This article is from the source 'rtcom' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at https://www.rt.com/usa/513599-impeachment-democratic-senator-preside/

The article has changed 4 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 1 Version 2
Partisan Dem Senator Leahy to be Trump's judge AND a juror as SCOTUS chief balks at presiding over impeachment trial Partisan Dem Senator Leahy to be Trump's judge AND a juror as SCOTUS chief balks at presiding over impeachment trial
(7 months later)
Democrats have chosen Patrick Leahy, known as one of the most partisan members of the Senate, to preside over Donald Trump's impeachment trial after Chief Justice John Roberts declined a role not called for in the Constitution.Democrats have chosen Patrick Leahy, known as one of the most partisan members of the Senate, to preside over Donald Trump's impeachment trial after Chief Justice John Roberts declined a role not called for in the Constitution.
The job fell to Leahy (D-Vermont), president pro tempore of the Senate, on Monday because the US Constitution provides for the chief justice to serve as judge only when a sitting president or vice president is impeached. In fact, the Constitution doesn't specifically make provision for a former president at all – an omission that critics such as former representative Bob Barr (R-Georgia) have argued means the Senate has no standing to convict Trump.The job fell to Leahy (D-Vermont), president pro tempore of the Senate, on Monday because the US Constitution provides for the chief justice to serve as judge only when a sitting president or vice president is impeached. In fact, the Constitution doesn't specifically make provision for a former president at all – an omission that critics such as former representative Bob Barr (R-Georgia) have argued means the Senate has no standing to convict Trump.
Democrats, nevertheless, plan to move forward with the Senate trial, starting in the second week of February. Unlike Chief Justice Roberts, who presided over Trump's first impeachment trial a year ago, Leahy will also get to vote on whether to convict Trump.Democrats, nevertheless, plan to move forward with the Senate trial, starting in the second week of February. Unlike Chief Justice Roberts, who presided over Trump's first impeachment trial a year ago, Leahy will also get to vote on whether to convict Trump.
Conservatives have already cried foul, arguing that Leahy is not fit for the role due his apparent anti-Trump bias. Former Trump adviser Boris Epshteyn referred to the Democratic lawmaker as “a stone-cold partisan,” arguing that “any semblance of fairness or due process” at the impending trial is bound to go “out of the window” if Leahy is in charge.Conservatives have already cried foul, arguing that Leahy is not fit for the role due his apparent anti-Trump bias. Former Trump adviser Boris Epshteyn referred to the Democratic lawmaker as “a stone-cold partisan,” arguing that “any semblance of fairness or due process” at the impending trial is bound to go “out of the window” if Leahy is in charge.
Leahy has courted criticism from the anti-Trump crowd as well. "This will be a nightmare for this nation when the Republicans take issue, and they will," a self-described “Trumpism” opponent said."This is about us, not you."Leahy has courted criticism from the anti-Trump crowd as well. "This will be a nightmare for this nation when the Republicans take issue, and they will," a self-described “Trumpism” opponent said."This is about us, not you."
"I think you're great and I get the logic here but the GOP is looking for any way out of the trial. Let the Chief Justice preside," another said."I think you're great and I get the logic here but the GOP is looking for any way out of the trial. Let the Chief Justice preside," another said.
Leahy has bashed Trump on a wide range of issues over the past four years, from banning travelers from seven predominantly Muslim countries, to the size of Trump's inauguration crowd, and cutting funding to the World Health Organization. Even after the Mueller probe failed to find evidence that the Trump campaign colluded with Russia to win the 2016 election, Leahy continued to allege nefarious ties between the president and the Kremlin. He called Trump's acquittal in last year's Senate impeachment trial "beyond outrageous."Leahy has bashed Trump on a wide range of issues over the past four years, from banning travelers from seven predominantly Muslim countries, to the size of Trump's inauguration crowd, and cutting funding to the World Health Organization. Even after the Mueller probe failed to find evidence that the Trump campaign colluded with Russia to win the 2016 election, Leahy continued to allege nefarious ties between the president and the Kremlin. He called Trump's acquittal in last year's Senate impeachment trial "beyond outrageous."
The senator has also been outspoken on the allegations behind the latest impeachment – that Trump incited an "insurrection" at the US Capitol on January 6. Leahy said earlier this month that Trump is "the greatest threat to the Constitution and to American democracy in a generation." He added that healing the nation would first require Trump to be held accountable for fueling and exploiting a "dark undercurrent of insurrection."The senator has also been outspoken on the allegations behind the latest impeachment – that Trump incited an "insurrection" at the US Capitol on January 6. Leahy said earlier this month that Trump is "the greatest threat to the Constitution and to American democracy in a generation." He added that healing the nation would first require Trump to be held accountable for fueling and exploiting a "dark undercurrent of insurrection."
A judge who had publicly expressed such strong opinions about a defendant might normally be asked to recuse himself from the case in the US court system. Leahy himself blasted Supreme Court Justice Amy Coney Barrett in November for refusing to recuse herself from a case concerning Obamacare because she had criticized the law. And Leahy, who called the Supreme Court hyper-partisan after Barrett's confirmation, was judged by his colleagues in a 2009 vote to be the most partisan Democrat in the Senate, ranking ahead of even the likes of Chuck Schumer (D-New York) and Dick Durbin (D-Illinois).A judge who had publicly expressed such strong opinions about a defendant might normally be asked to recuse himself from the case in the US court system. Leahy himself blasted Supreme Court Justice Amy Coney Barrett in November for refusing to recuse herself from a case concerning Obamacare because she had criticized the law. And Leahy, who called the Supreme Court hyper-partisan after Barrett's confirmation, was judged by his colleagues in a 2009 vote to be the most partisan Democrat in the Senate, ranking ahead of even the likes of Chuck Schumer (D-New York) and Dick Durbin (D-Illinois).
In a statement on Monday, Leahy vowed to administer Trump's trial "with fairness, in accordance with the Constitution and the laws." In a statement on Monday, Leahy vowed to administer Trump's trial "with fairness, in accordance with the Constitution and the laws." 
Like this story? Share it with a friend!Like this story? Share it with a friend!
Dear readers and commenters,
We have implemented a new engine for our comment section. We hope the transition goes smoothly for all of you. Unfortunately, the comments made before the change have been lost due to a technical problem. We are working on restoring them, and hoping to see you fill up the comment section with new ones. You should still be able to log in to comment using your social-media profiles, but if you signed up under an RT profile before, you are invited to create a new profile with the new commenting system.
Sorry for the inconvenience, and looking forward to your future comments,
RT Team.