This article is from the source 'bbc' and was first published or seen on . It will not be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at http://news.bbc.co.uk/go/rss/-/1/hi/england/shropshire/8018471.stm

The article has changed 3 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 0 Version 1
Magistrate resigns in Twitter row Magistrate resigns in Twitter row
(about 7 hours later)
A Shropshire magistrate has resigned from the bench following a complaint about his use of the Twitter network. A magistrate has resigned from the bench following a complaint about his use of the Twitter network.
Steve Molyneux, an IT consultant from Telford, posted messages on the social networking site about sessions at the magistrates' court in the town. IT consultant Steve Molyneux, from Telford, Shropshire, posted messages on the social networking site about cases at the town's magistrates' court
He said everything he reported on Twitter had already been said in open court and he had done nothing illegal.He said everything he reported on Twitter had already been said in open court and he had done nothing illegal.
Mr Molyneux said he had been making use of the latest technology to bring "transparency" to the judicial system.Mr Molyneux said he had been making use of the latest technology to bring "transparency" to the judicial system.
Mr Molyneux, a magistrate for 16 years, said he choose to resign after an individual within the court system lodged a complaint and added that he was not made to leave. The people who read the Twitter read the same thing in the newspaper that evening Steve MolyneuxFormer magistrate
Mr Molyneux, a magistrate for 16 years, said he chose to resign after an individual within the court system lodged a complaint.
"I think things have escalated out of control," he said."I think things have escalated out of control," he said.
"I was using the technology after hearing a remand case just to inform local people and others that follow me in my role of magistrate and didn't think I'd done anything wrong."I was using the technology after hearing a remand case just to inform local people and others that follow me in my role of magistrate and didn't think I'd done anything wrong.
"I didn't prejudice a case, I didn't do anything like that.""I didn't prejudice a case, I didn't do anything like that."
'Seeing justice'
He later told BBC Radio Five Live that he accepted he had to be "careful of the language" he used, but did not accept he should not use the technology.
In fact, he argued, his feed was providing people with a service.
"I use it to communicate with the public. The people who read the Twitter read the same thing in the newspaper that evening.
"The fact [is] I used a piece of technology that allowed others [to know about the case outcome] that may not have read the local newspaper but were just as interested. I saw no harm in it."
He said he believed the judicial system needed to embrace technology to ensure transparency so that the public could see "justice has been done".