This article is from the source 'bbc' and was first published or seen on . It will not be checked again for changes.
You can find the current article at its original source at http://news.bbc.co.uk/go/rss/-/1/hi/northern_ireland/8009572.stm
The article has changed 2 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.
Previous version
1
Next version
Version 0 | Version 1 |
---|---|
Bid to outlaw smacking abandoned | Bid to outlaw smacking abandoned |
(about 3 hours later) | |
The NI children's commissioner has abandoned attempts to ban smacking because of "financial constraints". | |
In February, the Court of Appeal dismissed Patricia Lewsley's latest attempt to outlaw smacking. | In February, the Court of Appeal dismissed Patricia Lewsley's latest attempt to outlaw smacking. |
Her office incurred costs of £81,329, even before having to foot the bill of taking the case to the Court of Appeal. | Her office incurred costs of £81,329, even before having to foot the bill of taking the case to the Court of Appeal. |
PUP leader Dawn Purvis said the lack of funds was concerning, adding: "If the children's commissioner cannot act on behalf of all children - who can?" | |
Ms Purvis added: "This has been a contentious issue, however the children's commissioner has been put in place to look after the interests of all children. | |
"This is an issue that she has found to be a priority and yet she does not feel she has the funds to address it." | |
Ms Lewsley said she was disappointed that she could not continue her legal efforts to end the "unequal treatment of children who suffer an assault". | |
"However, I will continue my efforts to make sure that children have equal treatment and protection in law," she said. | |
Defence | Defence |
Ms Lewsley had been criticised by the DUP who accused her of mounting an "ideologically-driven campaign which attempts to criminalise parents", but she insisted her court action had been taken to protect children. | Ms Lewsley had been criticised by the DUP who accused her of mounting an "ideologically-driven campaign which attempts to criminalise parents", but she insisted her court action had been taken to protect children. |
"The law as it stands makes it illegal to hit a child, but a defence is available to parents to a charge of common assault of a child," she said. | "The law as it stands makes it illegal to hit a child, but a defence is available to parents to a charge of common assault of a child," she said. |
"I believe that is unclear, confusing for parents, and needs to be reformed. It should be clear that there is to be no more hitting of children in Northern Ireland." | "I believe that is unclear, confusing for parents, and needs to be reformed. It should be clear that there is to be no more hitting of children in Northern Ireland." |
She added: "In the same way as hitting adult partners was made illegal and without any defence, I am confident that one day there will be no defence for hitting a child." | She added: "In the same way as hitting adult partners was made illegal and without any defence, I am confident that one day there will be no defence for hitting a child." |
The cost of the Court of Appeal action is not yet known. | The cost of the Court of Appeal action is not yet known. |
Previous version
1
Next version