This article is from the source 'rtcom' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at https://www.rt.com/usa/522971-cornell-racist-rock-climbing-course/

The article has changed 3 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 0 Version 1
Ivy League uni Cornell opens minorities-only rock-climbing course to all students, after months of furore over ‘segregation’ Ivy League uni Cornell opens minorities-only rock-climbing course to all students, after months of furore over ‘segregation’
(4 months later)
After prompting fierce backlash and accusations of promoting “racial segregation,” a rock-climbing course geared exclusively towards ethnic minorities at Cornell University in New York has now opened enrolment to all students.After prompting fierce backlash and accusations of promoting “racial segregation,” a rock-climbing course geared exclusively towards ethnic minorities at Cornell University in New York has now opened enrolment to all students.
While the course, titled PE 1641: BIPOC Rock Climbing, retains a “special focus” on enabling black, indigenous, Latin, Asian, or other people of color (BIPOC) to learn the sport, white students are no longer barred from enrolling in the $315 physical education class.While the course, titled PE 1641: BIPOC Rock Climbing, retains a “special focus” on enabling black, indigenous, Latin, Asian, or other people of color (BIPOC) to learn the sport, white students are no longer barred from enrolling in the $315 physical education class.
Previously, the course was only open to students identifying as BIPOC.Previously, the course was only open to students identifying as BIPOC.
For months, it sparked heated online debate. On Reddit, a topic titled “End Racially Segregated PE Classes at Cornell” saw a number of concerns and criticisms raised that related to the “deliberate exclusion of students on the basis of their race.”For months, it sparked heated online debate. On Reddit, a topic titled “End Racially Segregated PE Classes at Cornell” saw a number of concerns and criticisms raised that related to the “deliberate exclusion of students on the basis of their race.”
As the story gained traction in national media, the university initially pushed back against the furore.As the story gained traction in national media, the university initially pushed back against the furore.
“While some [activities] may include a focus on students with specific identities, they are not restricted to only those students. Cornell offers many programs that support interests and perspectives of different parts of our community,” university spokesperson John Carberry told the Cornell Daily Sun student-run newspaper in an article published on Tuesday.“While some [activities] may include a focus on students with specific identities, they are not restricted to only those students. Cornell offers many programs that support interests and perspectives of different parts of our community,” university spokesperson John Carberry told the Cornell Daily Sun student-run newspaper in an article published on Tuesday.
However, the course instructors told the publication it was “highly unlikely” that students who do “not consider themselves BIPOC” would enroll. They pointed to issues of “inaccessibility for minorities in this white-centric sport” that is “affected by racism, sexism and sizeism.”However, the course instructors told the publication it was “highly unlikely” that students who do “not consider themselves BIPOC” would enroll. They pointed to issues of “inaccessibility for minorities in this white-centric sport” that is “affected by racism, sexism and sizeism.”
The article also quoted a number of students explaining that the course’s BIPOC aspect made it a “safe space” where participation was “more comfortable, accessible and encouraging in an unfamiliar environment.”The article also quoted a number of students explaining that the course’s BIPOC aspect made it a “safe space” where participation was “more comfortable, accessible and encouraging in an unfamiliar environment.”
One student said that the focus ought to be “less on why segregation exists and more on why there’s a need to segregate.”One student said that the focus ought to be “less on why segregation exists and more on why there’s a need to segregate.”
Claiming that being a minority at a “predominantly white institution” created a feeling of isolation, another student said, “Hearing people complain about this class, saying it’s taking away from our white peers is laughable and frustrating.”Claiming that being a minority at a “predominantly white institution” created a feeling of isolation, another student said, “Hearing people complain about this class, saying it’s taking away from our white peers is laughable and frustrating.”
However, according to the most recent data available from the National Center for Education Statistics, white students accounted for just 36% of the university’s over 15,000-strong undergraduate cohort in the fall of 2019.However, according to the most recent data available from the National Center for Education Statistics, white students accounted for just 36% of the university’s over 15,000-strong undergraduate cohort in the fall of 2019.
Despite the open enrolment policy, a number of users on social media claimed the course “is still racist.” Others wondered how it could be in compliance with Title VI of the Civil Rights Act (1964) – which protects against exclusion and discrimination based on race, color or national origin in activities that receive Federal financial assistance.Despite the open enrolment policy, a number of users on social media claimed the course “is still racist.” Others wondered how it could be in compliance with Title VI of the Civil Rights Act (1964) – which protects against exclusion and discrimination based on race, color or national origin in activities that receive Federal financial assistance.
For one person, the episode showed the “lunacy of the ‘under represented’ argument.”For one person, the episode showed the “lunacy of the ‘under represented’ argument.”
“Did it ever occur to Cornell that students signed up for rock climbing based on interest, not the color of their skin? The only factor that would make minorities under rep is if you chose not to enroll them,” tweeted Kevin Harley, who describes himself as a filmmaker.“Did it ever occur to Cornell that students signed up for rock climbing based on interest, not the color of their skin? The only factor that would make minorities under rep is if you chose not to enroll them,” tweeted Kevin Harley, who describes himself as a filmmaker.
Some supportive users pointed out that the course was a “remedial class” borne out of “necessity” but others countered that the takeaway from it were the “virtues of race essentialism and segregation.”Some supportive users pointed out that the course was a “remedial class” borne out of “necessity” but others countered that the takeaway from it were the “virtues of race essentialism and segregation.”
“If this sounds racist to you, what do you think about women-only and men-only classes? They exist, and most people are ok with it,” one person asked.“If this sounds racist to you, what do you think about women-only and men-only classes? They exist, and most people are ok with it,” one person asked.
If you like this story, share it with a friend!If you like this story, share it with a friend!
Dear readers and commenters,
We have implemented a new engine for our comment section. We hope the transition goes smoothly for all of you. Unfortunately, the comments made before the change have been lost due to a technical problem. We are working on restoring them, and hoping to see you fill up the comment section with new ones. You should still be able to log in to comment using your social-media profiles, but if you signed up under an RT profile before, you are invited to create a new profile with the new commenting system.
Sorry for the inconvenience, and looking forward to your future comments,
RT Team.