This article is from the source 'rtcom' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at https://www.rt.com/russia/500991-russia-demands-washington-explain-whether/

The article has changed 2 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 0 Version 1
Russia demands Washington explain whether US facilitates terrorist attacks against Crimeans after NBC report Russia demands answers from Washington on whether the US is facilitating terrorist attacks in Crimea, after NBC report
(about 1 hour later)
Russia’s embassy in the US has demanded clarification after an unnamed American official was cited in a report stating that US forces are providing weapons to militant units in Crimea as they launch attacks on Russian troops.Russia’s embassy in the US has demanded clarification after an unnamed American official was cited in a report stating that US forces are providing weapons to militant units in Crimea as they launch attacks on Russian troops.
The embassy said it treated the report with “grave concern” in a social media post on Thursday, asking Washington to provide further details as to whether American weapons were being passed to Ukrainian fighters carrying out clandestine operations in Crimea. The embassy said it treated the statement with “grave concern” in a social media post on Thursday, asking Washington to provide further details as to whether American weapons were being passed to Ukrainian fighters carrying out clandestine operations in Crimea.
“Unnamed US officials speak about their country’s support of terrorist activities in third countries. In this case, they talk specifically about Russia,” the embassy said on Facebook.“Unnamed US officials speak about their country’s support of terrorist activities in third countries. In this case, they talk specifically about Russia,” the embassy said on Facebook.
Published at NBC News on Monday, the report in question centered on allegations that Moscow had paid “bounties” to Taliban fighters who killed American troops in Afghanistan, a claim that first surfaced in a June New York Times story. However, buried in the article’s 12th paragraph, an anonymous official is cited as saying that US intelligence had assumed a “bounty program” existed, as it believed it was “a proportional response to the US arming of Ukrainian units fighting Russian forces in Crimea.” Published by NBC News on Monday, the report in question centered on allegations that Moscow had paid “bounties” to Taliban fighters who killed American troops in Afghanistan, a claim that first surfaced in a June New York Times story. However, buried in the article’s 12th paragraph, an anonymous official, as is customary in US media, is cited as saying that US intelligence had assumed a “bounty program” existed, as it believed it was “a proportional response to the US arming of Ukrainian units fighting Russian forces in Crimea.”
Though Washington has openly provided tens of millions of dollars in weapons and other military gear to Kiev in 2020 alone, the Donald Trump administration has never discussed support for military operations against Russian forces in Crimea.Though Washington has openly provided tens of millions of dollars in weapons and other military gear to Kiev in 2020 alone, the Donald Trump administration has never discussed support for military operations against Russian forces in Crimea.
The peninsula became part of Russia in 2014 following a referendum in which 95 percent of Crimean voters supported reunification, with turnout surpassing 80 percent. It was prompted by the ouster of Ukrainian President Viktor Yanukovich by opposition forces supported by Washington – some, such as the Azov Battalion, affiliated with hardline far-right extremists.  The peninsula returned to Russia in 2014 following a referendum in which 95 percent of Crimean voters supported reunification, with turnout surpassing 80 percent. It was prompted by the ouster of Ukrainian President Viktor Yanukovich by opposition forces supported by Washington – some, such as the Azov Battalion, affiliated with hardline far-right extremists. 
Known as the ‘Euromaidan’, the pro-EU protests in Kiev sparked unrest in Ukraine’s Russian-speaking enclaves, namely the eastern Donbass region and the Crimean Peninsula to the south, seeing heated protests against the newly installed government. Crimeans ultimately voted to reunite with Russia in a status referendum in March 2014, and while the result of the vote has been strongly contested by Washington and its European allies, Western polling agencies Pew and Gallup have since confirmed that a sizable majority of residents favored reunification and believe the referendum was “free and fair.” Known as the ‘Euromaidan’, the pro-Western protests in Kiev sparked unrest in Ukraine’s ethnic-Russian enclaves, namely the eastern Donbass region and the Crimean Peninsula to the south, seeing heated protests against the newly installed government. The result of the March 2014 referendum was strongly contested by Washington and its European allies, but Western polling agencies Pew and Gallup have since confirmed that a sizable majority of residents favored reunification and believe the referendum was “free and fair.”
Think your friends would be interested? Share this story!Think your friends would be interested? Share this story!