This article is from the source 'bbc' and was first published or seen on . It will not be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at http://news.bbc.co.uk/go/rss/-/1/hi/uk/8056534.stm

The article has changed 21 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 16 Version 17
MI5 'too stretched' before 7 July MI5 'too stretched' before 7 July
(30 minutes later)
The security service MI5 did not have the manpower to do extra checks on the 7 July ringleader before he carried out the attacks in 2005, a report has said.The security service MI5 did not have the manpower to do extra checks on the 7 July ringleader before he carried out the attacks in 2005, a report has said.
But the Intelligence and Security Committee declined to criticise MI5, which it said had other priorities.But the Intelligence and Security Committee declined to criticise MI5, which it said had other priorities.
It stressed that while officers knew of Mohammad Sidique Khan's terrorist links, there was no evidence to suggest he was a threat to national security.It stressed that while officers knew of Mohammad Sidique Khan's terrorist links, there was no evidence to suggest he was a threat to national security.
Gordon Brown said he agreed there was no evidence that warnings were ignored. But 7/7 survivors rejected the findings and demanded a public inquiry.
The prime minister said he agreed with the committee's findings and that the decisions made by MI5 ahead of the bombings were "understandable and reasonable". Rachel North, who was injured in the Russell Square blast, said survivors and victims' families were now considering seeking a judicial review to try to force the government to allow an independent investigation into what happened.
"Analytical judgments and decisions have to be made on the basis of the information available at that time, and the prudence of those decisions can only properly be assessed in that context," he said. "This report does not come to any real conclusions at all," she told the BBC.
But the Conservatives repeated their call for a judicial inquiry into MI5's actions. "Why was it that one man was investigated, but another, Sidique Khan, was not? Even though they were hanging around with the same people, raising money for the same extremist causes?
Fifty-two people were killed in the suicide bombings in London in 2005.
'Essential targets'
Dominic Casciani,Home affairs correspondentDominic Casciani,Home affairs correspondent
This very detailed report clears MI5 of failing to anticipate the 7/7 attacks because it had so much on its plate in 2004.This very detailed report clears MI5 of failing to anticipate the 7/7 attacks because it had so much on its plate in 2004.
Quite simply, Mohammad Siddique Khan was not listed as an essential target. Why? Because he had not been identified.Quite simply, Mohammad Siddique Khan was not listed as an essential target. Why? Because he had not been identified.
That's not to say the security service and police were completely ignorant. Police filmed him in 2001 when he went camping with known extremists. They didn't know his name. Later, MI5 had information about an "S Khan" - but did not pursue it because he was not classed as a threat.That's not to say the security service and police were completely ignorant. Police filmed him in 2001 when he went camping with known extremists. They didn't know his name. Later, MI5 had information about an "S Khan" - but did not pursue it because he was not classed as a threat.
For MI5, knowing what someone is up to is more important than exactly who they are.For MI5, knowing what someone is up to is more important than exactly who they are.
They say they never knew what Khan was up to - and what he would turn out to be. It's this critical difference between the importance of who and what that the security service relies upon amid accusations that it failed to join the dots.They say they never knew what Khan was up to - and what he would turn out to be. It's this critical difference between the importance of who and what that the security service relies upon amid accusations that it failed to join the dots.
"Mohammad Sidique Khan was on the ladder in 2004 - are they telling us that someone is only of interest when they reach the top rung?"
Fifty-two people were killed in the suicide bombings in London in 2005.
'Essential targets'
The long-awaited report by a group of MPs describes in unprecedented detail what officers knew of Khan before the attacks.The long-awaited report by a group of MPs describes in unprecedented detail what officers knew of Khan before the attacks.
It reveals that a police surveillance team filmed him in 2001 as part of an operation against suspected extremists.It reveals that a police surveillance team filmed him in 2001 as part of an operation against suspected extremists.
However, he was not identified from the picture - and his significance was only realised after the bombings.However, he was not identified from the picture - and his significance was only realised after the bombings.
The report reveals that MI5 teams were stretched almost to breaking point in 2004 - the year before the attacks - attempting to trace terror suspects around the UK.The report reveals that MI5 teams were stretched almost to breaking point in 2004 - the year before the attacks - attempting to trace terror suspects around the UK.
During that year, MI5 did not have the resources to watch 52 suspects who were classed as "essential targets".During that year, MI5 did not have the resources to watch 52 suspects who were classed as "essential targets".
In fact, the security service could only provide "reasonable" surveillance coverage of about one in 20 terror suspects - a fact the committee described as "astounding".In fact, the security service could only provide "reasonable" surveillance coverage of about one in 20 terror suspects - a fact the committee described as "astounding".
The committee said Khan and fellow 7/7 bomber Shehzad Tanweer were defined as "desirable" targets by MI5 after they were overheard discussing fraud and travel to Pakistan.The committee said Khan and fellow 7/7 bomber Shehzad Tanweer were defined as "desirable" targets by MI5 after they were overheard discussing fraud and travel to Pakistan.
They want us to shut up and go away, but we are not going to Jacqui Putnam, 7/7 survivor Report reveals MI5's workings Q and A: The ISC's report
But resources were so stretched that officers could not even assess whether such "desirable" targets should be examined more closely unless they were known to be actively plotting an attack.But resources were so stretched that officers could not even assess whether such "desirable" targets should be examined more closely unless they were known to be actively plotting an attack.
The committee's chairman, Kim Howells MP, said: "Hindsight is a wonderful thing. Those judgements were made at the time and, having gone in detail through all of the details, we cannot find any reason to criticise the actions that were taken at the time."The committee's chairman, Kim Howells MP, said: "Hindsight is a wonderful thing. Those judgements were made at the time and, having gone in detail through all of the details, we cannot find any reason to criticise the actions that were taken at the time."
He said he hoped the report would put a stop to "speculation" and "conspiracy theories" which had caused distress to the families of the 7/7 victims.
'Errors made'
The MPs concluded that given the intelligence and resources available at the time, the attacks could not have been prevented.The MPs concluded that given the intelligence and resources available at the time, the attacks could not have been prevented.
But Mr Howells said his committee did have some criticisms of the police and MI5, in particular the fact that communication between the two appeared to have been done only on a "need to know" basis. And they said they hoped the report would put a stop to "speculation" and "conspiracy theories" which had caused distress to the families of the 7/7 victims.
There were errors which, if avoided, would have led to a prevention of this attack David DavisFormer shadow home secretary 'Reasonable'
Mr Howells said his committee did have some criticisms of the police and MI5, in particular the fact that communication between the two appeared to have been done only on a "need to know" basis.
There should have been a "more complete dialogue", he said, but added that the situation had improved "immeasurably" since the 7 July attacks.There should have been a "more complete dialogue", he said, but added that the situation had improved "immeasurably" since the 7 July attacks.
The prime minister also insisted that lessons had been learnt and there had "a significant increase" in the resources of the police and MI5. Gordon Brown said he agreed there was no evidence that warnings were ignored.
But despite this assurance, former shadow home secretary David Davis said there was a clear need for a senior judge to lead an investigation into the intelligence surrounding Khan. The prime minister said he accepted the committee's findings and felt that the decisions made by MI5 ahead of the bombings were "understandable and reasonable".
"We are not setting out to scapegoat or indeed attack members of the police or security agencies involved," he said. "Analytical judgments and decisions have to be made on the basis of the information available at that time, and the prudence of those decisions can only properly be assessed in that context," he said.
"But that's not the same as recognising that there were errors which, if avoided, would have led to a prevention of this attack." There were errors which, if avoided, would have led to a prevention of this attack David DavisFormer shadow home secretary
But the Conservatives and Liberal Democrats repeated their call for a judicial inquiry into MI5's actions.
Former shadow home secretary David Davis said he was not "setting out to scapegoat or attack" the policy or security service.
"But that's not the same as recognising that there were errors which, if avoided, would have led to a prevention of this attack," he said.
Jacqui Putnam, who also survived the bombings, said the committee had not "really looked at what went wrong".
"They are very charming about it, they are very accommodating when we ask to see them, but behind that, they want us to shut up and go away and stop making waves, but we are not going to," she said.
Fertiliser bomb plot
MI5 currently employs 3,500 officers. The committee said it would need an unachievable "several hundred thousand" to provide comprehensive intelligence coverage.MI5 currently employs 3,500 officers. The committee said it would need an unachievable "several hundred thousand" to provide comprehensive intelligence coverage.
In that context, it said the decision not to follow Khan after he had initially appeared on radar was understandable, taking into account operational pressures.In that context, it said the decision not to follow Khan after he had initially appeared on radar was understandable, taking into account operational pressures.
But the MPs said that given the amount of information held on Khan, it was "surprising" that they did not identify definitively him prior to 7 July.But the MPs said that given the amount of information held on Khan, it was "surprising" that they did not identify definitively him prior to 7 July.
Fertiliser bomb plot
There were six contacts recorded by MI5 and police with Khan between 1993, when he was arrested for assault, and January 2005, when a hire car was linked to a terror investigation.There were six contacts recorded by MI5 and police with Khan between 1993, when he was arrested for assault, and January 2005, when a hire car was linked to a terror investigation.
Surveillance teams also witnessed several meetings between Khan and Tanweer and Omar Khyam, the man later discovered to be the leader of a plot to detonate fertiliser bombs.Surveillance teams also witnessed several meetings between Khan and Tanweer and Omar Khyam, the man later discovered to be the leader of a plot to detonate fertiliser bombs.
Analysts decided the three men were not planning an attack and were instead involved in financial fraud.Analysts decided the three men were not planning an attack and were instead involved in financial fraud.
Despite the increased efforts of the agencies, the odds are stacked against them Intelligence and Security Committee class="" href="/1/hi/uk/8057620.stm">Report reveals MI5's workings class="" href="/1/hi/uk/8057886.stm">Q and A: The ISC's report Despite the increased efforts of the agencies, the odds are stacked against them Intelligence and Security Committee
The report also pointed out the overwhelming number of leads relating to Khyam - more than 4,000 telephone contacts and 1,154 links to vehicles - that MI5 were faced with.The report also pointed out the overwhelming number of leads relating to Khyam - more than 4,000 telephone contacts and 1,154 links to vehicles - that MI5 were faced with.
The report concluded that there would "always be gaps in intelligence coverage" and the country must be "realistic" about what the security services could achieve.The report concluded that there would "always be gaps in intelligence coverage" and the country must be "realistic" about what the security services could achieve.
"Despite the increased efforts of the agencies, and the increased resources at their disposal, the odds are stacked against them," it said."Despite the increased efforts of the agencies, and the increased resources at their disposal, the odds are stacked against them," it said.
"It is an uncomfortable truth that, at some time in the future, and without any prior warning, it is very possible the UK will be the subject of another terrorist attack.""It is an uncomfortable truth that, at some time in the future, and without any prior warning, it is very possible the UK will be the subject of another terrorist attack."
The committee also revealed that MI5 and MI6 told MPs there may have been a fifth person - "a facilitator" - involved in the 7 July bombings.The committee also revealed that MI5 and MI6 told MPs there may have been a fifth person - "a facilitator" - involved in the 7 July bombings.
Many of the passages in the report related to such an individual were censored, but the committee insisted there was no actual evidence against anyone that could form the basis of a prosecution.Many of the passages in the report related to such an individual were censored, but the committee insisted there was no actual evidence against anyone that could form the basis of a prosecution.


Were you affected by the July 7th bombings in London? What is your reaction to the report? Send us your comments and experiences using the form below.Were you affected by the July 7th bombings in London? What is your reaction to the report? Send us your comments and experiences using the form below.
The BBC may edit your comments and not all emails will be published. Your comments may be published on any BBC media worldwide. Terms & ConditionsThe BBC may edit your comments and not all emails will be published. Your comments may be published on any BBC media worldwide. Terms & Conditions