This article is from the source 'bbc' and was first published or seen on . It will not be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at http://news.bbc.co.uk/go/rss/-/1/hi/uk_politics/8123195.stm

The article has changed 2 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 0 Version 1
Editor defends expenses coverage Editor defends expenses coverage
(about 3 hours later)
The editor of the Daily Telegraph has defended his coverage of MPs' expenses, saying suggestions it had irreparably damaged Parliament were "rubbish".The editor of the Daily Telegraph has defended his coverage of MPs' expenses, saying suggestions it had irreparably damaged Parliament were "rubbish".
Will Lewis told the BBC his paper's reports about MPs' claims would make Parliament more "open" and allow a "new generation" of people to be elected.Will Lewis told the BBC his paper's reports about MPs' claims would make Parliament more "open" and allow a "new generation" of people to be elected.
The coverage led to several MPs resigning and prompted major reforms.The coverage led to several MPs resigning and prompted major reforms.
But former Tory leader Michael Howard said some of the paper's coverage had been "inaccurate and unfair".But former Tory leader Michael Howard said some of the paper's coverage had been "inaccurate and unfair".
'Shock and awe''Shock and awe'
Mr Lewis told the BBC's political editor Nick Robinson that the expenses scandal of the past two months - triggered by the paper's publication of the unedited details of MPs' expenses since 2004 - had had an "undeniably good" effect.Mr Lewis told the BBC's political editor Nick Robinson that the expenses scandal of the past two months - triggered by the paper's publication of the unedited details of MPs' expenses since 2004 - had had an "undeniably good" effect.
Speaking publicly for the first time since the saga began, he said suggestions his paper's actions had undermined Parliament and democracy were "complete rubbish".Speaking publicly for the first time since the saga began, he said suggestions his paper's actions had undermined Parliament and democracy were "complete rubbish".
"It is going to open up Parliament to a whole new generation of people who understand what it means to be an elected representative of British citizens," he told a special Radio 4 programme on the expenses affair, 'Moats, Mortgages and Mayhem'."It is going to open up Parliament to a whole new generation of people who understand what it means to be an elected representative of British citizens," he told a special Radio 4 programme on the expenses affair, 'Moats, Mortgages and Mayhem'.
Why did we do this? Because they did not want us to see it Will Lewis, Daily Telegraph editor
Parliament had "lost its moral authority" some time ago, he said, illustrated by the long fight by some MPs to block the publication of their expenses details.Parliament had "lost its moral authority" some time ago, he said, illustrated by the long fight by some MPs to block the publication of their expenses details.
"This is not my fault. I am the messenger who happened to be able to get this stuff and deliver it to people who should have been told this by MPs themselves.""This is not my fault. I am the messenger who happened to be able to get this stuff and deliver it to people who should have been told this by MPs themselves."
Mr Lewis denied the coverage had been partisan, saying the paper had shone a light on the conduct of MPs from all parties with "the same vigour".Mr Lewis denied the coverage had been partisan, saying the paper had shone a light on the conduct of MPs from all parties with "the same vigour".
He said the extensive nature of the paper's disclosures was justified because of legitimate public interest in the story and the need to publish information quickly.He said the extensive nature of the paper's disclosures was justified because of legitimate public interest in the story and the need to publish information quickly.
"I knew we did have to go, in effect, for shock and awe," he explained."I knew we did have to go, in effect, for shock and awe," he explained.
"The principle we were establishing here was that I know this information was true and the readers must know this as quickly as possible because this has gone on for too long unnoticed.""The principle we were establishing here was that I know this information was true and the readers must know this as quickly as possible because this has gone on for too long unnoticed."
He added: "Why did we do this? Because they did not want us to see it."He added: "Why did we do this? Because they did not want us to see it."
'Tarred''Tarred'
Mr Howard acknowledged the paper had performed a public service by exposing "real abuses" of the system.Mr Howard acknowledged the paper had performed a public service by exposing "real abuses" of the system.
But he said the paper had failed, in many cases, to distinguish the unethical from the innocent and that most MPs had been "tarred with the same brush".But he said the paper had failed, in many cases, to distinguish the unethical from the innocent and that most MPs had been "tarred with the same brush".
"In doing so, I think they have in a number of cases been unfair, inaccurate and indeed, untruthful.""In doing so, I think they have in a number of cases been unfair, inaccurate and indeed, untruthful."
This was "bad for democracy and for the standing of MPs".This was "bad for democracy and for the standing of MPs".
Police are currently investigating the conduct of a small number of MPs and peers over their expenses.Police are currently investigating the conduct of a small number of MPs and peers over their expenses.
In response to the scandal, Gordon Brown has proposed new laws to transfer regulation of all expenses to an outside body as well as new offences for misconduct.In response to the scandal, Gordon Brown has proposed new laws to transfer regulation of all expenses to an outside body as well as new offences for misconduct.
The Telegraph Group continued its coverage of Parliamentary pay and expenses by publishing details of MPs' income from second jobs on Sunday.The Telegraph Group continued its coverage of Parliamentary pay and expenses by publishing details of MPs' income from second jobs on Sunday.