop The War Coalition will stage a protest outside the Commons. In October, the government saw off a cross-party bid by MPs to force an immediate inquiry to be held into the Iraq war. But Mr Blair has said he has not ruled out holding one in the future.
In October, the government saw off a cross-party bid by MPs to force an immediate inquiry to be held into the Iraq war.
But Mr Blair has said he has not ruled out holding one in the future.
He has sidestepped growing calls for a full Commons debate on Iraq, saying he is happy to talk about it "at any time".