This article is from the source 'rtcom' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.
You can find the current article at its original source at https://www.rt.com/usa/542049-biden-revives-remain-mexico/
The article has changed 2 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.
Previous version
1
Next version
Version 0 | Version 1 |
---|---|
Biden revives Trump-era policy | Biden revives Trump-era policy |
(about 7 hours later) | |
The Joe Biden administration is set to revive a Trump-era policy requiring US-bound migrants to await their immigration hearings in Mexico. The move has drawn pushback from rights groups, arguing that it could have been avoided. | The Joe Biden administration is set to revive a Trump-era policy requiring US-bound migrants to await their immigration hearings in Mexico. The move has drawn pushback from rights groups, arguing that it could have been avoided. |
Biden’s Department of Homeland Security (DHS) said Thursday that it is now “working in good faith to re-implement the Migrant Protection Protocols (MPP) program” – informally known as the ‘remain in Mexico’ rule – as was “required by a federal court order.” | Biden’s Department of Homeland Security (DHS) said Thursday that it is now “working in good faith to re-implement the Migrant Protection Protocols (MPP) program” – informally known as the ‘remain in Mexico’ rule – as was “required by a federal court order.” |
“Secretary of Homeland Security Alejandro N. Mayorkas has repeatedly stated that MPP has endemic flaws, imposed unjustifiable human costs… and failed to address the root causes of irregular migration,” the department said, though added it would nonetheless follow a Supreme Court ruling issued over the summer barring the administration from ending the MPP. | |
Once the program is “fully operational,” it will accept migrant applications across the southwest border with Mexico, while those who have already arrived in the US will be returned to Mexico through seven different ports. | Once the program is “fully operational,” it will accept migrant applications across the southwest border with Mexico, while those who have already arrived in the US will be returned to Mexico through seven different ports. |
While President Biden attempted to scrap the ‘remain in Mexico’ policy last June, the nation’s highest court ruled against the move soon after, arguing that he used an “arbitrary and capricious” process to end the program. Somewhat ironically, it cited a ruling set under the Donald Trump administration as precedent, which barred it from ending another border policy brought by Trump’s own predecessor, Barack Obama. | While President Biden attempted to scrap the ‘remain in Mexico’ policy last June, the nation’s highest court ruled against the move soon after, arguing that he used an “arbitrary and capricious” process to end the program. Somewhat ironically, it cited a ruling set under the Donald Trump administration as precedent, which barred it from ending another border policy brought by Trump’s own predecessor, Barack Obama. |
The Biden team has since vowed to challenge the Supreme Court ruling, but has failed to do so, finally throwing in the towel on Thursday after months of legal wrangling. | |
Echoing the DHS’ own characterization of the program, critics have denounced the MPP as inhumane, with Amnesty International and other rights groups issuing a harsh joint statement against the administration after it said it would go along with the court order after all. | Echoing the DHS’ own characterization of the program, critics have denounced the MPP as inhumane, with Amnesty International and other rights groups issuing a harsh joint statement against the administration after it said it would go along with the court order after all. |
“It is inexplicable and unconscionable that the administration has chosen to expand the populations subjected to the deadly program, despite not being under any obligation to do so,” the groups said. Amnesty also blasted the White House for its decision to expel thousands of Haitian migrants from the border area. | “It is inexplicable and unconscionable that the administration has chosen to expand the populations subjected to the deadly program, despite not being under any obligation to do so,” the groups said. Amnesty also blasted the White House for its decision to expel thousands of Haitian migrants from the border area. |
Previous version
1
Next version