This article is from the source 'bbc' and was first published or seen on . It will not be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at http://news.bbc.co.uk/go/rss/-/1/hi/england/hampshire/8002641.stm

The article has changed 7 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 4 Version 5
Drugs led to deaths of patients Drugs led to deaths of patients
(about 1 hour later)
Five patients who died at a hospital in Hampshire in the late 1990s were prescribed too much medication, an inquest jury has ruled. Three patients who died at a hospital in Hampshire in the late 1990s were given inappropriate medication, an inquest jury has ruled.
Three of those patients were given inappropriate medication, the inquest at Portsmouth Coroner's Court found. The inquest panel looked at the deaths of 10 patients at Gosport War Memorial Hospital between 1996 and 1999.
The inquest panel of five women and three men looked at the deaths of 10 patients at the Gosport War Memorial Hospital between 1996 and 1999. The panel of five women and three men also found that two patients were given the correct medication but in doses which contributed to their deaths.
The patients' families are now calling for a criminal investigation.The patients' families are now calling for a criminal investigation.
Some of the relatives had long believed morphine was being over-prescribed.Some of the relatives had long believed morphine was being over-prescribed.
Three investigations
Police carried out investigations into 92 patients' treatment at the hospital, but no prosecutions were brought.Police carried out investigations into 92 patients' treatment at the hospital, but no prosecutions were brought.
The jury decided that in the cases of Robert Wilson, 74, Geoffrey Packman, 66, and Elsie Devine, 88, the use of painkillers was inappropriate for their condition. Three investigations
We did not expect this inquest to be transparent, honest or fair and our expectations have been met in full Statement by families The jury at Portsmouth Coroner's Court decided that in the cases of Robert Wilson, 74, Geoffrey Packman, 66, and Elsie Devine, 88, the use of painkillers was inappropriate for their condition.
Arthur Cunningham, 79, and Elsie Lavender, 83, were prescribed medication appropriate for their condition but in doses which contributed to their deaths, jurors found.Arthur Cunningham, 79, and Elsie Lavender, 83, were prescribed medication appropriate for their condition but in doses which contributed to their deaths, jurors found.
In the cases of Leslie Pittock, Helena Service, Ruby Lake, Enid Spurgin and Sheila Gregory, the jury decided that the prescription of painkillers had not contributed to their deaths.In the cases of Leslie Pittock, Helena Service, Ruby Lake, Enid Spurgin and Sheila Gregory, the jury decided that the prescription of painkillers had not contributed to their deaths.
We did not expect this inquest to be transparent, honest or fair and our expectations have been met in full Statement by families
The inquest recorded a narrative verdict.The inquest recorded a narrative verdict.
The jury heard evidence from members of the patients' families, medical experts and staff at the hospital, including Dr Jane Barton.The jury heard evidence from members of the patients' families, medical experts and staff at the hospital, including Dr Jane Barton.
She was investigated by police in connection with deaths at the hospital but she was not charged with any offence.She was investigated by police in connection with deaths at the hospital but she was not charged with any offence.
'Therapeutic purposes'
She said in a statement: "I can say that I have always acted with care, concern and compassion towards my patients.She said in a statement: "I can say that I have always acted with care, concern and compassion towards my patients.
"I am pleased the jury recognised that in all of these cases, drugs were only given for therapeutic purposes.""I am pleased the jury recognised that in all of these cases, drugs were only given for therapeutic purposes."
Relatives of some of the patients who died react to the inquest verdict
In a statement after the verdicts, the families said: "This has been a 10-year emotional journey for the families, not just those families directly involved in the inquest but also the relatives of the 92 victims investigated by the police who are also still waiting for answers.In a statement after the verdicts, the families said: "This has been a 10-year emotional journey for the families, not just those families directly involved in the inquest but also the relatives of the 92 victims investigated by the police who are also still waiting for answers.
"We did not expect this inquest to be transparent, honest or fair and our expectations have been met in full.""We did not expect this inquest to be transparent, honest or fair and our expectations have been met in full."
Relatives of some of the patients who died react to the inquest verdict
"Extreme drug overdoses were given without justification or logic that rendered our families comatose in a matter of hours and dead soon after, giving relatives no warning or opportunity to speak with them."Extreme drug overdoses were given without justification or logic that rendered our families comatose in a matter of hours and dead soon after, giving relatives no warning or opportunity to speak with them.
"The families' journeys are not over. Once we have all the evidence as denied by this coroner, we will reflect on the last few weeks and decide our next steps.""The families' journeys are not over. Once we have all the evidence as denied by this coroner, we will reflect on the last few weeks and decide our next steps."
The families also said that a fresh criminal investigation by Hampshire police was needed, although the force has said it will not reinvestigate any of the deaths. Inquiry call
"Hampshire Constabulary has conducted three separate investigations during which the Crown Prosecution Service has been fully consulted. The families also said that a fresh criminal investigation by Hampshire police was needed.
But in response to their call the force has said it will not reinvestigate any of the deaths.
Meanwhile, the patient safety charity Action against Medical Accidents (AvMA) called for a public inquiry.
AvMA chief executive Peter Walsh said: "It is now quite clear the refusal to hold a public inquiry was wrong.
"There were other deaths at Gosport which should have been looked into as well as the role played by various agencies, which may have prevented the poor practice at Gosport or it being investigated promptly and appropriately."
In response, the force said: "Hampshire Constabulary has conducted three separate investigations during which the Crown Prosecution Service has been fully consulted.
"The evidence gathered during these investigations was shared with the coroner and heard by the jury during the course of the inquests."The evidence gathered during these investigations was shared with the coroner and heard by the jury during the course of the inquests.
"It is our genuine hope that the extensive nature of the investigations conducted, the findings of the Crown Prosecution Service and now that of HM Coroner, provide those involved with some resolution, if not comfort, for the loss of loved ones.""It is our genuine hope that the extensive nature of the investigations conducted, the findings of the Crown Prosecution Service and now that of HM Coroner, provide those involved with some resolution, if not comfort, for the loss of loved ones."