This article is from the source 'bbc' and was first published or seen on . It will not be checked again for changes.
You can find the current article at its original source at http://news.bbc.co.uk/go/rss/-/1/hi/business/7906820.stm
The article has changed 15 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.
| Version 10 | Version 11 |
|---|---|
| Mail pensions 'facing collapse' | Mail pensions 'facing collapse' |
| (about 1 hour later) | |
| Royal Mail and its pension fund are in danger of collapse if ministers do not press ahead with part-privatisation, the pension scheme trustees say. | Royal Mail and its pension fund are in danger of collapse if ministers do not press ahead with part-privatisation, the pension scheme trustees say. |
| The trustees' chairman, Jane Newell, says the fund's deficit may be "significantly larger" than the £5.9bn estimated last year. | The trustees' chairman, Jane Newell, says the fund's deficit may be "significantly larger" than the £5.9bn estimated last year. |
| The deficit was identified last year in a review of Royal Mail as the main problem hindering the business. | The deficit was identified last year in a review of Royal Mail as the main problem hindering the business. |
| Plans for the postal service will be introduced in parliament on Thursday. | Plans for the postal service will be introduced in parliament on Thursday. |
| Ministers want to sell a stake of about 30% to the private sector to help pay for the modernisation of the service. | Ministers want to sell a stake of about 30% to the private sector to help pay for the modernisation of the service. |
| The deficit... is highly unlikely to be affordable by Royal Mail, with potentially devastating consequences Jane Newell Read the trustees' letter in fullThe Hooper Review explained | |
| Billy Hayes, general secretary of the Communication Workers Union (CWU), said that the trustees' letter was "a distraction designed to scare MPs". | Billy Hayes, general secretary of the Communication Workers Union (CWU), said that the trustees' letter was "a distraction designed to scare MPs". |
| "Privatisation is not linked in any way to sorting out the pension fund. It's not even about protecting pension benefits, it's about making the company viable for take-over," he added. | "Privatisation is not linked in any way to sorting out the pension fund. It's not even about protecting pension benefits, it's about making the company viable for take-over," he added. |
| Tim Brown, chief executive of the postal regulator Postcomm, told MPs that removing the pension burden from the Royal Mail would not solve all its financial problems. | |
| It would help in the short and medium term, but "that doesn't secure them for the longer term" he told MPs on the select committee for the business, enterprise and regulatory reform. | |
| About 140 Labour MPs have signed a motion opposing the part-privatisation. | About 140 Labour MPs have signed a motion opposing the part-privatisation. |
| 'Devastating consequences' | 'Devastating consequences' |
| The Hooper review, published in December, recommended that the government take over the Royal Mail pension scheme, to remove the burden of the deficit from the business, as part of a partial privatisation process. | The Hooper review, published in December, recommended that the government take over the Royal Mail pension scheme, to remove the burden of the deficit from the business, as part of a partial privatisation process. |
| Business Secretary Lord Mandelson speaking in January this year | Business Secretary Lord Mandelson speaking in January this year |
| Ms Newell's letter echoes this, and warns that in its present state the company is financially very weak, and is technically insolvent with its debts outweighing its assets. | Ms Newell's letter echoes this, and warns that in its present state the company is financially very weak, and is technically insolvent with its debts outweighing its assets. |
| If the recommendations of the Hooper review are not pushed through, she argues, then the trustees would be forced to change the way they value the scheme. | If the recommendations of the Hooper review are not pushed through, she argues, then the trustees would be forced to change the way they value the scheme. |
| That would increase even further the cost of paying pensions in the future for the scheme's 450,000 members, with the knock-on effect of making the deficit even larger. | That would increase even further the cost of paying pensions in the future for the scheme's 450,000 members, with the knock-on effect of making the deficit even larger. |
| As the Royal Mail could not afford to pay higher contributions, then this might trigger the collapse of the company and the closure of the scheme. | As the Royal Mail could not afford to pay higher contributions, then this might trigger the collapse of the company and the closure of the scheme. |
| A larger deficit is "highly unlikely to be affordable by Royal Mail, with potentially devastating consequences", Ms Newell says. | A larger deficit is "highly unlikely to be affordable by Royal Mail, with potentially devastating consequences", Ms Newell says. |
| "At present, in a winding-up the plan would not even be able to provide as much as 50% of members' benefits," she adds. | "At present, in a winding-up the plan would not even be able to provide as much as 50% of members' benefits," she adds. |
| The company is already committed to paying an extra £284m a year, for the next 15 years, to pay off a £3.4bn deficit that was calculated in 2006. | The company is already committed to paying an extra £284m a year, for the next 15 years, to pay off a £3.4bn deficit that was calculated in 2006. |
| Another valuation of the scheme has to be agreed by 30 June next year. | Another valuation of the scheme has to be agreed by 30 June next year. |
| Protest | |
| In December, Business Secretary Lord Mandelson, to whom Ms Newell's letter is addressed, endorsed the recommendations of the Hooper review that called for a minority stake in the business to be sold off. | In December, Business Secretary Lord Mandelson, to whom Ms Newell's letter is addressed, endorsed the recommendations of the Hooper review that called for a minority stake in the business to be sold off. |
| HAVE YOUR SAY It is wrong to privatise Royal Mail. Part-privatisation will be the thin end of the wedge David King, Herefordshire Send us your comments | HAVE YOUR SAY It is wrong to privatise Royal Mail. Part-privatisation will be the thin end of the wedge David King, Herefordshire Send us your comments |
| He said Royal Mail could not survive in its current form, because of severe financial constraints and falling demand for sending letters, and needed fresh investment in technology to prosper. | |
| Lord Mandelson denies the plan amounts to a sell-off of the business, saying it will be a "partnership" that maintains Labour's commitment at the last election to keep Royal Mail in public ownership. | Lord Mandelson denies the plan amounts to a sell-off of the business, saying it will be a "partnership" that maintains Labour's commitment at the last election to keep Royal Mail in public ownership. |
| But unions will stage a mass protest on Tuesday against the plans, which they say are "deeply unpopular". | But unions will stage a mass protest on Tuesday against the plans, which they say are "deeply unpopular". |