This article is from the source 'bbc' and was first published or seen on . It will not be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at http://news.bbc.co.uk/go/rss/-/1/hi/uk_politics/8039108.stm

The article has changed 22 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 5 Version 6
Cabinet expense claims published Cabinet expense claims published
(10 minutes later)
Gordon Brown claimed £6,000 after paying his brother for a cleaner at his Westminster flat, it is reported.Gordon Brown claimed £6,000 after paying his brother for a cleaner at his Westminster flat, it is reported.
It is among details of expenses claims made by Cabinet ministers, published by the Daily Telegraph.It is among details of expenses claims made by Cabinet ministers, published by the Daily Telegraph.
The paper also says Jack Straw claimed the full council tax on his second home despite having a 50% discount on it.The paper also says Jack Straw claimed the full council tax on his second home despite having a 50% discount on it.
No 10 said Mr Brown's claim was within the rules. Deputy Labour leader Harriet Harman said all claims by cabinet members were made in "good faith".No 10 said Mr Brown's claim was within the rules. Deputy Labour leader Harriet Harman said all claims by cabinet members were made in "good faith".
But the BBC's Political Editor Nick Robinson said the claims were an embarrassment for the Cabinet and Parliament and showed how lax the system of allowances had become. The BBC's Political Editor Nick Robinson said the claims were an embarrassment for the Cabinet and Parliament, but were unlikely to force anyone from office.
They did, however, show how lax the system of allowances had become, he added.
Claimed twiceClaimed twice
The Telegraph reports that Gordon Brown's brother, Andrew, received £6,577 between 2004 and 2006 for cleaning services at the prime minister's private flat.The Telegraph reports that Gordon Brown's brother, Andrew, received £6,577 between 2004 and 2006 for cleaning services at the prime minister's private flat.
No 10 told the paper that the PM shared a cleaner with his brother - an executive at EDF Energy - and "reimbursed him for the share of the cost".No 10 told the paper that the PM shared a cleaner with his brother - an executive at EDF Energy - and "reimbursed him for the share of the cost".
Hazel is honest as the day is long Hazel Blears' spokesman Expense claims - key details it is disgraceful that a national newspaper should stoop so low as to buy information Sir Stuart Bell MP Expense claims - key details
Downing Street sources said there was formal and longstanding contract for the cleaner stipulating hours of work and payment.Downing Street sources said there was formal and longstanding contract for the cleaner stipulating hours of work and payment.
The paper also says Gordon Brown claimed for the same £153 bill twice for plumbing work at his constituency home in successive quarters.The paper also says Gordon Brown claimed for the same £153 bill twice for plumbing work at his constituency home in successive quarters.
However, No 10 said the Parliamentary Fees Office accepted this was done inadvertently and had written to Mr Brown to apologise for not spotting the mistake.However, No 10 said the Parliamentary Fees Office accepted this was done inadvertently and had written to Mr Brown to apologise for not spotting the mistake.
It is also revealed that Mr Straw claimed his entire council tax bill for his second home despite already enjoying a substantial discount on the bill from his local authority, worth a reported £1,500 a year.It is also revealed that Mr Straw claimed his entire council tax bill for his second home despite already enjoying a substantial discount on the bill from his local authority, worth a reported £1,500 a year.
A spokesman for Mr Straw said all his claims had been made in accordance with Commons rules.A spokesman for Mr Straw said all his claims had been made in accordance with Commons rules.
He said while there had been errors in the council tax claim, the mistakes were spotted by Mr Straw himself and the money was repaid.He said while there had been errors in the council tax claim, the mistakes were spotted by Mr Straw himself and the money was repaid.
'Under-claimed''Under-claimed'
Among other reported revelations is that Communities Secretary Hazel Blears claimed for expenditure on three different properties during the same year, spending £5,000 on furniture in three months.Among other reported revelations is that Communities Secretary Hazel Blears claimed for expenditure on three different properties during the same year, spending £5,000 on furniture in three months.
A spokesman for Ms Blears said she had done nothing wrong and the furnishings she had bought were "reasonable".A spokesman for Ms Blears said she had done nothing wrong and the furnishings she had bought were "reasonable".
"Hazel is honest as the day is long," said the spokesman."Hazel is honest as the day is long," said the spokesman.
Culture Secretary Andy Burnham reportedly bought the freehold on a flat he already owned and claimed back the stamp duty and other moving costs.Culture Secretary Andy Burnham reportedly bought the freehold on a flat he already owned and claimed back the stamp duty and other moving costs.
Jack Straw is under scrutiny for his council tax claimsJack Straw is under scrutiny for his council tax claims
Mr Burnham said he did not profit from the transaction and had only made "allowable claims".Mr Burnham said he did not profit from the transaction and had only made "allowable claims".
"I reject absolutely any suggestion that I have not used public funds properly since I entered Parliament," he said."I reject absolutely any suggestion that I have not used public funds properly since I entered Parliament," he said.
"Indeed, over the last five years, I have under-claimed on my Additional Costs Allowance by around £40,000.""Indeed, over the last five years, I have under-claimed on my Additional Costs Allowance by around £40,000."
Ms Harman told the BBC's Newsnight that the system had changed since many of the claims were made and was still to be overhauled further.Ms Harman told the BBC's Newsnight that the system had changed since many of the claims were made and was still to be overhauled further.
"The claims would only have been paid out if the House of Commons authorities accepted that the claims were made within the rules," she said."The claims would only have been paid out if the House of Commons authorities accepted that the claims were made within the rules," she said.
"I think if people have made claims in good faith under a system that existed at the time then I don't think there's any reason for resignations, but there is reason to tighten up the system.""I think if people have made claims in good faith under a system that existed at the time then I don't think there's any reason for resignations, but there is reason to tighten up the system."
The Telegraph has not revealed how it came by the information, but it is thought to have full details of every claim submitted by every MP from every party dating back to 2004.The Telegraph has not revealed how it came by the information, but it is thought to have full details of every claim submitted by every MP from every party dating back to 2004.
The information was due to be officially published in July under a Freedom of Information request, following a long-running battle over MP's expenses between campaigners and Common authorities.The information was due to be officially published in July under a Freedom of Information request, following a long-running battle over MP's expenses between campaigners and Common authorities.
'Embarrassed''Embarrassed'
The Daily Telegraph's assistant editor Ben Brogan said the disclosures illustrated the "scale of systematic abuse" of parliamentary expenses in recent years.The Daily Telegraph's assistant editor Ben Brogan said the disclosures illustrated the "scale of systematic abuse" of parliamentary expenses in recent years.
He stressed the information was reliable and it was in the public interest that it should be published.He stressed the information was reliable and it was in the public interest that it should be published.
Some ministers would be "embarrassed" by the facts, he said, but it was up to the public to decide whether the practices being highlighted amount to fraud.Some ministers would be "embarrassed" by the facts, he said, but it was up to the public to decide whether the practices being highlighted amount to fraud.
Tax payers will be appalled that the rot in Parliament seems to go right to the Cabinet Matthew Elliott, Taxpayers' AllianceTax payers will be appalled that the rot in Parliament seems to go right to the Cabinet Matthew Elliott, Taxpayers' Alliance
Mr Brogan would not say whether the newspaper paid for the information.Mr Brogan would not say whether the newspaper paid for the information.
But he stressed the material in his possession was not limited to the Cabinet and the newspaper would also be releasing information about the claims of leading opposition politicians in the coming days.But he stressed the material in his possession was not limited to the Cabinet and the newspaper would also be releasing information about the claims of leading opposition politicians in the coming days.
Matthew Elliott, chief executive of the TaxPayers' Alliance, said: "There can be no greater proof of the need for urgent and wholesale reform of MPs' expenses than the fact that so many people at the top of government have been making such dubious claims. Sir Stuart Bell, who sits on the House of Commons Commission which oversees the terms of employment for all political staff, said: "If this was received by unauthorised means, it is disgraceful that a national newspaper should stoop so low as to buy information which will be in the public domain in July.
"Tax payers will be appalled that the rot in Parliament seems to go right to the Cabinet and even Downing Street." "It undermines the very basis of our democracy and is against all the rules of fair play, rewards thieves or leakers of information who may be in breach of contract and does no service to our democracy."
No 10 sources have suggested the information published on Friday is accurate but have insisted the nature and timing of the publication was politically motivated.No 10 sources have suggested the information published on Friday is accurate but have insisted the nature and timing of the publication was politically motivated.
'Dubious claims'
A series of recent scandals over MPs expenses, centred around the so-called second homes allowance, have prompted widespread calls for reform of the allowances system.A series of recent scandals over MPs expenses, centred around the so-called second homes allowance, have prompted widespread calls for reform of the allowances system.
MP voted through a series of reforms - including a requirement for MPs to provide receipts for all spending - earlier this month.MP voted through a series of reforms - including a requirement for MPs to provide receipts for all spending - earlier this month.
The Committee on Standards in Public Life is conducting a review of MP's pay and expenses after MPs expressed concern that public confidence in politicians and Parliament has sunk to an all-time low.The Committee on Standards in Public Life is conducting a review of MP's pay and expenses after MPs expressed concern that public confidence in politicians and Parliament has sunk to an all-time low.
Matthew Elliott, chief executive of the TaxPayers' Alliance, said: "There can be no greater proof of the need for urgent and wholesale reform of MPs' expenses than the fact that so many people at the top of government have been making such dubious claims.
"Tax payers will be appalled that the rot in Parliament seems to go right to the Cabinet and even Downing Street."


Do you think of the rules which have allowed these claims to be made? Do you think MPs should be allowed to claim for things like cleaners, replacement boilers and TVs? What do you think MPs should be allowed to put down as expenses?Do you think of the rules which have allowed these claims to be made? Do you think MPs should be allowed to claim for things like cleaners, replacement boilers and TVs? What do you think MPs should be allowed to put down as expenses?
Please send us your comments using the form below.Please send us your comments using the form below.
A selection of your comments may be published, displaying your name and location unless you state otherwise in the box below.A selection of your comments may be published, displaying your name and location unless you state otherwise in the box below.
The BBC may edit your comments and not all emails will be published. Your comments may be published on any BBC media worldwide. Terms & ConditionsThe BBC may edit your comments and not all emails will be published. Your comments may be published on any BBC media worldwide. Terms & Conditions