This article is from the source 'rtcom' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.
You can find the current article at its original source at https://www.rt.com/russia/522224-brazil-rejects-sputnik-uncertain-data/
The article has changed 3 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.
| Version 0 | Version 1 |
|---|---|
| Brazil rejects Russia’s Sputnik V Covid-19 vaccine, citing ‘uncertain’ data – creator says decision is political & driven by US | Brazil rejects Russia’s Sputnik V Covid-19 vaccine, citing ‘uncertain’ data – creator says decision is political & driven by US |
| (4 months later) | |
| The maker of Russia’s Sputnik V Covid-19 vaccine believes the US has pressured Brazil into refusing approval of its formula for political reasons. Brazil’s health regulator says there are “inherent risks” and defects with the jab. | The maker of Russia’s Sputnik V Covid-19 vaccine believes the US has pressured Brazil into refusing approval of its formula for political reasons. Brazil’s health regulator says there are “inherent risks” and defects with the jab. |
| The South American country is in desperate need of Covid-19 vaccine doses, and has been one of the hardest-hit nations throughout the pandemic. However, despite requests from Brazilian politicians, regulator Anvisa believes there is a lack of documentation to guarantee its safety, and data about its efficacy is “uncertain.” | The South American country is in desperate need of Covid-19 vaccine doses, and has been one of the hardest-hit nations throughout the pandemic. However, despite requests from Brazilian politicians, regulator Anvisa believes there is a lack of documentation to guarantee its safety, and data about its efficacy is “uncertain.” |
| After the news broke late on Monday that Brazil would not import Sputnik V, the vaccine maker’s official Twitter account fired back in Portuguese, claiming the delay in approving was “of a political nature” and “nothing to do with access to information or science.” It also cited the 2020 United States Department of Health and Human Services annual report, which stated that Washington sought to prevent Brazil from allowing the Russian vaccine. | After the news broke late on Monday that Brazil would not import Sputnik V, the vaccine maker’s official Twitter account fired back in Portuguese, claiming the delay in approving was “of a political nature” and “nothing to do with access to information or science.” It also cited the 2020 United States Department of Health and Human Services annual report, which stated that Washington sought to prevent Brazil from allowing the Russian vaccine. |
| The latest decision is not the first time that Anvisa has refused to register Sputnik V, also rejecting an application to approve it for emergency use in January. Despite this, in March, the country’s Ministry of Health signed a contract with the Russian Direct Investment Fund (RDIF) for the supply of 10 million doses. | The latest decision is not the first time that Anvisa has refused to register Sputnik V, also rejecting an application to approve it for emergency use in January. Despite this, in March, the country’s Ministry of Health signed a contract with the Russian Direct Investment Fund (RDIF) for the supply of 10 million doses. |
| On Monday, the same day as the most recent Anvisa rejection, Brazil’s Ministry of Science, Technology, Innovation, and Communications approved the Russian vaccine for commercial use. | On Monday, the same day as the most recent Anvisa rejection, Brazil’s Ministry of Science, Technology, Innovation, and Communications approved the Russian vaccine for commercial use. |
| Thus far, Sputnik has been authorized in 61 countries, and published results have shown that it is both effective and safe. Earlier this month, a real-world study based on data from 3.8 million inoculated people showed an efficacy of 97.6%, demonstrating that it has “one of the best protection rates against coronavirus among all vaccines,” according to RDIF head Kirill Dmitriev. | Thus far, Sputnik has been authorized in 61 countries, and published results have shown that it is both effective and safe. Earlier this month, a real-world study based on data from 3.8 million inoculated people showed an efficacy of 97.6%, demonstrating that it has “one of the best protection rates against coronavirus among all vaccines,” according to RDIF head Kirill Dmitriev. |
| The latest news may be worrying for the RDIF, and could lead to fears that other nations will follow in Brazil’s footsteps. In particular, there has been a long wait to approve Sputnik V by the European Union. The EU’s drug regulator, the European Medicines Agency (EMA), has signed off on Western-made jabs from BioNTech/Pfizer, Moderna, AstraZeneca, and Johnson & Johnson, but is yet to certify Sputnik. Despite it not being registered by the bloc, two EU countries, Hungary and Slovakia, have already unilaterally imported and started using the vaccine. Other nations, such as Germany and Austria, have signaled they will purchase doses upon approval. | The latest news may be worrying for the RDIF, and could lead to fears that other nations will follow in Brazil’s footsteps. In particular, there has been a long wait to approve Sputnik V by the European Union. The EU’s drug regulator, the European Medicines Agency (EMA), has signed off on Western-made jabs from BioNTech/Pfizer, Moderna, AstraZeneca, and Johnson & Johnson, but is yet to certify Sputnik. Despite it not being registered by the bloc, two EU countries, Hungary and Slovakia, have already unilaterally imported and started using the vaccine. Other nations, such as Germany and Austria, have signaled they will purchase doses upon approval. |
| Last Thursday, the World Health Organization revealed it would begin the new round of reviewing the Russian vaccine on May 10, along with the EMA. | Last Thursday, the World Health Organization revealed it would begin the new round of reviewing the Russian vaccine on May 10, along with the EMA. |
| Like this story? Share it with a friend! | Like this story? Share it with a friend! |
| Dear readers and commenters, | |
| We have implemented a new engine for our comment section. We hope the transition goes smoothly for all of you. Unfortunately, the comments made before the change have been lost due to a technical problem. We are working on restoring them, and hoping to see you fill up the comment section with new ones. You should still be able to log in to comment using your social-media profiles, but if you signed up under an RT profile before, you are invited to create a new profile with the new commenting system. | |
| Sorry for the inconvenience, and looking forward to your future comments, | |
| RT Team. |