This article is from the source 'bbc' and was first published or seen on . It will not be checked again for changes.
You can find the current article at its original source at http://news.bbc.co.uk/go/rss/-/1/hi/uk/8037042.stm
The article has changed 14 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.
| Version 1 | Version 2 |
|---|---|
| Ministers to trim DNA database | Ministers to trim DNA database |
| (40 minutes later) | |
| Ministers are to trim the number of DNA profiles on a national database by up to 85,000 after a court ruled innocent people must be removed. | Ministers are to trim the number of DNA profiles on a national database by up to 85,000 after a court ruled innocent people must be removed. |
| Those arrested, but later released or acquitted, will have their profiles wiped after between six and 12 years. | Those arrested, but later released or acquitted, will have their profiles wiped after between six and 12 years. |
| Officials warned the changes could reduce the number of crimes solved. | Officials warned the changes could reduce the number of crimes solved. |
| But opposition parties accused the government of "giving as little as possible" in response to the European Court of Human Rights judgement. | But opposition parties accused the government of "giving as little as possible" in response to the European Court of Human Rights judgement. |
| Last year the court ruled that the database in England and Wales' was illegal - unlike Scotland's which was deemed "fair and proportionate". | Last year the court ruled that the database in England and Wales' was illegal - unlike Scotland's which was deemed "fair and proportionate". |
| The court said rules allowing police to keep everyone's profile on store were blanket and indiscriminate because they did not differentiate between criminals, the severity of their crimes and innocent people who had never been convicted of an offence. | The court said rules allowing police to keep everyone's profile on store were blanket and indiscriminate because they did not differentiate between criminals, the severity of their crimes and innocent people who had never been convicted of an offence. |
| Current practices in England, Wales and Northern Ireland allow police to retain a numeric genetic profile of everyone arrested for a recordable offence - regardless of whether they are charged or convicted. | Current practices in England, Wales and Northern Ireland allow police to retain a numeric genetic profile of everyone arrested for a recordable offence - regardless of whether they are charged or convicted. |
| The policy has led to protests from individuals, civil liberty groups and opposition parties that the distinction between the guilty and innocent is being "blurred". | The policy has led to protests from individuals, civil liberty groups and opposition parties that the distinction between the guilty and innocent is being "blurred". |
| In contrast, the rules relating to DNA profile retention in Scotland are much narrower. | In contrast, the rules relating to DNA profile retention in Scotland are much narrower. |
| SCOTTISH SITUATION DNA sample on arrestIf cleared, profile deletedIf cleared of serious sexual or violent offence, profile kept for maximum of five yearsSystem praised by European Court on Human Rights | SCOTTISH SITUATION DNA sample on arrestIf cleared, profile deletedIf cleared of serious sexual or violent offence, profile kept for maximum of five yearsSystem praised by European Court on Human Rights |
| The current UK database holds some 4.5m records and has provided 400,000 crime scene matches over a decade. | The current UK database holds some 4.5m records and has provided 400,000 crime scene matches over a decade. |
| Supporters say it has played a key role in some "cold case" crimes where serious offenders have been caught - or innocent people cleared - many years after the original investigation. | Supporters say it has played a key role in some "cold case" crimes where serious offenders have been caught - or innocent people cleared - many years after the original investigation. |
| Launching its consultation on how to comply with the courts judgement, the Home Office said its proposals include: | Launching its consultation on how to comply with the courts judgement, the Home Office said its proposals include: |
| • Destroying all original DNA samples, like mouth swabs, as soon as they are converted into a digital database profile | • Destroying all original DNA samples, like mouth swabs, as soon as they are converted into a digital database profile |
| • Automatically deleting after 12 years the profiles of those arrested but not convicted of a serious violent or sexual crime | • Automatically deleting after 12 years the profiles of those arrested but not convicted of a serious violent or sexual crime |
| • Automatically deleting after six years the profiles of anyone arrested but not convicted of other offences. | • Automatically deleting after six years the profiles of anyone arrested but not convicted of other offences. |
| • Retain indefinitely the DNA profiles and fingerprints of anyone convicted of a recordable offence. | • Retain indefinitely the DNA profiles and fingerprints of anyone convicted of a recordable offence. |
| • Remove the profiles of young people arrested but not convicted, or convicted of less serious offences, when they turn 18 | • Remove the profiles of young people arrested but not convicted, or convicted of less serious offences, when they turn 18 |
| While the DNA profiles of all children under 10-years-old have already been deleted, Home Secretary Jacqui Smith said the database would be expanded to include 30,000 serious offenders convicted before the database was established. | While the DNA profiles of all children under 10-years-old have already been deleted, Home Secretary Jacqui Smith said the database would be expanded to include 30,000 serious offenders convicted before the database was established. |
| Fewer crimes solved | Fewer crimes solved |
| Officials estimate that up to 850,000 of the 4.5m profiles on the database could be affected by the changes and it will take two years to sort through the cases. | Officials estimate that up to 850,000 of the 4.5m profiles on the database could be affected by the changes and it will take two years to sort through the cases. |
| In practice many of these profiles may be retained under the 12 and six year rules. | In practice many of these profiles may be retained under the 12 and six year rules. |
| In its consultation, the Home Office says that removing profiles is "likely to reduce the number of detections that DNA delivers". | In its consultation, the Home Office says that removing profiles is "likely to reduce the number of detections that DNA delivers". |
| One official estimate suggests there will be 4,500 fewer crimes detected a year - rising to 26,000 if the proposals are extended to the policies on retaining fingerprints. | One official estimate suggests there will be 4,500 fewer crimes detected a year - rising to 26,000 if the proposals are extended to the policies on retaining fingerprints. |
| Jacqui Smith said: "It is crucial that we do everything we can to protect the public by preventing crime and bringing offenders to justice. | Jacqui Smith said: "It is crucial that we do everything we can to protect the public by preventing crime and bringing offenders to justice. |
| "These new proposals will ensure that the right people are on it, as well as considering where people should come off. | "These new proposals will ensure that the right people are on it, as well as considering where people should come off. |
| "We will ensure that the most serious offenders are added to the database no matter when or where they were convicted. | "We will ensure that the most serious offenders are added to the database no matter when or where they were convicted. |
| But Shadow home secretary Chris Grayling said: "The Government just doesn't get this. | But Shadow home secretary Chris Grayling said: "The Government just doesn't get this. |
| "People in Britain should be innocent until proven guilty. | "People in Britain should be innocent until proven guilty. |
| "Ministers are just trying to get away with as little as they possibly can instead of taking real action to remove innocent people from the DNA database. It's just not good enough." | "Ministers are just trying to get away with as little as they possibly can instead of taking real action to remove innocent people from the DNA database. It's just not good enough." |
| And Liberal Democrat home affairs spokesman Chris Huhne said: "Once again, the Home Office is fighting an undignified rearguard action designed to give as little as possible in response to the ruling of the European Court of Human Rights. | And Liberal Democrat home affairs spokesman Chris Huhne said: "Once again, the Home Office is fighting an undignified rearguard action designed to give as little as possible in response to the ruling of the European Court of Human Rights. |
| "Today's announcement is nowhere near good enough. Jacqui Smith must not be allowed to get away with anything short of immediately removing all innocent people from the database, except those accused of a violent or sexual offence." | "Today's announcement is nowhere near good enough. Jacqui Smith must not be allowed to get away with anything short of immediately removing all innocent people from the database, except those accused of a violent or sexual offence." |
| Advertisement | |
| Comedian Mark Thomas was angry when he found his DNA samples were on the national database |