This article is from the source 'rtcom' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at https://www.rt.com/russia/551107-pentagon-ukraine-no-fly-zone/

The article has changed 3 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 0 Version 1
Pentagon chief weighs in on Ukraine no-fly zone Pentagon chief weighs in on Ukraine no-fly zone
(32 minutes later)
Any attempt to enforce a no-fly zone over Ukraine would likely mean war with Russia, the defense secretary saidAny attempt to enforce a no-fly zone over Ukraine would likely mean war with Russia, the defense secretary said
US Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin has rejected any plan to impose a no-fly zone over Ukraine following pleas from officials in Kiev, saying it would inevitably kick off hot conflict between nuclear powers. US Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin has rejected any plan to impose a no-fly zone over Ukraine following pleas from officials in Kiev, saying it would inevitably kick off a hot conflict between nuclear powers.
Speaking to NBC’s Lester Holt for an interview aired on Wednesday, the Pentagon head agreed that a no-fly zone (NFZ) is a “non-starter” – a statement in line with the president’s pledge that American troops would not directly intervene in the conflict.Speaking to NBC’s Lester Holt for an interview aired on Wednesday, the Pentagon head agreed that a no-fly zone (NFZ) is a “non-starter” – a statement in line with the president’s pledge that American troops would not directly intervene in the conflict.
“President Biden’s been clear that US troops won’t fight Russia in Ukraine, and if you establish a no-fly zone, certainly in order to enforce that no-fly zone, you’ll have to engage Russian aircraft. And again, that would put us at war with Russia,” Austin said.“President Biden’s been clear that US troops won’t fight Russia in Ukraine, and if you establish a no-fly zone, certainly in order to enforce that no-fly zone, you’ll have to engage Russian aircraft. And again, that would put us at war with Russia,” Austin said.
While Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky called on the United States and NATO to take control of “significant parts” of his country’s airspace on Monday in order to disrupt Russian air operations, Washington has been reluctant to act on the request. During a briefing earlier this week, White House press secretary Jen Psaki also noted the risks associated with enforcing an NFZ. While Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky called on the United States and NATO to take control of “significant parts” of his country’s airspace on Monday in order to disrupt Russian air operations, Washington has been reluctant to act on the request. During a briefing earlier this week, White House Press Secretary Jen Psaki also noted the risks associated with enforcing an NFZ.
“That is definitely escalating and would potentially put us in a place in a military conflict with Russia. That’s something the president doesn’t want to do,” she said.“That is definitely escalating and would potentially put us in a place in a military conflict with Russia. That’s something the president doesn’t want to do,” she said.
British Prime Minister Boris Johnson has echoed that stance, saying that to get “involved actively in conflict with Russia is a huge step which is not being contemplated by any member” of the NATO alliance, and that an NFZ is “simply not on the agenda.”British Prime Minister Boris Johnson has echoed that stance, saying that to get “involved actively in conflict with Russia is a huge step which is not being contemplated by any member” of the NATO alliance, and that an NFZ is “simply not on the agenda.”
Western states continue to ship in a flurry of arms to help Ukrainian forces repel Russia’s advance, including anti-aircraft Stinger missiles from the US and Germany – breaking with Berlin’s long-held policy to never send weapons into an active conflict zone – in addition to a litany of other anti-armor munitions and small arms from other European allies. Western states continue to ship in a flurry of arms to help Ukrainian forces repel Russia’s advance, including anti-aircraft Stinger missiles from the US and Germany – breaking with Berlin’s long-held policy to never send weapons into an active conflict zone – in addition to a litany of other anti-armor munitions and small arms from other European allies. 
Moscow announced a “special military operation” in Ukraine last week on behalf of the Russian-speaking population of the newly recognized Donetsk and Lugansk Republics, launching strikes on military sites in a number of major cities while mobilizing a land invasion. While Russia says it aims to “demilitarize” and “denazify” the Ukrainian government, Kiev maintains the assault was entirely “unprovoked” and that it had no plans to retake the breakaway regions by force.Moscow announced a “special military operation” in Ukraine last week on behalf of the Russian-speaking population of the newly recognized Donetsk and Lugansk Republics, launching strikes on military sites in a number of major cities while mobilizing a land invasion. While Russia says it aims to “demilitarize” and “denazify” the Ukrainian government, Kiev maintains the assault was entirely “unprovoked” and that it had no plans to retake the breakaway regions by force.