This article is from the source 'rtcom' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.
You can find the current article at its original source at https://www.rt.com/uk/527394-art-academy-apology-free-speech/
The article has changed 3 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.
| Version 0 | Version 1 |
|---|---|
| UK art academy under fire after apologising for ‘betraying’ free speech of ‘transphobic’ artist Jess de Wahls | UK art academy under fire after apologising for ‘betraying’ free speech of ‘transphobic’ artist Jess de Wahls |
| (2 months later) | |
| After being criticised for removing an artist’s work over her “transphobic” opinions on gender identity ideology, the Royal Academy of Arts has again drawn flak for “intolerance” – after it apologised for “betraying” free speech. | After being criticised for removing an artist’s work over her “transphobic” opinions on gender identity ideology, the Royal Academy of Arts has again drawn flak for “intolerance” – after it apologised for “betraying” free speech. |
| Last week, the academy announced that it had withdrawn textile artist Jess de Wahls’ embroidery from its gift ship over a blog post she wrote in 2019, titled ‘Somewhere over the Rainbow, something went terribly wrong...’, in which she argued for there being just two genders. | Last week, the academy announced that it had withdrawn textile artist Jess de Wahls’ embroidery from its gift ship over a blog post she wrote in 2019, titled ‘Somewhere over the Rainbow, something went terribly wrong...’, in which she argued for there being just two genders. |
| In the post, she noted that the “idea of a gender spectrum and sex as a social construct, rather than a biological reality” had gained a “rather fanatical following and high visibility” in recent years. De Wahls also expressed alarm at how “accusations of bigotry and hatred” were hurled at people who “don’t buy into” the ideology. | In the post, she noted that the “idea of a gender spectrum and sex as a social construct, rather than a biological reality” had gained a “rather fanatical following and high visibility” in recent years. De Wahls also expressed alarm at how “accusations of bigotry and hatred” were hurled at people who “don’t buy into” the ideology. |
| Noting that she had “no animosity” towards anyone who “feels more comfortable expressing themselves as if they are the other sex,” de Wahl said she could not “accept people’s unsubstantiated assertions that they are in fact the opposite sex to when they were born and deserve to be extended the same rights as if they were born as such.” | Noting that she had “no animosity” towards anyone who “feels more comfortable expressing themselves as if they are the other sex,” de Wahl said she could not “accept people’s unsubstantiated assertions that they are in fact the opposite sex to when they were born and deserve to be extended the same rights as if they were born as such.” |
| After the post resurfaced last week, the academy posted an Instagram message thanking those who brought her “transphobic views to our attention.” De Wahls said academy officials had informed her that an official investigation was underway. | After the post resurfaced last week, the academy posted an Instagram message thanking those who brought her “transphobic views to our attention.” De Wahls said academy officials had informed her that an official investigation was underway. |
| On Wednesday, however, “after a great deal of debate,” the institution made an about-turn, issuing a statement that apologised for the way it treated her and pledged to “navigate” such issues better in the future. | On Wednesday, however, “after a great deal of debate,” the institution made an about-turn, issuing a statement that apologised for the way it treated her and pledged to “navigate” such issues better in the future. |
| “We had no right to judge her views on our social media. This betrayed our most important core value – the protection of free speech,” the statement notes, adding that the institution had “thought long and hard” about this episode and the “wider issues it raises.” | “We had no right to judge her views on our social media. This betrayed our most important core value – the protection of free speech,” the statement notes, adding that the institution had “thought long and hard” about this episode and the “wider issues it raises.” |
| Stating that the academy stands for the “plurality of voices, tolerance and free thinking,” the statement added that “freedom of expression can open up debate, create empathy or respect for difference, it can also at times cause hurt and outrage.” | Stating that the academy stands for the “plurality of voices, tolerance and free thinking,” the statement added that “freedom of expression can open up debate, create empathy or respect for difference, it can also at times cause hurt and outrage.” |
| Culture Secretary Oliver Dowden described it as a “welcome apology,” tweeting: “Freedom of expression is central to great art and culture and should always be protected.” | Culture Secretary Oliver Dowden described it as a “welcome apology,” tweeting: “Freedom of expression is central to great art and culture and should always be protected.” |
| Other people chimed in to praise the “fulsome apology,” including Piers Morgan, who tweeted that “the woke worm is turning.” | Other people chimed in to praise the “fulsome apology,” including Piers Morgan, who tweeted that “the woke worm is turning.” |
| However, a number of social media users described the statement as “anodyne” and a “non-apology.” One commenter claimed that the academy’s social media manager, Adam Koszary, had “just admitted they didn’t want to make it,” linking to a since-deleted tweet by Koszary that seemed to imply the whole thing was “performative.” | However, a number of social media users described the statement as “anodyne” and a “non-apology.” One commenter claimed that the academy’s social media manager, Adam Koszary, had “just admitted they didn’t want to make it,” linking to a since-deleted tweet by Koszary that seemed to imply the whole thing was “performative.” |
| In response, de Wahls noted that “ideological capture doesn’t just evaporate over night.” Earlier, the artist had posted a screenshot of an abusive comment purportedly posted on her website that mocked her “win” and warned her not to “mouth off at trans people again.” | In response, de Wahls noted that “ideological capture doesn’t just evaporate over night.” Earlier, the artist had posted a screenshot of an abusive comment purportedly posted on her website that mocked her “win” and warned her not to “mouth off at trans people again.” |
| Meanwhile, the academy found itself on the receiving end of more outrage after tendering its apology, with several people criticising it for its “lack of principles” and demanding that it change its pride-themed rainbow profile picture and “actually stand in solidarity with LGBTQ people.” | Meanwhile, the academy found itself on the receiving end of more outrage after tendering its apology, with several people criticising it for its “lack of principles” and demanding that it change its pride-themed rainbow profile picture and “actually stand in solidarity with LGBTQ people.” |
| Arguing that “supporting free speech shouldn’t include hate speech,” actor David Paisley called on the institution to release an “equivalent statement about your support for diversity, inclusivity and the safety of minority communities... specifically the LGBT+ community.” | Arguing that “supporting free speech shouldn’t include hate speech,” actor David Paisley called on the institution to release an “equivalent statement about your support for diversity, inclusivity and the safety of minority communities... specifically the LGBT+ community.” |
| Think your friends would be interested? Share this story! | Think your friends would be interested? Share this story! |
| Dear readers and commenters, | |
| We have implemented a new engine for our comment section. We hope the transition goes smoothly for all of you. Unfortunately, the comments made before the change have been lost due to a technical problem. We are working on restoring them, and hoping to see you fill up the comment section with new ones. You should still be able to log in to comment using your social-media profiles, but if you signed up under an RT profile before, you are invited to create a new profile with the new commenting system. | |
| Sorry for the inconvenience, and looking forward to your future comments, | |
| RT Team. |