This article is from the source 'bbc' and was first published or seen on . It will not be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at http://news.bbc.co.uk/go/rss/-/1/hi/uk_politics/6239939.stm

The article has changed 7 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 5 Version 6
Lords consider mental health laws Lords consider mental health laws
(about 3 hours later)
The House of Lords has begun a detailed consideration of proposals to introduce new mental health laws. The House of Lords is carrying out a detailed consideration of proposals to introduce new mental health laws.
The new government bill would allow the enforced detention of people who are mentally ill, even if they have not committed any crime.The new government bill would allow the enforced detention of people who are mentally ill, even if they have not committed any crime.
It also suggests strengthening powers established in 1983 to ensure patients have therapy once they are released back into the community.It also suggests strengthening powers established in 1983 to ensure patients have therapy once they are released back into the community.
Critics of the bill say it would fail to safeguard the rights of patients.Critics of the bill say it would fail to safeguard the rights of patients.
Health Minister Rosie Winterton said the bill would reflect changes to mental health services in recent years.Health Minister Rosie Winterton said the bill would reflect changes to mental health services in recent years.
"We have made it very clear in the bill that appropriate treatment has to be available for detention to take place," she said."We have made it very clear in the bill that appropriate treatment has to be available for detention to take place," she said.
Ensure medicationEnsure medication
Current laws do not allow people with severe personality disorders who have committed no offence to be detained.Current laws do not allow people with severe personality disorders who have committed no offence to be detained.
The government wants to give the right to force patients who have been released into the community to take their medication, even if they do not want to.The government wants to give the right to force patients who have been released into the community to take their medication, even if they do not want to.
It also wants to allow the detention of people with personality orders who are described as untreatable, even if they have not committed a crime.It also wants to allow the detention of people with personality orders who are described as untreatable, even if they have not committed a crime.
I think the idea that somehow this bill is going to prevent homicides and violent assaults is a mistake. Professor Sheila HollinsRoyal College of PsychiatristsI think the idea that somehow this bill is going to prevent homicides and violent assaults is a mistake. Professor Sheila HollinsRoyal College of Psychiatrists
Doctors and campaigners argue the bill erodes the rights of patients without making the public any safer.Doctors and campaigners argue the bill erodes the rights of patients without making the public any safer.
About 50 Labour MPs have already signalled their intention to oppose the bill, which would apply to England and Wales. An amendment to ensure a set of guiding principles protecting patients' rights was debated.
The changes would affect about 14,000 of the 600,000 people who use mental health services each year. Broadcaster and writer Lord Bragg, who takes the Labour whip, said this was of "crucial importance."
Professor Sheila Hollins, president of the Royal College of Psychiatrists, said the bill would not help all people with mental health problems. Treatments
"I think the idea that somehow this bill is going to prevent homicides and violent assaults is a mistake. He said: "People should retain as much autonomy as possible. People may have decision-making ability over many of the areas where decisions need to be made.
"In some ways there is a possibility that by increasing stigma associated with mental illness we will actually deter people from coming forward." "It may be necessary for someone to receive treatment under compulsory powers, but they may have views and knowledge about which treatments have previously helped or harmed them."
Added power He added: "People should be supported to make their own decisions where possible and given the same choices as people with physical health conditions."
Wendy Robinson, whose daughter was killed by a man with schizophrenia, said more needed to be done to identify potentially dangerous people before they caused harm.
"A lot of people are not picked up, they are not taken in and treated before something goes wrong.
"I do think there needs to be an added part of the law where they can actually take somebody in, section them and look after them."
The bill was promised in the Queen's Speech and comes after previous attempts to change the act were thwarted by opposition from campaigners and doctors.The bill was promised in the Queen's Speech and comes after previous attempts to change the act were thwarted by opposition from campaigners and doctors.
The government published a draft Mental Health Bill in 2002, but dropped it last March.The government published a draft Mental Health Bill in 2002, but dropped it last March.
Instead of replacing the old laws, the latest bill proposes amending the existing act from 1983. Instead of replacing the old laws, the latest bill proposes amending the existing Mental Health Act from 1983.
Health Minister Lord Hunt said the proposed amendment was not appropriate in a bill that sought not to re-write the law completely but merely to amend the old act.
Conservative Lord Howe, who did not put his amendment to a vote, said: "I urge the government to be bold, to use this opportunity to put the legislation into a context of values and, in so doing, to make a real difference to mental health patients."
About 50 Labour MPs have already signalled their intention to oppose the bill, which would apply to England and Wales.
The changes would affect about 14,000 of the 600,000 people who use mental health services each year.
The desire to change the law was largely driven by Michael Stone's 1998 conviction for the murders of Lin and Megan Russell.The desire to change the law was largely driven by Michael Stone's 1998 conviction for the murders of Lin and Megan Russell.