This article is from the source 'bbc' and was first published or seen on . It will not be checked again for changes.
You can find the current article at its original source at http://news.bbc.co.uk/go/rss/-/1/hi/england/london/8121104.stm
The article has changed 3 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.
Version 1 | Version 2 |
---|---|
Shop boss 'was not aggressive' | |
(30 minutes later) | |
A shop manager has denied "taunting" a worker who was told she could not work on the shop floor while wearing a cardigan to cover her prosthetic arm. | A shop manager has denied "taunting" a worker who was told she could not work on the shop floor while wearing a cardigan to cover her prosthetic arm. |
Riam Dean, 22, is suing Abercrombie & Fitch, saying she felt "diminished" when told to work in the stockroom for not fitting the firm's "look policy". | Riam Dean, 22, is suing Abercrombie & Fitch, saying she felt "diminished" when told to work in the stockroom for not fitting the firm's "look policy". |
Maria Barbera, then manager at the Savile Row store, denied her manner was "aggressive or intimidating". | Maria Barbera, then manager at the Savile Row store, denied her manner was "aggressive or intimidating". |
She said she told Miss Dean she could work in the shop wearing short sleeves. | She said she told Miss Dean she could work in the shop wearing short sleeves. |
Miss Dean, of Greenford, north-west London, is suing the clothing store over discrimination. | Miss Dean, of Greenford, north-west London, is suing the clothing store over discrimination. |
I was direct and straight to the point. I did not think my manner was aggressive or intimidating in any way Maria Barbera, ex-manager at Abercrombie & Fitch | I was direct and straight to the point. I did not think my manner was aggressive or intimidating in any way Maria Barbera, ex-manager at Abercrombie & Fitch |
The student at Queen Mary University of London, who was born with her left forearm missing, claims she had been "taunted" and "goaded" by Ms Barbera. | The student at Queen Mary University of London, who was born with her left forearm missing, claims she had been "taunted" and "goaded" by Ms Barbera. |
Speaking at the tribunal Ms Barbera said: "I was aware that she had a prosthetic arm, but did not know that she had been given approval to wear clothes not in accordance with the look policy. | |
"I explained that she could not work on the shop floor because of her cardigan and asked that she go and work in the stockroom. Riam did not seem upset." | |
She confronted Miss Dean when she heard the student had told a colleague she was "kicked off" the shop floor. | |
'Upset and annoyed' | 'Upset and annoyed' |
Ms Barbera said: "I was direct and straight to the point. I did not think my manner was aggressive or intimidating in any way. | Ms Barbera said: "I was direct and straight to the point. I did not think my manner was aggressive or intimidating in any way. |
"Riam told me she was upset because I did not give her the opportunity to take the cardigan off. | |
"I explained that I had wrongly assumed that she would not want to remove the cardigan." | "I explained that I had wrongly assumed that she would not want to remove the cardigan." |
The manager said when she told Miss Dean she could return to the shop floor, if she agreed to take off the cardigan, the student allegedly replied: "It's okay, I'm used to being the victim." | |
Ms Barbera said she was "upset and annoyed" by the incident but she did not make the link between the student's reluctance to take off her cardigan and her disability. | |
'Embellished events' | |
Ms Barbera is now a senior manager at the store's sister chain Hollister. | |
Abercrombie & Fitch lawyer Akash Nawbatt summed up by saying Ms Dean had exaggerated and embellished events. | |
He said her disability played no part in being removed from the shop floor and she was not dismissed because of it. | |
But Ms Dean's lawyer Harini Iyengar said discrimination did occur and Abercrombie & Fitch's approach meant it was "waiting to happen". | |
A judgement in the case is expected on 8 July. |