This article is from the source 'bbc' and was first published or seen on . It will not be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at http://news.bbc.co.uk/go/rss/-/1/hi/business/7946124.stm

The article has changed 8 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 1 Version 2
Council pension funds suing RBS Council pension funds suing RBS
(about 1 hour later)
Two local authority pension funds have told the BBC they are suing Royal Bank of Scotland (RBS) for compensation.Two local authority pension funds have told the BBC they are suing Royal Bank of Scotland (RBS) for compensation.
The Merseyside and North Yorkshire funds accuse RBS of withholding the extent of the bank's problems before its government rescue last year.The Merseyside and North Yorkshire funds accuse RBS of withholding the extent of the bank's problems before its government rescue last year.
The legal action against RBS, which has declined to comment, has been launched in the US. Other UK pension funds are said to be considering joining them.The legal action against RBS, which has declined to comment, has been launched in the US. Other UK pension funds are said to be considering joining them.
They will be represented by Cherie Blair QC, wife of Tony Blair. They will be represented by Cherie Booth QC, wife of Tony Blair.
Share collapseShare collapse
RBS gained an extra £12bn from shareholders following the conclusion of a successful share issue in June of last year.RBS gained an extra £12bn from shareholders following the conclusion of a successful share issue in June of last year.
The purpose of the litigation from the side of Merseyside Pension Fund is to hold management to account Peter Wallach, head of the Merseyside Pension FundThe purpose of the litigation from the side of Merseyside Pension Fund is to hold management to account Peter Wallach, head of the Merseyside Pension Fund
Yet just five months later in November, the bank needed to accept a £20bn rescue package from the government in exchange for a 58% stake in the bank, which was subsequently increased to 68%.Yet just five months later in November, the bank needed to accept a £20bn rescue package from the government in exchange for a 58% stake in the bank, which was subsequently increased to 68%.
The then RBS bosses, led by Sir Fred Goodwin, have subsequently stood down from the bank.The then RBS bosses, led by Sir Fred Goodwin, have subsequently stood down from the bank.
At the same time, the firm's share price has collapsed, down from 243 pence immediately after the June share issue to the current 22.5p.At the same time, the firm's share price has collapsed, down from 243 pence immediately after the June share issue to the current 22.5p.
Public interest
Peter Murphy, a partner at Sackers, a specialist pension law firm, said that the US legal system was better suited to this type of claim.
"US lawyers act on a 'no win, no fee' basis and plaintiffs do not have to pay for the other side's legal costs even if they lose," he said.
However, he expressed surprise that Ms Booth, who was involved in the case.
"Her profile is mainly in UK and European human rights law, not US securities litigation. But that is not to say she doesn't have relevant expertise," he said.
"Her involvement in the case will certainly add greater public interest to an already high-profile media event."
'Inaccurate''Inaccurate'
Peter Wallach, the head of the Merseyside Pension Fund, said he wished to ascertain whether statements made by the former RBS bosses before the share issue and subsequent government rescue "were in any way inaccurate or misleading to shareholders".Peter Wallach, the head of the Merseyside Pension Fund, said he wished to ascertain whether statements made by the former RBS bosses before the share issue and subsequent government rescue "were in any way inaccurate or misleading to shareholders".
"The purpose of the litigation from the side of Merseyside Pension Fund is to hold management to account," he said."The purpose of the litigation from the side of Merseyside Pension Fund is to hold management to account," he said.
"Our concern is that perhaps management didn't indicate to shareholders the full extent of the deterioration in the bank's finances when it first came to shareholders for additional capital.""Our concern is that perhaps management didn't indicate to shareholders the full extent of the deterioration in the bank's finances when it first came to shareholders for additional capital."
The legal action has come in the shape of a US class action civil lawsuit, which enables a number of complainants to join together and make one, collective claim.The legal action has come in the shape of a US class action civil lawsuit, which enables a number of complainants to join together and make one, collective claim.
The UK solicitors representing Merseyside Pension Fund - Bates, Wells & Braithwaite have so far been unavailable for comment. As has Mrs Blair's Matrix Chambers office.
Mr Wallach added that the case was being take on a no-win, no-fee basis, so there was no risk to its pension holders.Mr Wallach added that the case was being take on a no-win, no-fee basis, so there was no risk to its pension holders.