This article is from the source 'bbc' and was first published or seen on . It will not be checked again for changes.
You can find the current article at its original source at http://news.bbc.co.uk/go/rss/-/1/hi/health/8094829.stm
The article has changed 5 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.
Version 0 | Version 1 |
---|---|
Child car-seat warning to parents | Child car-seat warning to parents |
(about 2 hours later) | |
Most UK parents are too quick to switch their children to front-facing car seats, a team of doctors has argued. | |
They say mounting evidence suggests it is safer for children to use a rear-facing seat until the age of four and parents should be advised accordingly. | They say mounting evidence suggests it is safer for children to use a rear-facing seat until the age of four and parents should be advised accordingly. |
In the UK it is common practice to switch babies to a front-facing seat when they weigh 9kg (20lb) - around the age of eight months for an average boy. | In the UK it is common practice to switch babies to a front-facing seat when they weigh 9kg (20lb) - around the age of eight months for an average boy. |
The study, in the British Medical Journal, was backed by safety experts. | The study, in the British Medical Journal, was backed by safety experts. |
The evidence shows that it is safer for children to travel rearward-facing for as long as possible, although that does not mean forward-facing seats are dangerous Duncan Vernon, Royal Society for the Prevention of Accidents | |
Dr Elizabeth Watson and Dr Michael Monteiro cite evidence from Sweden, where using a rear-facing seat up to the age of four is common practice. | Dr Elizabeth Watson and Dr Michael Monteiro cite evidence from Sweden, where using a rear-facing seat up to the age of four is common practice. |
There, studies have shown that children who died in accidents restrained in a forward-facing booster seat could potentially have survived if they had been travelling in rear-facing seats. | There, studies have shown that children who died in accidents restrained in a forward-facing booster seat could potentially have survived if they had been travelling in rear-facing seats. |
Another study used the US National Highway Traffic Safety Administration database to examine crashes involving 870 children between 1998 and 2003. | Another study used the US National Highway Traffic Safety Administration database to examine crashes involving 870 children between 1998 and 2003. |
It concluded that rear-facing seats were more effective than forward-facing seats in protecting children aged 0-23 months for all crash types. | It concluded that rear-facing seats were more effective than forward-facing seats in protecting children aged 0-23 months for all crash types. |
Recent crash tests have also reported that rear-facing seats resulted in significantly lower neck and chest injury measures compared with forward-facing seats. | Recent crash tests have also reported that rear-facing seats resulted in significantly lower neck and chest injury measures compared with forward-facing seats. |
Crash forces | Crash forces |
Dr Watson and Dr Monteiro argue that, unlike forward-facing seats, rear-facing seats keep the head, neck and spine fully aligned, so that crash forces are distributed over all of these body areas, minimising the general impact. | Dr Watson and Dr Monteiro argue that, unlike forward-facing seats, rear-facing seats keep the head, neck and spine fully aligned, so that crash forces are distributed over all of these body areas, minimising the general impact. |
They suspect that many parents and healthcare providers may be unaware that it is safer to leave children in rear-facing seats for as long as possible - or that rear-facing seats for toddlers exist. | They suspect that many parents and healthcare providers may be unaware that it is safer to leave children in rear-facing seats for as long as possible - or that rear-facing seats for toddlers exist. |
They said healthcare professionals should advise that rear-facing seats are safer than forward-facing seats for children under four years. | They said healthcare professionals should advise that rear-facing seats are safer than forward-facing seats for children under four years. |
They also called on manufacturers and retailers to make rear-facing seats for older children more available. | They also called on manufacturers and retailers to make rear-facing seats for older children more available. |
And they criticised the current weight-range labelling of European seats, which they said might imply that forward-facing seats are as safe as rear-facing seats for children over 9kg. | And they criticised the current weight-range labelling of European seats, which they said might imply that forward-facing seats are as safe as rear-facing seats for children over 9kg. |
Duncan Vernon, of the Royal Society for the Prevention of Accidents, backed the findings. | Duncan Vernon, of the Royal Society for the Prevention of Accidents, backed the findings. |
He said: "The evidence shows that it is safer for children to travel rearward-facing for as long as possible, although that does not mean forward-facing seats are dangerous." | He said: "The evidence shows that it is safer for children to travel rearward-facing for as long as possible, although that does not mean forward-facing seats are dangerous." |
Mr Vernon said parents should not be tempted to switch to a forward-facing seat as soon as their child reached the minimum weight. | Mr Vernon said parents should not be tempted to switch to a forward-facing seat as soon as their child reached the minimum weight. |
He called for greater availability of rear-facing seats in shops, so an expert could provide advice on how to fit it. | He called for greater availability of rear-facing seats in shops, so an expert could provide advice on how to fit it. |
Relying on ordering a seat over the web ran the risk that it would not be fitted properly, and so put the child at risk, he added. | Relying on ordering a seat over the web ran the risk that it would not be fitted properly, and so put the child at risk, he added. |