This article is from the source 'bbc' and was first published or seen on . It will not be checked again for changes.
You can find the current article at its original source at http://news.bbc.co.uk/go/rss/-/1/hi/sci/tech/8119678.stm
The article has changed 2 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.
Previous version
1
Next version
Version 0 | Version 1 |
---|---|
Science and tech committee reborn | Science and tech committee reborn |
(about 19 hours later) | |
The re-establishment of a parliamentary Science and Technology Committee was approved on Thursday. | The re-establishment of a parliamentary Science and Technology Committee was approved on Thursday. |
The committee will be made up of the same members as the existing Innovation, Universities, Skills, and Science Committee (IUSS). | The committee will be made up of the same members as the existing Innovation, Universities, Skills, and Science Committee (IUSS). |
Some MPs recently raised concerns that government science policy would be marginalised in the new Department for Business, Innovation and Skills (BIS). | Some MPs recently raised concerns that government science policy would be marginalised in the new Department for Business, Innovation and Skills (BIS). |
The committee will take over its new role when Parliament sits in October. | The committee will take over its new role when Parliament sits in October. |
Lord Drayson, Minister for Science and Innovation, said of the move: "Effective oversight of the use of science across government is important. I look forward to working with the Select Committee in supporting a dynamic science and research base." | |
Initial calls for a re-establishment of the Science and Technology Committee, which was abolished in 2007, came from a report by IUSS, suggesting that science "could be lost in a black hole" in what the committee chairman Phil Willis called the "all-encompassing super department" of BIS. | Initial calls for a re-establishment of the Science and Technology Committee, which was abolished in 2007, came from a report by IUSS, suggesting that science "could be lost in a black hole" in what the committee chairman Phil Willis called the "all-encompassing super department" of BIS. |
The Campaign for Science and Engineering (Case) welcomed the decision. Case director Nick Dusic said: "Today's decision showed that there is strong support for proper scrutiny of science and engineering within Parliament. | |
"[This] corrects the mistake made in 2007 of abolishing the Committee." | "[This] corrects the mistake made in 2007 of abolishing the Committee." |
Institute of Physics chief executive Robert Kirby-Harris said he was delighted that the identity of the "very effective" IUSS committee would be maintained in the new body. | Institute of Physics chief executive Robert Kirby-Harris said he was delighted that the identity of the "very effective" IUSS committee would be maintained in the new body. |
Previous version
1
Next version