This article is from the source 'bbc' and was first published or seen on . It will not be checked again for changes.
You can find the current article at its original source at http://news.bbc.co.uk/go/rss/-/1/hi/uk_politics/8129075.stm
The article has changed 6 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.
Version 1 | Version 2 |
---|---|
Commons defeat over reform plan | |
(9 minutes later) | |
The government has been defeated by just three votes on part of its plans to "clean up" Parliament in the wake of the MPs expenses scandal. | |
MPs rejected by 250 votes to 247 a Parliamentary Standards Bill clause that could allow Parliamentary debates to be used in court as evidence. | MPs rejected by 250 votes to 247 a Parliamentary Standards Bill clause that could allow Parliamentary debates to be used in court as evidence. |
Senior Commons official Malcolm Jack had said it could have had a "chilling effect" on MPs' freedom of speech. | Senior Commons official Malcolm Jack had said it could have had a "chilling effect" on MPs' freedom of speech. |
Minister Jack Straw said the government would "respect" MPs' decision. | Minister Jack Straw said the government would "respect" MPs' decision. |
Earlier in the day, the cross-party justice committee had advised the clause be dropped and several MPs had raised concerns about it during Wednesday's debate. | Earlier in the day, the cross-party justice committee had advised the clause be dropped and several MPs had raised concerns about it during Wednesday's debate. |
The committee had heard evidence from senior Commons official Malcolm Jack warning of a potentially "chilling effect" of the clause on MPs' freedom of speech - and that of witnesses giving evidence to committees. | |
In its report it said withdrawing the clause "would allow more measured consideration of issues of privilege than has been possible" in the tight Parliamentary timetable. | |
The clause would allow Parliamentary proceedings to be used in court against an errant MP, breaking the long standing right to Parliamentary privilege. | |
Tory MP Gerald Howarth said the Commons vote had been a "serious affront" to the Justice Secretary Jack Straw. | |
The government wants the bill, which also sets up an independent body to run MPs' expenses, to be law by 21 July. | The government wants the bill, which also sets up an independent body to run MPs' expenses, to be law by 21 July. |
But several MPs had argued it was being rushed through in response to the expenses crisis - when it raises important constitutional matters about the freedom of MPs to speak freely in Parliament. | But several MPs had argued it was being rushed through in response to the expenses crisis - when it raises important constitutional matters about the freedom of MPs to speak freely in Parliament. |
One proposal, for a legally enforceable code of conduct for MPs, has already been dropped in the interests of "consensus", in an effort to get the bill through. | One proposal, for a legally enforceable code of conduct for MPs, has already been dropped in the interests of "consensus", in an effort to get the bill through. |
But the government won another vote to keep three planned criminal offences specifically for MPs who break the rules. |