This article is from the source 'rtcom' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.
You can find the current article at its original source at https://www.rt.com/usa/528643-tarrio-proud-boys-credit-canceled/
The article has changed 3 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.
| Version 1 | Version 2 |
|---|---|
| Bank CANCELS credit card of Proud Boys leader Enrique Tarrio, citing ‘adverse legal action’ | Bank CANCELS credit card of Proud Boys leader Enrique Tarrio, citing ‘adverse legal action’ |
| (2 months later) | |
| Forget getting canceled on social media platforms, try losing your access to money. That’s what Capital One bank has reportedly done to Enrique Tarrio, leader of the controversial group Proud Boys, by canceling his credit card. | Forget getting canceled on social media platforms, try losing your access to money. That’s what Capital One bank has reportedly done to Enrique Tarrio, leader of the controversial group Proud Boys, by canceling his credit card. |
| Tarrio’s credit card, which he had for almost 12 years, was abruptly canceled at the end of June, he revealed to the conservative news site Gateway Pundit on Wednesday. He showed GP a copy of the letter he was sent, justifying the move by the bank “discovering adverse past or present legal action involving an individual or entity associated with the account.” | Tarrio’s credit card, which he had for almost 12 years, was abruptly canceled at the end of June, he revealed to the conservative news site Gateway Pundit on Wednesday. He showed GP a copy of the letter he was sent, justifying the move by the bank “discovering adverse past or present legal action involving an individual or entity associated with the account.” |
| The only “legal action” currently involving Tarrio is a misdemeanor charge of property destruction and weapons possession, after he allegedly burned a Black Lives Matter banner in Washington, DC last year. He was detained over that incident on the eve of the January 6 riot at the US Capitol and ordered to leave DC. | The only “legal action” currently involving Tarrio is a misdemeanor charge of property destruction and weapons possession, after he allegedly burned a Black Lives Matter banner in Washington, DC last year. He was detained over that incident on the eve of the January 6 riot at the US Capitol and ordered to leave DC. |
| “I don’t know if I’m numb to getting banned off platforms already or this is acceptance to the way of the new ‘West’. I don’t know what it would take to finally get Republicans united in speaking up and legislating against this unconstitutional and inhuman practice of definancing conservatives. Maybe if it would happen to them… because it will… they’ll start doing something about it,” Tarrio told GP. “For now I will do what any entrepreneur would do… and that’s find a temporary solution to this problem until it gets fixed.” | “I don’t know if I’m numb to getting banned off platforms already or this is acceptance to the way of the new ‘West’. I don’t know what it would take to finally get Republicans united in speaking up and legislating against this unconstitutional and inhuman practice of definancing conservatives. Maybe if it would happen to them… because it will… they’ll start doing something about it,” Tarrio told GP. “For now I will do what any entrepreneur would do… and that’s find a temporary solution to this problem until it gets fixed.” |
| Insofar as Tarrio’s “definancing” has been noticed, reactions to it have mainly expressed concern. More than a few online commenters worried about a Chinese-style “social credit” system being de facto applied in the US. Others pointed out that between businesses refusing to accept cash and providers banning people, those with viewpoints deemed “unacceptable” by the corporate world would be prevented from buying anything, “by design.” | Insofar as Tarrio’s “definancing” has been noticed, reactions to it have mainly expressed concern. More than a few online commenters worried about a Chinese-style “social credit” system being de facto applied in the US. Others pointed out that between businesses refusing to accept cash and providers banning people, those with viewpoints deemed “unacceptable” by the corporate world would be prevented from buying anything, “by design.” |
| “Whether you like Tarrio or not, having banks banning people for ideological reasons sets a dangerous precedent,” one commenter wrote, pointing out that the financial industry is heavily regulated and congressional Republicans could and should do something to put an end to these practices. | “Whether you like Tarrio or not, having banks banning people for ideological reasons sets a dangerous precedent,” one commenter wrote, pointing out that the financial industry is heavily regulated and congressional Republicans could and should do something to put an end to these practices. |
| So far, the GOP hasn’t – not even when their own congressional candidates were affected. Last month, Wells Fargo closed the accounts of former House candidate Pete D’Abrosca and former Senate candidate Lauren Witzke. | So far, the GOP hasn’t – not even when their own congressional candidates were affected. Last month, Wells Fargo closed the accounts of former House candidate Pete D’Abrosca and former Senate candidate Lauren Witzke. |
| The bank insisted it “does not consider political views or affiliations in making account decisions,” but declined to specify the reason behind the decision citing “confidential customer information,” saying only that it was “handled appropriately.” | The bank insisted it “does not consider political views or affiliations in making account decisions,” but declined to specify the reason behind the decision citing “confidential customer information,” saying only that it was “handled appropriately.” |
| As major Silicon Valley platforms banned people with heterodox politics, their defenders argued they are immune to the First Amendment as private companies, and those deplatformed should just “build their own.” When conservatives tried just that with Parler, the platform was first kicked off the Google and Apple app stores, then taken offline by Amazon’s cloud services. | As major Silicon Valley platforms banned people with heterodox politics, their defenders argued they are immune to the First Amendment as private companies, and those deplatformed should just “build their own.” When conservatives tried just that with Parler, the platform was first kicked off the Google and Apple app stores, then taken offline by Amazon’s cloud services. |
| Gab, a Twitter competitor set up in 2015 – before the era of political deplatforming – has also run into “definancing” troubles, with CEO Andrew Torba revealing in February that three banks have either dropped them or refused to do business with them, citing negative press attention. Two more banks have done the same since, Torba has said. | Gab, a Twitter competitor set up in 2015 – before the era of political deplatforming – has also run into “definancing” troubles, with CEO Andrew Torba revealing in February that three banks have either dropped them or refused to do business with them, citing negative press attention. Two more banks have done the same since, Torba has said. |
| Think your friends would be interested? Share this story! | Think your friends would be interested? Share this story! |