This article is from the source 'bbc' and was first published or seen on . It will not be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at http://news.bbc.co.uk/go/rss/-/1/hi/world/americas/8068019.stm

The article has changed 11 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 6 Version 7
California backs gay marriage ban California backs gay marriage ban
(30 minutes later)
California's Supreme Court has upheld a ban on same-sex marriage - the latest twist in a long-running saga.California's Supreme Court has upheld a ban on same-sex marriage - the latest twist in a long-running saga.
The judges rejected a challenge from gay-rights activists to overturn the result of a 2008 referendum which restricted marriage to heterosexuals.The judges rejected a challenge from gay-rights activists to overturn the result of a 2008 referendum which restricted marriage to heterosexuals.
Prior to the vote, same-sex marriages were legal for six months, during which 18,000 couples were married.Prior to the vote, same-sex marriages were legal for six months, during which 18,000 couples were married.
The judges said their ruling was not retroactive - meaning those couples will remain legally married.The judges said their ruling was not retroactive - meaning those couples will remain legally married.
Gay-rights activists stood outside the San Francisco court shouting "shame on you" after the decision was made public. Changes 'too easy'
Tuesday's legal showdown was sparked by a 4 November vote in which Californians backed Proposition 8 - the proposal to restrict marriage to heterosexual couples - by 52.3% to 47.7%.Tuesday's legal showdown was sparked by a 4 November vote in which Californians backed Proposition 8 - the proposal to restrict marriage to heterosexual couples - by 52.3% to 47.7%.
PROPOSITION 8 Only marriage between a man and a woman is valid or recognised in California
The campaign over November's vote cost more than $80m (£51m) - the most expensive ballot measure on a social issue in US history.The campaign over November's vote cost more than $80m (£51m) - the most expensive ballot measure on a social issue in US history.
But activists challenged the ruling, saying the measure violated the civil rights of gay couples. Activists challenged the result of the referendum, saying the measure violated the civil rights of gay couples.
PROPOSITION 8 Only marriage between a man and a woman is valid or recognised in California
They argued that the ballot measure revised the state constitution's equal-protection clause so dramatically that it should have had legislature approval before being put to voters.They argued that the ballot measure revised the state constitution's equal-protection clause so dramatically that it should have had legislature approval before being put to voters.
National 'tug of war' But the seven-strong panel of judges rejected the appeal by a six-to-one majority.
"Proposition 8 changes the basic nature of our government from one in which the majority protects the rights of minorities," said Shannon Minter, lead counsel for those seeking to overturn the measure. In their ruling, the judges said the campaigners were arguing that it was "just too easy" to amend the state constitution through the ballot process.
"It is not a proper function of this court to curtail that process; we are constitutionally bound to uphold it," the ruling said.
'Victory for democracy'
Gay-rights activists stood outside the San Francisco court shouting "shame on you" after the decision was made public.
CALIFORNIA GAY MARRIAGE 2004 San Francisco begins issuing marriage licences to same-sex couples - a move annulled by Supreme Court months laterMay 2008 Supreme Court votes 4-3 to legalise same-sex marriage; introduced in JuneNovember 2008 Voters approve Proposition 8 limiting marriage to heterosexual couplesMarch 2009 Civil-rights lawyers argue before Supreme Court that referendum is anti-constitutionalMay 2009 Supreme Court rules Proposition 8 is constitutionalCALIFORNIA GAY MARRIAGE 2004 San Francisco begins issuing marriage licences to same-sex couples - a move annulled by Supreme Court months laterMay 2008 Supreme Court votes 4-3 to legalise same-sex marriage; introduced in JuneNovember 2008 Voters approve Proposition 8 limiting marriage to heterosexual couplesMarch 2009 Civil-rights lawyers argue before Supreme Court that referendum is anti-constitutionalMay 2009 Supreme Court rules Proposition 8 is constitutional
"It takes away the right to be treated with equal dignity and respect. A simple majority cannot be allowed to take any rights away from a historically protected minority," AFP news agency quoted her as saying. Some promised to continue their campaign.
But before giving their ruling, some judges indicated they would be extremely reluctant to overrule the will of the people as expressed in the vote. "It's not about whether we get to stay married. Our fight is far from over," said 62-year-old Jeannie Rizzo, who was one of the lead plaintiffs.
"I have about 20 years left on this earth, and I'm going to continue to fight for equality every day," she told the Associated Press.
But the court's decision was hailed as a "victory for democracy" by Brad Dacus of the Pacific Justice Institute, a conservative group that supported Proposition 8.
"[The ruling is] a victory for the civil rights of clergy, county clerks and Californians across the political spectrum who did not want to be forced by the government to approve of same-sex marriage," he said.
National 'tug of war'
Before giving their ruling, some judges indicated they would be extremely reluctant to overrule the will of the people as expressed in the vote.
Supporters of Proposition 8 were also out in force
The court should not "willy-nilly disregard the will of the people to change the state constitution as they have in the past", said Judge Joyce Kennard, according to AFP.The court should not "willy-nilly disregard the will of the people to change the state constitution as they have in the past", said Judge Joyce Kennard, according to AFP.
Same-sex marriage is currently legal in five states - Massachusetts, the first state to legalise it in 2004, Connecticut, Maine, Vermont and Iowa - but is subject to the continuing national tug of war over the issue.Same-sex marriage is currently legal in five states - Massachusetts, the first state to legalise it in 2004, Connecticut, Maine, Vermont and Iowa - but is subject to the continuing national tug of war over the issue.
Opponents who were expecting the decision in California to go their way indicated they might set their sights on seeing same-sex marriage overturned in Iowa. Analysts say opponents of gay marriage might now set their sights on seeing the law overturned in Iowa.
DIVISIVE ISSUE Same-sex marriage is legal in Massachusetts, Connecticut, Maine, Vermont and IowaIllegal in all other states
But supporters of same-sex marriage are likely to try to force another referendum in California.
Like several other states, California allows same-sex couples to enter "domestic partnerships", which afford many of the same rights as marriage.Like several other states, California allows same-sex couples to enter "domestic partnerships", which afford many of the same rights as marriage.
But activists say such partnerships are not equivalent to marriage.But activists say such partnerships are not equivalent to marriage.
Are you protesting in California? What do you think of the Supreme Court's ruling on same-sex marriage? Send us your comments using the form below.Are you protesting in California? What do you think of the Supreme Court's ruling on same-sex marriage? Send us your comments using the form below.
A selection of your comments may be published, displaying your name and location unless you state otherwise in the box below.A selection of your comments may be published, displaying your name and location unless you state otherwise in the box below.
Send your pictures to yourpics@bbc.co.uk, text them to +44 7725 100 100 or if you have a large file you can upload here.Send your pictures to yourpics@bbc.co.uk, text them to +44 7725 100 100 or if you have a large file you can upload here.
Read the terms and conditions Read the terms and conditions
At no time should you endanger yourself or others, take any unnecessary risks or infringe any laws.At no time should you endanger yourself or others, take any unnecessary risks or infringe any laws.
The BBC may edit your comments and not all emails will be published. Your comments may be published on any BBC media worldwide. Terms & ConditionsThe BBC may edit your comments and not all emails will be published. Your comments may be published on any BBC media worldwide. Terms & Conditions