This article is from the source 'bbc' and was first published or seen on . It will not be checked again for changes.
You can find the current article at its original source at http://news.bbc.co.uk/go/rss/-/1/hi/england/london/8103133.stm
The article has changed 2 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.
Previous version
1
Next version
Version 0 | Version 1 |
---|---|
Taxpayers 'could pay for runway' | |
(about 5 hours later) | |
Taxpayers could end up subsidising the £9bn bill for Heathrow's third runway because of the "precarious" finances of the airport's operator, an MP has said. | Taxpayers could end up subsidising the £9bn bill for Heathrow's third runway because of the "precarious" finances of the airport's operator, an MP has said. |
Hayes and Harlington MP John McDonnell was speaking amid reports on what would happen if BAA went into administration. | Hayes and Harlington MP John McDonnell was speaking amid reports on what would happen if BAA went into administration. |
But a BAA spokesman has reiterated that the cost of developing Heathrow "will be met by the private sector". | |
Transport Minister Paul Clark did not answer the BAA claims but insisted expansion was vital for the UK economy. | |
Former transport secretary Geoff Hoon approved the plans for a third runway in January. | Former transport secretary Geoff Hoon approved the plans for a third runway in January. |
The decision provoked an angry backlash from climate campaigners and residents but airlines, businesses, BAA and some unions welcomed the announcement. | |
The fact has not changed that having a transport system is the lifeblood of Britain's economy, indeed that Heathrow is our only hub airport Paul Clark, junior transport minister | The fact has not changed that having a transport system is the lifeblood of Britain's economy, indeed that Heathrow is our only hub airport Paul Clark, junior transport minister |
Speaking in a Westminster Hall debate in Parliament, Mr McDonnell, whose constituency includes Heathrow, highlighted a report in the Guardian newspaper which said BAA had urged ministers to revise plans that would give ministers powers over its airports if it went bust. | |
The Labour MP said this would mean the government footing much of the bill for the controversial expansion. | The Labour MP said this would mean the government footing much of the bill for the controversial expansion. |
He said: "We now believe there will be direct subsidy as a result of BAA's precarious financial position and the precarious financial position of Grupo Ferrovial globally (BAA's parent company) and that we will have to actually subsidise the development itself, the construction of the runway and the terminal." | He said: "We now believe there will be direct subsidy as a result of BAA's precarious financial position and the precarious financial position of Grupo Ferrovial globally (BAA's parent company) and that we will have to actually subsidise the development itself, the construction of the runway and the terminal." |
'Entirely disingenuous' | |
Responding to the MP's concerns, BAA said: "We have consistently said that the cost of developing Heathrow to the standard of every one of its European competitors will be met by the private sector, and that remains the case. | |
"In August 2008, BAA re-financed its debt, creating a stable, long-term platform from which to invest and it is entirely disingenuous of Mr McDonnell to make a connection between a draft government proposal on special administration for all regulated airports and the funding of a third runway at Heathrow." | |
Stressing the need for expansion, Mr Clark said: "The fact has not changed that having a transport system is the lifeblood of Britain's economy, indeed that Heathrow is our only hub airport." | |
A spokesman for the Department for Transport said: "At no time has the government ever suggested it will provide guarantees for the financing of a third runway or sixth terminal at Heathrow. | |
"The financing of developments at Heathrow is a matter for the operator (BAA) and the independent regulator, the CAA, and not government." | |
The 7,200ft (2.2km) runway is expected to be built sometime between 2015 and 2020. | The 7,200ft (2.2km) runway is expected to be built sometime between 2015 and 2020. |
Previous version
1
Next version