This article is from the source 'bbc' and was first published or seen on . It will not be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at http://news.bbc.co.uk/go/rss/-/1/hi/england/london/8063025.stm

The article has changed 4 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 0 Version 1
Baby P's death 'was preventable' Baby P's death 'was preventable'
(about 2 hours later)
The death of Baby Peter "could and should have been prevented", a report into his care has said. The "horrifying" death of Baby Peter "could and should have been prevented", a report into his care has said.
A serious case review said agencies lacked "toughness and urgency" by not taking the 17-month-old into care.A serious case review said agencies lacked "toughness and urgency" by not taking the 17-month-old into care.
The government ordered the review and said the authorities should have stopped the situation "in its tracks at the first serious incident". The government-ordered review said the authorities should have stopped the situation "in its tracks at the first serious incident".
Baby Peter died in August 2007 after months of abuse despite being seen by the authorities at least 60 times.Baby Peter died in August 2007 after months of abuse despite being seen by the authorities at least 60 times.
The review had been commissioned by Children's Secretary Ed Balls after the child's death, because of concerns over the conclusions of the first review into the death. The review was commissioned by Children's Secretary Ed Balls after the child's death, because of concerns over the conclusions of the first review into the death.
'Catastrophic injuries''Catastrophic injuries'
The latest inquiry concluded Baby Peter "deserved better" from the people charged with protecting him.The latest inquiry concluded Baby Peter "deserved better" from the people charged with protecting him.
Even after the boy was put under a child protection plan, his case was regarded as routine, "with injuries expected as a matter of course".Even after the boy was put under a child protection plan, his case was regarded as routine, "with injuries expected as a matter of course".
Agencies were "lacking urgency", "lacking thoroughness" and "insufficiently challenging to the parent", it said.Agencies were "lacking urgency", "lacking thoroughness" and "insufficiently challenging to the parent", it said.
The review, carried out by Haringey Local Safeguarding Children Board, found that agencies "did not exercise a strong enough sense of challenge" when dealing with Baby Peter's mother.The review, carried out by Haringey Local Safeguarding Children Board, found that agencies "did not exercise a strong enough sense of challenge" when dealing with Baby Peter's mother.
It also said their outlook was "completely inadequate" to meet the challenges of the case.It also said their outlook was "completely inadequate" to meet the challenges of the case.
It's a dreadful tragedy that he did not receive better protection Graham Badman chairman of Haringey Local Safeguarding Children Board Baby P mother jailed indefinitely
Agencies would only have been willing to move him if the injuries he suffered were found to be "non-accidental beyond all reasonable doubt", the review revealed.Agencies would only have been willing to move him if the injuries he suffered were found to be "non-accidental beyond all reasonable doubt", the review revealed.
"When such injuries did come they were catastrophic, and he died of them," its report said."When such injuries did come they were catastrophic, and he died of them," its report said.
"The panel deeply regrets the responses of the services were not sufficiently effective in protecting him.""The panel deeply regrets the responses of the services were not sufficiently effective in protecting him."
Graham Badman, the chairman of Haringey Local Safeguarding Children Board, said every member of staff in the agencies involved with the case was "appropriately qualified, well-motivated and wanted to do their best to safeguard him".
"But his horrifying death could and should have been prevented," he added.
"The serious case review says that if doctors, lawyers, police officers and social workers had adopted a more urgent, thorough and challenging approach, the case would have been stopped in its tracks at the first serious incident.
"It's a dreadful tragedy that he did not receive better protection."