This article is from the source 'bbc' and was first published or seen on . It will not be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at http://news.bbc.co.uk/go/rss/-/1/hi/northern_ireland/8001864.stm

The article has changed 3 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 1 Version 2
'Victimised' vet's £50,000 payout 'Victimised' vet's £50,000 payout
(1 day later)
A Zimbabwean-born vet has been paid £50,000 by a government department in settlement of race relations cases.A Zimbabwean-born vet has been paid £50,000 by a government department in settlement of race relations cases.
Dr Crispin Madavo claimed internal disciplinary proceedings against him were acts of victimisation prompted by earlier cases he had brought.Dr Crispin Madavo claimed internal disciplinary proceedings against him were acts of victimisation prompted by earlier cases he had brought.
The Department of Agriculture agreed to the settlement, without admission of liability, and apologised to Dr Madavo.The Department of Agriculture agreed to the settlement, without admission of liability, and apologised to Dr Madavo.
He was employed by the department as an official veterinary surgeon and based at an abattoir in Coleraine.He was employed by the department as an official veterinary surgeon and based at an abattoir in Coleraine.
In 1999, Dr Madavo brought proceedings alleging racial discrimination against the department and these were settled in 2003.In 1999, Dr Madavo brought proceedings alleging racial discrimination against the department and these were settled in 2003.
He subsequently brought a case against the department in 2006 alleging that he had been victimised because of those earlier proceedings.He subsequently brought a case against the department in 2006 alleging that he had been victimised because of those earlier proceedings.
An industrial tribunal, in a decision in June 2008, stated: "We found that Dr Madavo was singled out and victimised by reason of his bringing earlier race discrimination proceedings."An industrial tribunal, in a decision in June 2008, stated: "We found that Dr Madavo was singled out and victimised by reason of his bringing earlier race discrimination proceedings."
I believe I was punished simply for refusing to accept treatment which I think amounted to unlawful discrimination Dr Crispin MadavoI believe I was punished simply for refusing to accept treatment which I think amounted to unlawful discrimination Dr Crispin Madavo
The tribunal awarded him £8,136 in compensation.The tribunal awarded him £8,136 in compensation.
Prior to the hearing of that case, the department had instituted internal disciplinary proceedings against Dr Madavo in September 2006, following an allegation of harassment made by a person named in the vet's complaints.Prior to the hearing of that case, the department had instituted internal disciplinary proceedings against Dr Madavo in September 2006, following an allegation of harassment made by a person named in the vet's complaints.
After a disciplinary hearing in June 2007, the department imposed on Dr Madavo a disciplinary transfer and a disciplinary warning of two years duration.After a disciplinary hearing in June 2007, the department imposed on Dr Madavo a disciplinary transfer and a disciplinary warning of two years duration.
The vet claimed he had been victimised for complaining about racial discrimination.The vet claimed he had been victimised for complaining about racial discrimination.
"I believe I was punished simply for refusing to accept treatment which I think amounted to unlawful discrimination," Dr Madavo said."I believe I was punished simply for refusing to accept treatment which I think amounted to unlawful discrimination," Dr Madavo said.
"I am happy to see the matter finally resolved with the acceptance by the department that I had acted reasonably in pursuing my concerns, and in the rescinding of the disciplinary action incorrectly taken against me.""I am happy to see the matter finally resolved with the acceptance by the department that I had acted reasonably in pursuing my concerns, and in the rescinding of the disciplinary action incorrectly taken against me."
The department has also agreed to meet with the Equality Commission, who supported the case.The department has also agreed to meet with the Equality Commission, who supported the case.