This article is from the source 'bbc' and was first published or seen on . It will not be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at http://news.bbc.co.uk/go/rss/-/1/hi/uk/8056534.stm

The article has changed 21 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 7 Version 8
MI5 'too stretched' before 7 July MI5 'too stretched' before 7 July
(21 minutes later)
The security service did not have the manpower to do extra checks on the 7 July ringleader before he carried out the attacks in 2005, a report has said.The security service did not have the manpower to do extra checks on the 7 July ringleader before he carried out the attacks in 2005, a report has said.
But the Intelligence and Security Committee declined to criticise MI5, which it said had other priorities.But the Intelligence and Security Committee declined to criticise MI5, which it said had other priorities.
It stressed that while officers knew of Mohammad Sidique Khan's terrorist links, there was no evidence to suggest he was a threat to national security.It stressed that while officers knew of Mohammad Sidique Khan's terrorist links, there was no evidence to suggest he was a threat to national security.
Fifty-two people were killed in the suicide bombings in London in 2005.Fifty-two people were killed in the suicide bombings in London in 2005.
The long-awaited report describes in unprecedented detail what officers knew of Khan before the attacks. The long-awaited report by a group of MPs describes in unprecedented detail what officers knew of Khan before the attacks.
It reveals that a police surveillance team photographed him in 2001 as part of an operation against suspected extremists. It reveals that a police surveillance team filmed him in 2001 as part of an operation against suspected extremists.
However, he was not identified from the picture - and his significance was only realised after the bombings.However, he was not identified from the picture - and his significance was only realised after the bombings.
'Astounding'
The report reveals that MI5 teams were stretched almost to breaking point in 2004 - the year before the attacks - attempting to trace terror suspects around the UK.
During that year, MI5 did not have the resources to watch 52 suspects who were classed as "essential targets".
Dominic Casciani,Home affairs correspondentDominic Casciani,Home affairs correspondent
This very detailed report lifts the lid on the security services in a way we've not seen before.This very detailed report lifts the lid on the security services in a way we've not seen before.
It clears MI5 of failing to anticipate the 7/7 attacks because it had so much on its plate in 2004. Quite simply, Mohammad Siddique Khan was not listed as an essential target.It clears MI5 of failing to anticipate the 7/7 attacks because it had so much on its plate in 2004. Quite simply, Mohammad Siddique Khan was not listed as an essential target.
Why? Because he had not been identified.Why? Because he had not been identified.
That's not to say the security service and police didn't know anything about him. We've now learned that police filmed him in 2001 when he went camping with known extremists.That's not to say the security service and police didn't know anything about him. We've now learned that police filmed him in 2001 when he went camping with known extremists.
But by 2004 MI5 still didn't know "what" Khan was: they knew he was hanging around with terror suspects - but insist there was no intelligence that he was a security threat.But by 2004 MI5 still didn't know "what" Khan was: they knew he was hanging around with terror suspects - but insist there was no intelligence that he was a security threat.
It's this critical difference between "who" and "what" that the security service relies upon amid accusations that it had seen enough dots - but failed to join them up.It's this critical difference between "who" and "what" that the security service relies upon amid accusations that it had seen enough dots - but failed to join them up.
'Astounding'
The report reveals that MI5 teams were stretched almost to breaking point in 2004 - the year before the attacks - attempting to trace terror suspects around the UK.
During that year, MI5 did not have the resources to watch 52 suspects who were classed as "essential targets".
In fact, the security service could only provide "reasonable" surveillance coverage of about one in 20 terror suspects - a fact the committee described as "astounding".In fact, the security service could only provide "reasonable" surveillance coverage of about one in 20 terror suspects - a fact the committee described as "astounding".
Resources were so stretched that officers could not even assess whether "desirable" targets should be examined more closely unless they were known to be actively plotting an attack. The committee said Khan and fellow 7/7 bomber Shehzad Tanweer were defined as "desirable" targets by MI5 after they were overheard discussing fraud and travel to Pakistan.
But resources were so stretched that officers could not even assess whether such "desirable" targets should be examined more closely unless they were known to be actively plotting an attack.
The report concluded that there would "always be gaps in intelligence coverage" and the country must be "realistic" about what the security services could achieve.
"Despite the increased efforts of the agencies, and the increased resources at their disposal, the odds are stacked against them," it said.
"It is an uncomfortable truth that, at some time in the future, and without any prior warning, it is very possible the UK will be the subject of another terrorist attack."
Fertiliser bomb plot
MI5 currently employs 3,500 officers. The committee said it would need an unachievable "several hundred thousand" to provide comprehensive intelligence coverage.MI5 currently employs 3,500 officers. The committee said it would need an unachievable "several hundred thousand" to provide comprehensive intelligence coverage.
In that context, it said the decision not to follow Khan after he had initially appeared on radar was understandable, taking into account operational pressures.In that context, it said the decision not to follow Khan after he had initially appeared on radar was understandable, taking into account operational pressures.
But the MPs said that given the amount of information held on Khan, it was "surprising" that they did not identify him prior to 7 July.But the MPs said that given the amount of information held on Khan, it was "surprising" that they did not identify him prior to 7 July.
There were six contacts recorded by MI5 and police with Khan between 1993, when he was arrested for assault, and January 2005, when a hire car was linked to a terror investigation.
Surveillance teams also witnessed several meetings between Khan and Tanweer and Omar Khyam, the man later discovered to be the leader of a plot to detonate fertiliser bombs.
Analysts decided the three men were not planning an attack and were instead involved in financial fraud.
The report also pointed out the overwhelming number of leads relating to Khyam - more than 4,000 telephone contacts and 1,154 links to vehicles - that MI5 were faced with.


Were you affected by the July 7th bombings in London? What is your reaction to the report? Send us your comments and experiences using the form below.Were you affected by the July 7th bombings in London? What is your reaction to the report? Send us your comments and experiences using the form below.
The BBC may edit your comments and not all emails will be published. Your comments may be published on any BBC media worldwide. Terms & ConditionsThe BBC may edit your comments and not all emails will be published. Your comments may be published on any BBC media worldwide. Terms & Conditions