This article is from the source 'rtcom' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.
You can find the current article at its original source at https://www.rt.com/usa/521916-montana-religion-law/
The article has changed 3 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.
| Version 0 | Version 1 |
|---|---|
| American theocracy? Montana adopts law that allows people to challenge regulations that interfere with their religious beliefs | American theocracy? Montana adopts law that allows people to challenge regulations that interfere with their religious beliefs |
| (4 months later) | |
| Montana has been accused of undermining America’s secular values after the state passed a bill that will allow people to object to government regulations on religious grounds. | Montana has been accused of undermining America’s secular values after the state passed a bill that will allow people to object to government regulations on religious grounds. |
| Signed into law by Republican Governor Greg Gianforte on Thursday, the Montana Religious Freedom Restoration Act requires the state government to have a compelling reason to override a person’s constitutional right to freedom of religion, and mandates that any perceived violation of that right be done in the least restrictive way possible. Similar legislation has been adopted by 21 other states. | Signed into law by Republican Governor Greg Gianforte on Thursday, the Montana Religious Freedom Restoration Act requires the state government to have a compelling reason to override a person’s constitutional right to freedom of religion, and mandates that any perceived violation of that right be done in the least restrictive way possible. Similar legislation has been adopted by 21 other states. |
| A spokesperson for Gianforte’s office said in a statement that in the past, such laws have been used to “allow Native American children to wear braids in school, Sikhs to wear turbans in the military, and Christian employers to refuse to cover abortions under their health insurance policies.” | A spokesperson for Gianforte’s office said in a statement that in the past, such laws have been used to “allow Native American children to wear braids in school, Sikhs to wear turbans in the military, and Christian employers to refuse to cover abortions under their health insurance policies.” |
| But critics said the bill would open the door to discriminatory practices in areas such as housing and employment. | But critics said the bill would open the door to discriminatory practices in areas such as housing and employment. |
| The law will allow individuals to “turn the shield of religious freedom” into “a weapon” to attack the LGBTQ and indigenous communities in Montana, Shawn Reagor, director of Equality and Economic Justice with the Montana Human Rights Network, told the Associated Press, adding that the provision goes against the spirit of the state’s “live-and-let-live” values. He said that the provision violated recent court rulings, as well as ordinances of five Montana cities and counties. | The law will allow individuals to “turn the shield of religious freedom” into “a weapon” to attack the LGBTQ and indigenous communities in Montana, Shawn Reagor, director of Equality and Economic Justice with the Montana Human Rights Network, told the Associated Press, adding that the provision goes against the spirit of the state’s “live-and-let-live” values. He said that the provision violated recent court rulings, as well as ordinances of five Montana cities and counties. |
| Lt. Gov. Kristen Juras reassured the public last month that the bill was not a “license to discriminate” against the LGBTQ community, but judging by responses on Twitter, many seemed to still take issue with it. | Lt. Gov. Kristen Juras reassured the public last month that the bill was not a “license to discriminate” against the LGBTQ community, but judging by responses on Twitter, many seemed to still take issue with it. |
| “I’m seriously at the point of just discriminating against religion,” read one comment. “We are NOT a theocracy, and fed the hell up with people hiding behind the facade of religion to then use it as a weapon.” | “I’m seriously at the point of just discriminating against religion,” read one comment. “We are NOT a theocracy, and fed the hell up with people hiding behind the facade of religion to then use it as a weapon.” |
| Another comment accused Republicans of wanting to “mandate” religion. | Another comment accused Republicans of wanting to “mandate” religion. |
| “Only a matter of time before the bishop becomes head of state?” one sarcastic reply read. | “Only a matter of time before the bishop becomes head of state?” one sarcastic reply read. |
| Still, it’s unclear how the law will actually be used in practice. One local journalist noted that Montana has a Declaration of Rights that protects from discrimination, and that some legal experts believe nothing will fundamentally change. | Still, it’s unclear how the law will actually be used in practice. One local journalist noted that Montana has a Declaration of Rights that protects from discrimination, and that some legal experts believe nothing will fundamentally change. |
| History also suggests that the legislation is not exclusive to Republican governments. In 1993, former President Clinton signed a similar bill into law, which allows individuals to challenge federal regulations that interfere with religious beliefs. | History also suggests that the legislation is not exclusive to Republican governments. In 1993, former President Clinton signed a similar bill into law, which allows individuals to challenge federal regulations that interfere with religious beliefs. |
| The issue of how religious convictions intersect with anti-discrimination laws has become the subject of ongoing debate, following the case of a Colorado baker who refused to bake a cake for a same-sex couple getting married, citing his Christian beliefs. The case went all the way to the US Supreme Court, which handed the baker a partial victory after ruling that the Colorado Civil Rights Commission was guilty of anti-religious bias when it sanctioned him for refusing to make the cake. | The issue of how religious convictions intersect with anti-discrimination laws has become the subject of ongoing debate, following the case of a Colorado baker who refused to bake a cake for a same-sex couple getting married, citing his Christian beliefs. The case went all the way to the US Supreme Court, which handed the baker a partial victory after ruling that the Colorado Civil Rights Commission was guilty of anti-religious bias when it sanctioned him for refusing to make the cake. |
| Like this story? Share it with a friend! | Like this story? Share it with a friend! |
| Dear readers and commenters, | |
| We have implemented a new engine for our comment section. We hope the transition goes smoothly for all of you. Unfortunately, the comments made before the change have been lost due to a technical problem. We are working on restoring them, and hoping to see you fill up the comment section with new ones. You should still be able to log in to comment using your social-media profiles, but if you signed up under an RT profile before, you are invited to create a new profile with the new commenting system. | |
| Sorry for the inconvenience, and looking forward to your future comments, | |
| RT Team. |