This article is from the source 'rtcom' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at https://www.rt.com/usa/531395-ben-shapiro-maher-nance-debate/

The article has changed 3 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 0 Version 1
Who got ‘destroyed by facts & logic’? Internet feuds over outcome of critical race theory duel between Ben Shapiro & MSNBC analyst Who got ‘destroyed by facts & logic’? Internet feuds over outcome of critical race theory duel between Ben Shapiro & MSNBC analyst
(21 days later)
Conservative commentator Ben Shapiro and MSNBC Russia ‘expert’ Malcolm Nance faced off on a range of hot topics during the pair’s appearance on Real Time with Bill Maher, sparking a predictable debate over which pundit triumphed.Conservative commentator Ben Shapiro and MSNBC Russia ‘expert’ Malcolm Nance faced off on a range of hot topics during the pair’s appearance on Real Time with Bill Maher, sparking a predictable debate over which pundit triumphed.
During Friday’s show, HBO’s Bill Maher pressed his guests to explain critical race theory (CRT) – an often-discussed but typically ill-defined cultural phenomenon. During Friday’s show, HBO’s Bill Maher pressed his guests to explain critical race theory (CRT) – an often-discussed but typically ill-defined cultural phenomenon. 
Shapiro took the lead, describing CRT as a worldview that teaches that “all disparity equals discrimination.”Shapiro took the lead, describing CRT as a worldview that teaches that “all disparity equals discrimination.”
When Maher asked Nance to share his thoughts, the former Navy cryptologist and self-declared Russia specialist said he was in full agreement with his ideological nemesis. When Maher asked Nance to share his thoughts, the former Navy cryptologist and self-declared Russia specialist said he was in full agreement with his ideological nemesis. 
“I agree with everything he just said,” Nance proclaimed. Turning to Shapiro, he added: “And I appreciate you being honest in defining what it’s like to be a black American.”“I agree with everything he just said,” Nance proclaimed. Turning to Shapiro, he added: “And I appreciate you being honest in defining what it’s like to be a black American.”
“That’s unfair,” Maher replied. “That’s unfair,” Maher replied. 
“I’m just saying, I agree with all those suppositions because they are grounded in truth,” explained the MSNBC analyst.“I’m just saying, I agree with all those suppositions because they are grounded in truth,” explained the MSNBC analyst.
Shapiro tried to poke holes in Nance’s logic, pointing out that Nance appeared to be a thriving beneficiary of the system which he claimed suffered from systemic injustice.Shapiro tried to poke holes in Nance’s logic, pointing out that Nance appeared to be a thriving beneficiary of the system which he claimed suffered from systemic injustice.
“If you’re going to criticize the meritocracy as an outgrowth of white supremacy then you’re going to have to tear down the system that you’ve succeeded in because you have merit. Or do you not have merit?” the conservative pundit said to Nance. “If you’re going to criticize the meritocracy as an outgrowth of white supremacy then you’re going to have to tear down the system that you’ve succeeded in because you have merit. Or do you not have merit?” the conservative pundit said to Nance. 
Later in the discussion, Nance took his own swipe at Shapiro, insisting that CRT had been “hijacked” by the right as something to be seen as negative, like the “Defund the Police” movement.Later in the discussion, Nance took his own swipe at Shapiro, insisting that CRT had been “hijacked” by the right as something to be seen as negative, like the “Defund the Police” movement.
The pair also locked horns over the January 6 riot at the Capitol. Nance claimed during the discussion that former president Donald Trump had “mobilized 40,000 people” to “lay siege to the Capitol.” The MSNBC analyst then clarified that “over 1,000 or more entered the building.” Shapiro interrupted, describing Nance’s remarks as inaccurate. The pair also locked horns over the January 6 riot at the Capitol. Nance claimed during the discussion that former president Donald Trump had “mobilized 40,000 people” to “lay siege to the Capitol.” The MSNBC analyst then clarified that “over 1,000 or more entered the building.” Shapiro interrupted, describing Nance’s remarks as inaccurate. 
“40,000 people did not assault the Capitol, OK? It’s just factually inaccurate. There were maybe 1,000 people. That is not making light of the evil of those people who all will end up rotting in prison, as they should,” he said. “40,000 people did not assault the Capitol, OK? It’s just factually inaccurate. There were maybe 1,000 people. That is not making light of the evil of those people who all will end up rotting in prison, as they should,” he said. 
Nance didn’t back down, insisting that thousands of people had participated directly or indirectly in the chaos which he blamed on Trump. Shapiro also refused to budge, arguing that his opponent has a “terrible habit” of labeling all Trump voters – 75 million Americans – as violent. Painting with such broad strokes is “ugly,” the conservative said. Nance didn’t back down, insisting that thousands of people had participated directly or indirectly in the chaos which he blamed on Trump. Shapiro also refused to budge, arguing that his opponent has a “terrible habit” of labeling all Trump voters – 75 million Americans – as violent. Painting with such broad strokes is “ugly,” the conservative said. 
The debate appeared to split the internet, with cheerleaders for both talking heads claiming their ‘side’ had emerged victorious. The debate appeared to split the internet, with cheerleaders for both talking heads claiming their ‘side’ had emerged victorious. 
The left-leaning Daily Beast ran a story declaring that Shapiro had “embarrassed himself” during his appearance on Maher’s program, while the right-leaning Daily Wire – which was founded by Shapiro in 2015 – took a not-so-surprising opposite view.The left-leaning Daily Beast ran a story declaring that Shapiro had “embarrassed himself” during his appearance on Maher’s program, while the right-leaning Daily Wire – which was founded by Shapiro in 2015 – took a not-so-surprising opposite view.
Social media was similarly torn. Journalists and pundits couldn’t decide who got “destroyed” during the debate. Social media was similarly torn. Journalists and pundits couldn’t decide who got “destroyed” during the debate. 
Others were furious that Maher had given a platform to Shapiro, lamenting that the conservative could declare victory simply by being invited onto the HBO show. Others were furious that Maher had given a platform to Shapiro, lamenting that the conservative could declare victory simply by being invited onto the HBO show. 
Both pundits are steeped in controversy. Shapiro has been accused by critics of using his media outlet to stir up “outrage politics” and spread misinformation.Both pundits are steeped in controversy. Shapiro has been accused by critics of using his media outlet to stir up “outrage politics” and spread misinformation.
Nance, on the other hand, has taken flak for his often highly provocative televised analysis. In October, the MSNBC personality compared Donald Trump to the leader of Islamic State. His commentary on Russiagate has also raised eyebrows. In 2019 he claimed that former Trump campaign manager Paul Manafort would get “shanked” by Moscow in prison. A year earlier he warned that Russia was firing “cruise missiles of fake news” at the United States.Nance, on the other hand, has taken flak for his often highly provocative televised analysis. In October, the MSNBC personality compared Donald Trump to the leader of Islamic State. His commentary on Russiagate has also raised eyebrows. In 2019 he claimed that former Trump campaign manager Paul Manafort would get “shanked” by Moscow in prison. A year earlier he warned that Russia was firing “cruise missiles of fake news” at the United States.
Like this story? Share it with a friend!Like this story? Share it with a friend!
Dear readers and commenters,
We have implemented a new engine for our comment section. We hope the transition goes smoothly for all of you. Unfortunately, the comments made before the change have been lost due to a technical problem. We are working on restoring them, and hoping to see you fill up the comment section with new ones. You should still be able to log in to comment using your social-media profiles, but if you signed up under an RT profile before, you are invited to create a new profile with the new commenting system.
Sorry for the inconvenience, and looking forward to your future comments,
RT Team.